Skip to main content
Log in

Unpacking Income Inequality and Population Health: The Peculiar Absence of Geography

  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A large and growing body of literature investigating the negative relationship between income inequality and population health (at different geographic scales) has developed over the past several years, although the relationship is not universal apparently. We argue that there has been a peculiar absence of geography in studies of the relationship between income inequality and population health and that explanations for the mixed results have been hampered by an inattention to geography.

Methods

Using methods of spatial pattern visualization, outlier analysis and comparative case study analysis, we investigate the role of “geography” as a means of “unpacking” the relationship between income inequality and health in Canada and the United States.

Results

The findings demonstrate how analyzing the study of income inequality and population health in the context of place makes otherwise obscure patterns visible and opens up new questions and opportunities for investigating how unequal places may be less healthy than more egalitarian ones. Rather than dismissing the importance of income inequality and health because it does not appear to exist at all times and in all places, we raise questions such as: Under what conditions does the relationship between income inequality and population health hold? and What, if anything, is similar about places where it does (or does not) hold? as crucial questions requiring a different kind of analysis than has been common in this literature.

Conclusion

We recommend that place and health studies seek this balance between universalistic and particularistic explanations of place and health relationships in order to best understand the socio-geographic production of health.

Résumé

Contexte

Depuis quelques années, des études toujours plus nombreuses portent sur la relation inverse entre l’inégalité des revenus et la santé des populations (à différentes échelles géographiques), mais cette relation ne semble pas universelle. Nous faisons valoir que les considérations géographiques brillent par leur absence dans les études des liens entre l’inégalité des revenus et la santé des populations, et que les explications des résultats mitigés de ces études souffrent du fait qu’on ne tient pas compte de la géographie.

Méthode

À l’aide de techniques de visualisation des structures spatiales, d’analyse des valeurs aberrantes et d’analyse comparative d’études de cas, nous avons étudié le rôle de la géographie comme moyen de « dégrouper » les liens entre l’inégalité des revenus et la santé au Canada et aux États-Unis.

Résultats

Notre analyse des études sur l’inégalité des revenus et la santé des populations dans le contexte du lieu a mis au jour des structures qui autrement seraient restées dans l’ombre et dégagé de nouvelles questions et de nouvelles pistes de recherche pour comprendre de quelle façon les lieux où les inégalités sont importantes peuvent être moins sains que les lieux égalitaires. Plutôt que de minimiser l’importance de l’inégalité des revenus pour la santé parce qu’un lien ne semble pas exister en tout temps et en tous lieux, nous sommes convaincus que certaines questions sont d’une importance cruciale et méritent une analyse différente de celle que l’on trouve dans les études sur le sujet. Ces questions sont les suivantes: Dans quelles conditions y a-t-il bel et bien un lien entre l’inégalité des revenus et la santé des populations? Et quelles sont les similitudes, le cas échéant, entre les lieux où un tel lien est présent (ou absent)?

Conclusion

Nous recommandons que les études sur le lieu et la santé cherchent à atteindre un équilibre entre les explications universelles et particulières des liens entre le lieu et la santé, afin d’accroître notre connaissance des mécanismes sociogéographiques de production de la santé.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaplan GA, Pamuk ER, Lynch JW, et al. Inequality in income and mortality in the United States: analysis of mortality and potential pathways. BMJ 1996;312:999–1003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy BP, Kawachi I, Prothrow-Stith D. Income distribution and mortality: cross-sectional ecological study of the Robin Hood index in the United States. BMJ 1996;312:1004–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Pamuk ER, et al. Income inequality and mortality in metropolitan areas of the United States. Am J Public Health 1998;88:1074–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Shlomo Y, White IR, Marmot M. Does the variation in the socioeconomic characteristics of an area affect mortality? BMJ 1996;312:1013–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mackenbach JP. Income inequality and population health: evidence favouring a negative correlation between income inequality and life expectancy has disappeared. BMJ 2002;324:1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lynch J, Smith GD, Harper S, et al. Is income inequality a determinant of population health? Part 1. A systematic review. Milbank Q 2004;82(1):5–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lynch J, Harper S, Kaplan GA, Davey Smith G. Associations between income inequality and mortality among US states: the importance of time period and source of income data. Am J Public Health 2005;95(8):1424–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilkinson RG, Pickett KE. Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence. Soc Sci Med 2006; in press

