Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

L’action structurante de l’utilisation d’un modèle pour la planification de programmes en promotion de la santé

  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Résumé

Cet article a pour objectif de montrer comment l’utilisation d’un modèle en cours de planification d’un programme en promotion de la santé appuie le travail des profes-sionnelles. Prenant appui sur l’évaluation d’implantation d’un logiciel d’aide à la programmation, il développe une métaphore illustrant l’utilisation du modèle PRECEDE-PROCEED. l’analyse a rendu intelligible quatre fonctionnalités du modèle: direction, coordination, articulation et transmission. L’examen de ces fonctionnalités met en évidence l’action structurante du modèle sur l’effort de planification. Dans une démarche future, il serait intéressant d’approfondir ces quatre fonctionnalités, avec ou sans l’aide du logiciel, d’explorer d’autres modèles de planification en promotion de la santé dans leur contexte naturel d’utilisation, et de voir dans quelle mesure ces mêmes fonction-nalités ou d’autres fonctionnalités sont alors mises à contribution.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present results which illustrate the role of the PRECEDE-PROCEED model in the program planning process. Based on the results of an implementation evaluation of the EMPOWER software which supports health programming efforts, we have developed a metaphore to illustrate the use of the model. The following four functions of the model were identified: direction, coordination, articulation and transmission. Analysis of these functions demonstrated the structuring action of the model on planning. It would be interesting to further study how these four functions operate with or without the support of the software, to explore the influence of other health promotion models in their natural settings and to see in which way the same or other functions might be identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliographie

  1. McLeroy KR, Steckler AB, Simons-Morton B, et al. Social science theory in health education: Time for a new model? Health Educ Res 1993;8:305–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hochbaum GM, Lorig K (Eds). Roles and uses of theory in health education practice. Health Educ Q 1992;19:291–403.

  3. Green LW, Glanz K, Hotchbaum GM, et al. Can we build on, or must we replace theories and models in health education? Health Educ Res 1994;9:397–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kok G, Green LW. Research to support health promotion in practice: A plea for increased cooperation. Health Prom Int 1996;5:303–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dean K. Using theory to guide policy relevant health promotion research. Health Prom Int 1996;19:19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dean K, McQueen D. Theory in health promotion: Introduction. Health Prom Int 1996;11:7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nutbeam D. Improving the fit between research and practice in health promotion: Overcoming structural barriers. Can J Public Health 1996;87 suppl. 2:S18–S23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Service C, Salver EJ. Community Health Education: The Lay Advisor Approach. The Community Health Education program, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steckler AB, Orville K, Eng E, Dawson L. Patching It Together: A Formative Evaluation of CDC’s Planned Approach to Community Health (PATCH) Program. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Minkler M. Health education, health promotion and the open society: An historical perspective. Health Educ Q 1989;16:17–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi PH, Freeman HE. Evaluation. A Systemic Approach 4th Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marshall C, Rossman G. Designing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Strauss A, Corbin J (Eds). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huberman AM, Miles MB. Analyse des données qualitatives: Recueil de nouvelles méthodes. Belgique: De Boeck-Wesmael, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haudricourt A-G. La technologie, science humaine. Recherches d’histoire et d’ethnologies des techniques. Paris: Édition des sciences de l’homme Paris, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé (GRIS), Université de Montréal, C.P.6128, succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada

    Michelle Proulx (Agente de recherche, M.Ed., Candidate au doctorat en santé publique) &  Louise Potvin (Chercheure, Professeure)

  2. Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Canada

    Louise Potvin (Chercheure, Professeure)

  3. Conseil d’Évaluation des Technologies de la Santé du Québec (CÉTS), Montréal, Canada

    Pascale Lehoux (Chercheure postdoctorale)

  4. CLSC Pierrefonds, Montréal, Canada

    Esther Gariépy (Infirmière bacchelière)

  5. Direction de la santé publique, Régie régionale de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal-Centre, Montréal, Canada

    Michèle Tremblay (Médecin-Conseil)

Authors
  1. Michelle Proulx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Louise Potvin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pascale Lehoux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Esther Gariépy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michèle Tremblay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise Potvin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proulx, M., Potvin, L., Lehoux, P. et al. L’action structurante de l’utilisation d’un modèle pour la planification de programmes en promotion de la santé. Can J Public Health 90, 23–26 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404093

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404093

Search

Navigation