Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 90, Supplement 1, pp S7–S10 | Cite as

Toward a Lexicon of Population Health

  • James R. DunnEmail author
  • Michael V. Hayes
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Despite its undeniable currency in research and policy circles, there remains considerable confusion about what ‘population health’ is. We propose a lexicon for population health in the hope of clarifying issues and advancing this important research emphasis and policy agenda. It distinguishes population health in its literal meaning from a population health perspective, population health research, a population health framework, and a population health approach to policy. Population health is more than just thinking in aggregate terms or about identifying vulnerable or at-risk subpopulations. A population health perspective is fundamentally concerned with the social nature of health influences. The social structures that shape health experiences transcend the characteristics or actions of any one individual, providing population health with analytic advantages over individualistic-oriented approaches to health and to health policy.

Abrégé

Malgré son indéniable popularité dans les milieux de la recherche et de la politique, ce qu’est la « santé de la population » reste très confus. Nous proposons un lexique sur la santé de la population dans l’espoir de clarifier les questions et faire avancer cet important sujet d’intérêt en recherche et dans l’agenda politique. Il distingue santé de la population, dans sa signification littérale, de perspective en santé de la population, recherche en santé de la population, cadre d’analyse en santé de la population et approche de recherche et politique en santé de la population. La santé de la population signifie plus que réfléchir en termes agrégés ou qu’identifier les populations vulnérables ou à risque. Une perspective en santé de la population est fondamentalement concernée par la nature sociale des influences sur la santé. Les structures sociales définissant les expériences de santé transcendent les caractéristiques ou actions de tout individu, procurant à la santé de la population des avantages analytiques sur les approches individualistes de la santé et des politiques de santé.

References

  1. 1.
    Frankish J, Veenstra G, Moulton G. Population Health in Canada: A Working Paper. Prepared for the National Conference on Shared Responsibility for Health and Social Impact Assessments by The Institute of Health Promotion Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, April 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Health Canada. Press release by the Federal, Provincial and Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health, January 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Green LW. Refocusing health care systems to address both individual care and population health. Clin Invest Med 1994;17(2):133–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saunders LD, Wanke MI, Noseworthy TW, Shores SJ. Identification and Assessment of the Current Status of Population Health Research in Canada and Identified Countries. Report prepared for the Federal, Provincial and Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health, Health Canada, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dean K (Ed.). Population Health Research: Linking Theory and Methods. London: Sage Publications, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anonymous. Population health looking upstream. Lancet 1993;343(8895):429–30.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hayes MV, Foster LT, Foster HD. The Determinants of Population Health: A Critical Assessment. Victoria: University of Victoria, Western Geographical Series No. 29, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Labonte R. Population health and health promotion: What do they have to say to each other? Can J Public Health 1995;86(3):165–68.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coburn D, Poland B, Eakin J, et al. The CIAR vision of the determinants of health: A critique. Can J Public Health 1996;87(5):308–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poland B, Coburn D, Eakin J, et al. Wealth, equity and health care: A critique of a ‘population health’ perspective on the determinants of health. Soc Sci Med 1998;46(7):785–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Love R, Jackson L, Edwards R, Pederson A. Gender and its Relationship with Other Determinants of Health. Paper presented at the Fifth Health Promotion Research Conference, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, July 4–l5, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evans RG, Stoddart GL. Producing health, consuming health care. Soc Sci Med 1990;31(12):1347–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR (Eds.). Why Are Some People Healthy and Others Not? New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dædalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1994;123(4). Theme issue: ‘Health and Wealth’.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amick BC, Levine S, Tarlov AR, Walsh DC (Eds.). Society and Health. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blane D, Brunner E, Wilkinson R (Eds.). Health and Social Organization. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilkinson RG. Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Egolf B, Lasker J, Wolf S, Potvin L. The Roseto effect: A 50-year comparison of mortality rates. Am J Public Health 1992;82(8):1089–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lasker JN, Egolf BP, Wolf S. Community social change and mortality. Soc Sci Med 1994;39(1):53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wolf S, Bruhn JG. The Power of Clan: The Influence of Human Relationships on Heart Disease. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G. Smoking and deprivation: Are there neighbourhood effects? Soc Sci Med 1999;48(4):497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anderson RT, Sorlie P, Backlund E, et al. Mortality effects of community socioeconomic status. Epidemiology 1996;8:42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GJ, Aber JL. Neighborhood Poverty: Context and Consequences For Children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1998.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Diez-Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Muntaner C, et al. Neighborhood environments and coronary heart disease: A multilevel analysis. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146(1):48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Duncan C, Jones K. Individuals and their ecologies: Analysing the geography of chronic illness within a multi-level modeling framework. Health and Place 1995;1(1):27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Haynes R, Bentham G, Lovett A, Eimermann J. Effect of labour market conditions on reporting of limiting long term illness and permanent sickness in England and Wales. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997;51:283–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kennedy BP, Kawachi I, Glass R, Prothrow-Stith D. Income distribution, socioeconomic status, and self-rated health in the United States: Multilevel analysis. Br Med J 1998;317:917–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Pamuk E, et al. Income inequality and mortality in metropolitan areas of the United States. Am J Public Health 1998;88(7):1074–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kaplan GA. People and places: Contrasting perspectives on the association between social class and health. Int J Health Services 1996;26(3):507–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Phillimore P, Morris D. Discrepant legacies: Premature mortality in two industrial towns. Soc Sci Med 1991;33(2):139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Waitzman NJ, Smith KR. Separate but lethal: The effects of economic segregation on mortality in metropolitan America. The Milbank Quarterly 1998;76(3):341–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wilkinson RG. The epidemiological transition: From material scarcity to social disadvantage? Dædalus 1994;123(4):61–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yen IH, Kaplan G. Poverty area residence and changes in depression and perceived health status: Evidence from the Alameda County Study. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28:90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sayer A. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lynch J, Kaplan G. Understanding how inequality in the distribution of income affects health. J Health Psych 1997;2(3):297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Macintyre S. The Black Report and beyond: What are the issues? Soc Sci Med 1997;44(6):723–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Muntaner C, Lynch JW. Income inequality and social cohesion versus class relations: A critique of Wilkinson’s neo-Durkheimian research program. Int J Health Services 1998;29:59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Department of Health Care & EpidemiologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of GeographySimon Fraser UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations