Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Canada Moving Backwards on Illegal Drugs

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internationally, illegal drug use remains a major public health problem. In response, many countries have begun to shift their illegal drug policies away from enforcement and towards public health objectives. Recently, both the Global Commission on Drug Policy and the Supreme Court of Canada have endorsed this change in direction, supporting empirically sound illegal drug policies that reduce criminalization and stigmatization of drug users and bolster treatment and harm reduction efforts. Until recently, Canada was a participant in this growing movement towards rational drug policy. Unfortunately, in recent years, policy changes have made Canada one of the few remaining advocates of a “war-on-drugs” approach. Indeed, the current government has implemented a number of new illegal drug policies that contradict well-established scientific evidence from public health, criminology and other fields. As such, their approach is expected to do little to reduce the harms associated with substance use in Canada. The authors call on the current government to heed the recommendations of the Global Commission’s report and learn from the many countries that are innovating in illegal drug policy by prioritizing evidence, human rights and public health.

Résumé

La consommation de drogue continue à poser un grave problème de santé publique à l’échelle mondiale. En réaction, de nombreux pays commencent à réorienter leurs politiques de lutte contre les drogues illicites, passant d’une optique d’application de la loi à une optique axée sur des objectifs de santé publique. Dernièrement, la Global Commission on Drug Policy et la Cour suprême du Canada ont avalisé ce changement d’orientation en appuyant des politiques antidrogue empiriquement fiables qui réduisent la criminalisation et la stigmatisation des utilisateurs de drogue et renforcent les mesures de traitement et de réduction des méfaits. Jusqu’à récemment, le Canada faisait partie de ce mouvement croissant pour une politique antidrogue rationnelle. Malheureusement, ces dernières années, des changements d’orientation ont fait du Canada l’un des rares derniers porte-parole de l’approche de la «guerre contre la drogue». En fait, le gouvernement actuel met en œuvre un certain nombre de nouvelles politiques antidrogue qui sont en contradiction avec des preuves scientifiques bien établies dans les domaines de la santé publique, de la criminologie et autres. Il est peu probable qu’une telle approche réduise les préjudices associés à la consommation de substances au Canada. Les auteurs invitent le gouvernement actuel à prendre au sérieux les recommandations du rapport de la Global Commission et à tirer des leçons de l’expérience des nombreux pays qui innovent en matière de politique antidrogue en accordant la priorité aux données probantes, aux droits humains et à la santé publique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Department of Justice: National Drug Intelligence Centre. The economic impact of illicit drug use on American society. April 2011. Available at: http://www.justice.gov/ndic/pubs44/44731/44731p.pdf (Accessed June 2, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wood E, Tyndall MW, Spittal PM, Li K, Anis AH, Hogg RS, Montaner JSG, O’Shaughnessy MVO, Schechter MT. Impact of supply-side policies for control of illicit drugs in the face of the AIDS and overdose epidemics: Investigation of a massive heroin seizure. CMAJ 2003;168(2):165–69.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Open Society Foundation. At What Cost: HIV and Human Rights Consequences of the War on Drugs. Open Society Foundations, March 2009. Available at: http://www.soros.org/initiatives/health/focus/ihrd/article_publications/publications/atwhatcost_20090302 (Accessed July 4, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Global Commission on Drug Policy. Report of the Global Commission on Drug Policy. Available at: http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/Report (Accessed June 2, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Makin K, Dhillon S, Peritz I. Supreme Court ruling opens doors to drug injection clinics across Canada. The Globe and Mail 2011 Sept 30. Available at: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/bc-drug-injection-clinic-can-stay-open-supreme-court-rules/article2186191/ (Accessed October 11, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marshall B, Milloy M-J, Wood E, Montaner JSG, Kerr T. Reduction in overdose mortality after the opening of North America’s first medically supervised safer injecting facility: A retrospective population-based study. Lancet 2011;377(9775):1429–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nature. Science in retreat [Editorial]. Nature 2008;451(7181):866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood E, Kerr T, Tyndall M, Montaner JS. The Canadian government’s treatment of scientific process and evidence: Inside the evaluation of North America’s first supervised injecting facility. IJDP 2008;19(3):220–25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeBeck K, Wood E, Kerr T, Montaner JS. Canada’s new federal “National AntiDrug Strategy”: An informal audit of reported funding allocation. IJDP 2009;20(2):188–91.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giesbrecht N, Haydon E. Community-based interventions and alcohol, tobacco and other drugs: Foci, outcomes and implications. Drug Alcohol Rev 2006;25(6):633–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barnett L, Dupuis T, Kirkby C, MacKay R, Nicol J, Bechard J. Legislative Summary of Bill C-10: An Act to enact the Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act and to amend the State Immunity Act, the Criminal Code, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, the Youth Criminal Justice Act, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and other Acts. October 5, 2011. Library of Parliament. Available at: http://www.parl.gc.ca/About/Parliament/LegislativeSummaries/bills_ls.asp?Language=E&ls=c10&Parl=41&Ses=1&source=library_prb (Accessed December 8, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gabor T, Crutcher N. Mandatory minimum penalties: Their effects on crime, sentencing disparities, and justice system expenditures. Ottawa, ON: Justice Canada, Research and Statistics Division, January 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shore R. Doctors, scientists want proposed federal drug law scrapped. Vancouver Sun. February 7, 2011. Available at: http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Doctors+scientists+want+proposed+federal+drug+scrapped/4238150/story.html (Accessed May 25. 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. McGregor, J. Senate in no rush to pass omnibus crime bill. CBC News. December 7, 2011. Available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2011/12/07/pol-crime-senate.html (Accessed December 8, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clark C. Canada pledges $5-million to fight drug crime in the Americas. The Globe and Mail. 2011 7 June. Available at: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canada-pledges-5-million-to-fight-drug-crime-in-the-americas/article2051094/ (Accessed June 9, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Health Canada. Canadian Drug and Alcohol Use Monitoring Survey: Summary of Results for 2009. Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/drugs-drogues/stat/_2009/summary-sommaire-eng.php (Accessed May 25, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Statistics Canada. Police-reported crime statistics in Canada, 2009. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2010002/article/11292-eng.htm (Accessed May 25, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Kerr PhD.

Additional information

Conflict of Interest: None to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hyshka, E., Butler-McPhee, J., Elliott, R. et al. Canada Moving Backwards on Illegal Drugs. Can J Public Health 103, 125–127 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404216

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404216

Keywords

Mots clés

Navigation