Skip to main content
Log in

Lower Risk Cannabis Use Guidelines: For Whom?

  • Invited Editorial
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Erickson P. A public health approach to demand reduction. J Drug Issues 1990;20:563–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hathaway AD. Cannabis effects and dependency concerns in long-term frequent users: A missing piece of the public health puzzle. Addict Res Theory 2003;11:441–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas G, Flight J, Richard K, Racine S. Toward a policy-relevant typology of cannabis use in Canada: Analysis drawn from the Canadian Addiction Survey. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thake J, Davis CG. Assessing problematic cannabis use. Addict Res Theory 2011;19: early online, posted January 12, 2011.

  5. Le Dain Commission. Final Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs. Ottawa, ON: Information Canada, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Temple EC, Brown RF, Hine DW. The ‘grass ceiling’: Limitations in the literature hinder our understanding of cannabis use and its consequences. Addiction 2010;106:238–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hathaway AD, Rossiter K. Medical marijuana, community building and Canada’s compassionate societies. Contemporary Justice Rev 2007;10:283–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Erickson PG, Ottaway CA. Original Review: Policy - Alcohol and Other Drugs. In: Langenbucher JW, McCrady BS, Frankenstein W, Nathan PE (Eds.), Annual Review of Addictions Research and Treatment. Tarrytown, NY: Pergamon, Elsevier Science, 1994; 331–41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brochu S, Duff C, Asbridge M, Erickson PG. ‘There’s what happens on paper and then there’s what happens, out on the sidewalk’: Cannabis users’ knowledge and opinions of Canadian drug laws. J Drug Issues 2011;41:95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Poulin C, Nicholson J. Should harm minimization as an approach to adolescent substance use be embraced by junior and senior high schools? Int J Drug Policy 2005;16:403–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyshka E, Erickson PG, Hathaway AD. The time for marijuana decriminal-ization has come again… and again. Criminal Law Bull 2011;47:258–75.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erickson PG, Hathaway AD. Normalization and harm reduction: Research avenues and policy agendas. Int J Drug Policy 2010;21:137–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aldridge J, Measham F, Williams L. Illegal Leisure Revisited: Changing Patterns of Alcohol and Drug Use in Adolescents and Young Adults. New York, NY: Routledge, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parker H. Normalization as a barometer: Recreational drug use and the consumption of leisure by younger Britons. Addict Res Theory 2005;13:205–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia G. Erickson PhD.

Additional information

Acknowledgements: Infrastructure support for scientists at CAMH is provided by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario. The views expressed in this editorial are solely those of the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erickson, P.G. Lower Risk Cannabis Use Guidelines: For Whom?. Can J Public Health 102, 328–329 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404170

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404170

Navigation