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ram, R. Income inequality, poverty, and population health: evidence from recent data for the United States. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:2568–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Soja, E. Postmodern Geographies: the Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ross NA, Wolfson MC, Dunn JR, et al. Relation between income inequality and mortality in Canada and in the United States: cross sectional assessment using census data and vital statistics. BMJ 2000;320:898–902.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilkinson RG. Income distribution and life expectancy. BMJ 1992;304:165–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodgers GB. Income and inequality as determinants of mortality: an international cross-section analysis. Popul Studies 1979;33:343–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lynch JW, Smith GD, Hillemeier M, et al. Income inequality, the psychosocial environment, and health: comparisons of wealthy nations. Lancet 2001;358:194–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilkinson RG. Unhealthy Societies: the Afflictions of Inequality. London: Routledge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Waldmann RJ. Income distribution and infant mortality. Q J Econom 1992;107:1283–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilkinson RG. Income inequality and population health. BMJ 2002;324:978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mellor JM, Milyo J. Reexamining the evidence of an ecological association between income inequality and health. J Health Polit Policy Law 2001;26(3):487–521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Soobader M-J, LeClere FB. Aggregation and the measurement of income inequality: effects on morbidity. Soc Sci Med 1999;48(6):733–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Income inequality and health: What does the literature tell us? Ann Rev Public Health 2000;21:543–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lynch J, Harper S, Davey Smith G. Commentary. Plugging leaks and repelling boarders—where to next for the SS income inequality? Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:1029–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ross NA, Lynch JW. Commentary. The contingencies of income inequality and health: reflections on the Canadian experience. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:318–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Duncan, JS. Place. In: Johnston RJ, Gregory D, Pratt G, Watts M, eds. Dictionary of Human Geography, 4th ed. London: Blackwell, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. The relationship of income inequality to mortality: Does the choice of indicator matter? Soc Sci Med 1997;45(7):1121–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shibuya K, Hashimoto H, Yano E. Individual income, income distribution, and self rated health in Japan; cross sectional analysis of nationally representative sample. BMJ 2002;324:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Osler M, Prescott E, Grønbæk M, et al. Income inequality, individual income, and mortality in Danish adults: analysis of pooled data from two cohort studies. BMJ 2002;324:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sayer A. Method in Social Science: a Realist Approach, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Harvey D. From space to place and back again: reflections on the condition of postmodernity. In: Bird J, Curtis B, Putnam T, et al, eds. Mapping the Futures. New York: Routledge. 1992; 5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dunn JR, Frohlich K, Ross NA, et al. Role of geography in inequalities in health and human development. In: Heymann J, Hertzman C, Barer M, Evans RG, eds. Healthier Societies: From Analysis to Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lynch J, Smith GD, Harper S, Hillemeier M. Is income inequality a determinant of population health? Part 2. U.S. National and regional trends in income inequality and age- and cause-specific mortality. Milbank Q 2004;2(2):355–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Abraido-Lanza AF, Dohrenwend BP, Ng-Mak DS, Turner JB. The Latino mortality paradox: a test of the “salmon bias” and healthy migrant hypotheses. Am J Public Health 1999;89(10):1543–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Abraido-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Florez KR. Do healthy behaviors decline with greater acculturation? Implications for the Latino mortality paradox. Soc Sci Med 2005;61(6):1243–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Statistics Canada. Community Profile for Prince George Census Agglomeration. Available at: https://doi.org/www.statcan.ca. Accessed December 15, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gee EM, Kobayashi KM, Prus SG. Examining the healthy immigrant effect in mid- to later life: findings from the Canadian Community Health Survey. Can J Aging 2004;23(Suppl 1):s61–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McDonald JT, Kennedy S. Insights into the “healthy immigrant effect”: health status and health service use of immigrants to Canada. Soc Sci Med 2004;59(8):1613–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ali JS, McDermott S, Gravel RG. Recent research on immigrant health from Statistics Canada’s population surveys. Can J Public Health 2004;95(3):I9–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen J, Ng E, Wilkins R. The health of Canada’s immigrants in 1994–95. Health Rep 1996;7(4):33–45. 37–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ross NA, Dorling D, Dunn JR, et al. Metropolitan income inequality and working age mortality: a cross-sectional analysis using comparable data from five countries. J Urban Health 2005;2(1):101–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James R. Dunn PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunn, J.R., Schaub, P. & Ross, N.A. Unpacking Income Inequality and Population Health: The Peculiar Absence of Geography. Can J Public Health 98 (Suppl 1), S10–S17 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403722

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403722

MeSH terms

Navigation