Skip to main content
Log in

Cancer Coverage in Mass-circulating Canadian Women’s Magazines

  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mass media can inform health beliefs and shape cancer control behaviours. This study surveyed cancer coverage in 309 issues of Canadian women’s magazines for the period 1991–1997. Magazines were selected if 1996 revenue >$10 million and circulation >500,000; Canadian Living, Chatelaine, Flare and Homemaker’s met these criteria. The volume of cancer coverage varied significantly by year and by magazine. However, coverage of specific cancers did not reflect their contribution as a cause of cancer death in Canadian women. The percentage of articles on lung cancer was lower and on breast cancer was higher than the percentage of deaths due to these cancers. All magazines had decreased coverage of lung cancer in 1997 compared to 1991. National cancer resource agencies and research initiatives on breast cancer were infrequently mentioned. These results argue for greater partnerships between the media and health educators to enhance balanced dissemination of cancer control information to Canadian women.

Résumé

Les médias peuvent influencer ce que l’on sait sur la santé ainsi que les comportements de lutte contre le cancer. Cette étude a examiné la couverture médiatique du cancer dans 309 numéros de magazines féminins canadiens de 1991 à 1997. Les magazines sélectionnés étaient ceux dont les recettes de 1996 étaient supérieures à 10 millions de dollars et le tirage supérieur à 500 000 exemplaires; Canadian Living, Châtelaine, Flare et Homemaker’s répondaient à ces critères. Il apparaît que la couverture du cancer varie énormément selon l’année et le magazine. Toutefois, la couverture de cancers spécifiques ne correspondait pas à la place qu’ils occupent comme cause de décès par cancer chez les Canadiennes. Ainsi, le pourcentage d’articles sur le cancer du poumon était inférieur et celui sur le cancer du sein supérieur aux pourcentages de décès par ces cancers. Tous les magazines avaient diminué leur couverture du cancer du poumon en 1997 par comparaison à 1991. Les organismes nationaux de ressources contre le cancer et les initiatives de recherche sur le cancer du sein étaient rarement cités. Ces résultats plaident en faveur d’un plus grand partenariat entre les médias et les éducateurs en santé pour accroître la diffusion équilibrée de l’information sur la lutte contre le cancer auprès des Canadiennes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rogers EM. The diffusion of innovations perspective. In: Weinstein ND (Ed.), Taking Care: Understanding and Encouraging Self-protective Behavior. Cambridge University Press, UK, 1987;79–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Tyler TR, Cook FL. The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984;47:691–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Snyder LB, Rouse RA. The media can have more than an impersonal impact: The case of AIDS risk perceptions and behavior. Health Commun 1995;7:125–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kingle RS, Aune KS. Effects of a daytime serial and a public service announcement in promoting cognitions, attitudes, and behaviors related to bone-marrow testing. Health Commun 1994;6:225–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hafstad A, Aarø LE. Activating interpersonal influence through provocative appeals: Evaluation of a mass media-based antismoking campaign targeting adolescents. Health Commun 1997;9:253–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meissner HI, Potosky AL, Convissor R. How sources of health information relate to knowledge and use of cancer screening exams. J Community Health 1992;17:153–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson JD, Meischke H. Differences in the evaluations of communication sources by women who have had a mammogram. J Psychosoc Oncology 1993;11:83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Murray M, McMillan CL. Gender differences in perceptions of cancer. J Cancer Educ 1993;8:53–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Flora JA, Maibach EW, Maccoby N. The role of media across four levels of health promotion intervention. Annu Rev Public Health 1989;10:181–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moyer A, Greener S, Beauvais J, Salovey P. Accuracy of health research reported in the popular press: Breast cancer and mammography. Health Commun 1995;7:147–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffman-Goetz L, Gerlach KK, Marino C, Mills SL. Cancer coverage and tobacco-advertising in African-American women’s popular magazines. J Community Health 1997;22:261–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerlach KK, Marino C, Weed DL, Hoffman-Goetz L. Lack of colon cancer coverage in seven women’s magazines. Women & Health 1997;26:59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerlach KK, Marino C, Hoffman-Goetz L. Cancer coverage in women’s magazines: What information are women receiving? J Cancer Educ 1997;12:240–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman-Goetz L. Cancer experiences of African American women as portrayed in popular mass magazines. Psycho-Oncology 1999;8(1) In press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bolla PA. Media images of women and leisure: An analysis of magazine advertisements, 1964–87. Leisure Studies 1990;9:241–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clarke JN. Media portrayal of disease from the medical, political economy, and life-style perspectives. Qualitative Health Res 1991;1:287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke JN. Cancer, heart disease, and AIDS: What do the media tell us about these diseases? Health Commun 1992;4:105–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clarke JN. Breast cancer in mass circulating magazines in the U.S.A. and Canada 1974–1995. Women & Health 1999; 28(4) In Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Canadian Magazine Publishers Association. Showing you the money. Masthead April 1997; 10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Norusis MJ. The SPSS Guide to Data Analysis for SPSS. Chicago: SPSS, Inc., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Editorial Mandate, Homemaker’s/Madame au Foyer (promotional material). Telemedia Communications, Inc. Toronto, Ontario, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Government of Canada. Report on the National Forum on Breast Cancer. Ottawa, Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1994, Cat. No. H39/305/994E, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 1997. Toronto, Ontario, 1997, Table 5, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yeaton WH, Smith D, Rogers K. Evaluating understanding of popular press reports of health research. Health Educ Q 1990;17:223–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurie Hoffman-Goetz PhD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffman-Goetz, L., MacDonald, M. Cancer Coverage in Mass-circulating Canadian Women’s Magazines. Can J Public Health 90, 55–59 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404101

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404101

Navigation