Skip to main content
Log in

Learning Needs as Perceived by Women Less Than or Equal to 16 Weeks Pregnant

  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In April 1997, 120 women ≤16 weeks gestation responded to a survey conducted by the Middlesex-London Health Unit, which identified learning needs of women in their first trimester of pregnancy. This survey was part of a larger community initiative to plan, develop and implement first trimester “Prenatal Health Fairs” in London, Ontario.

A listing of topics identified by women as most salient to their learning needs is included. There was a strong emergence of the need to include environmental health issues in the first trimester curriculum. The ranking of topics was unrelated to age, education and employment status with the exception that employed women were more likely to rank coping with discomforts of pregnancy, reasons for regular prenatal care and physical changes of pregnancy as important. Specific information related to reasons for attending a health fair, best times, locations and methods of advertising is addressed.

Résumé

En avril 1997, 120 femmes enceintes de moins de 16 semaines ont répondu à un sondage du bureau de santé de London et Middlesex, sondage visant à identifier les besoins d’apprentissage des femmes au cours du premier trimestre de grossesse. Ce sondage se situe dans le cadre d’une initiative collective plus large visant à planifier, développer et mettre en oeuvre les „ Foires santé prénatales ” du premier trimestre, à London, en Ontario.

Une liste des sujets identifiés par les femmes comme étant les points les plus saillants de leurs besoins d’apprentissage, est jointe. La question des problèmes de santé environnementale se situait en tête de liste. Le classement des sujets n’était pas lié à la question de l’âge, du niveau d’éducation ou de l’emploi, sauf que les femmes qui occupaient un emploi avaient de plus grandes chances d’accorder plus d’importance aux questions d’inconfort pendant la grossesse, aux raisons pour des soins prénatals et aux changements physiques en cours de grossesse. Des renseignements plus précis dont les raisons de participer à une foire santé, les meilleures dates, les lieux et les modes de publicité sont des sujets abordés.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ontario Ministry of Health, Public Health Branch. Mandatory Health Programs and Services. Reproductive Health: Guide for Early Pregnancy Education Initiatives. Toronto: 1996; 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ontario Ministry of Health, Public Health Branch. Mandatory Guidelines for Public Health Programs. Toronto: 1989; 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chollet D, Newman J, Sumner A. The cost of poor birth outcomes in employer-sponsored health plans. Medical Care 1996;34(12):1219–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haas J, McCormick M. Hospital use and health status of women during the 5 years following the birth of a premature low-birthweight infant. Am J Public Health 1997;87(7):1151–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. The Canadian Institute of Child Health. Best Start: Community Action for Healthy Babies. Prevention of Low Birthweight in Canada: Literature Review and Strategies. Prepared for the Health Promotion Branch, Ontario Ministry of Health. Toronto: 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Middlesex-London Health Unit. Prenatal Health Fairs-Board Report. London, Ontario: Report No. 061-97.

  7. Sable M, Herman A. The relationship between prenatal health behaviour advice and low birth weight. Public Health Rep 1997;112 (July/August):332–39.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Karim R. Birth defects in Southwestern Ontario. In: Alder R, Vingilis E, Mai V (Eds.), Community Health and Well-being in Southwestern Ontario. A Resource for Planning. London, Ontario: Middlesex-London Health Unit and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Helton M. Prenatal Care. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice 1997;24(1):135–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sullivan P. Felt learning needs of pregnant women. The Canadian Nurse 1993; 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart P, Ramsingh R, Potter J, Nadon C. Promoting first trimester prenatal classes: A survey. Can J Public Health 1993;84(5):331–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Middlesex-London Health Unit. Prenatal Health Fair Fact Sheet. London, Ontario, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Middlesex-London Health Unit. Education Program for Expectant Families: Statistic Review Committee Final Report. London, Ontario, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Statistics Canada, 1996 Census.

  15. Ontario Ministry of Health, Ontario Livebirth Database; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richards D. Perinatal education to improve birth outcomes. Home Healthcare Nurse 1991;9(5):35–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yolanda A. Camiletti RN, MScN.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camiletti, Y.A., Alder, R. Learning Needs as Perceived by Women Less Than or Equal to 16 Weeks Pregnant. Can J Public Health 90, 229–232 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404121

Navigation