Skip to main content
Log in

Dust suppression in iron ore processing plants

  • Invited Feature
  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Handling taconite pellets produces dust. As the pellets are transported, they abrade and produce a fine material that represents a concern for airborne dust. Pellet-breakdown studies revealed that as much as 43% (by weight) of the fine particles were 10 μm in diameter and smaller (material regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). This is a significant amount of material that represents a concern for dust emissions; therefore, a dust suppressant is needed. Water is the most common dust suppressant used to prevent fines from becoming airborne. To effectively suppress dust, the material must wet well and must remain wet. Surfactants, hygroscopic materials and binders are additives that address at least one of these concerns. Evaluating the wetting behavior of the iron ore revealed that the pellets were highly hydrophilic (contact angles less than 30°). The wetting kinetics of fine particles were increased 99% using acetyletic glycol surfactants, which demonstrated that these surfactants greatly improved wettability. However, in dust-suppression studies using a drop tower that simulated dust generation in a plant, surfactants did not reduce airborne dust. This indicated that ease of wetting was not the primary problem in suppressing taconite dust. In contrast, hygroscopic materials (that prevent moisture from evaporating) and tall oil pitch (a nonhygroscopic binder) reduced airborne dust by as much as 58%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamson, A.W., and Gast, A.P., 1997, Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM E3, 2001, “Standard guide for preparation of metallographic specimens,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 03.01, Metals Test Methods and Analytical Procedures, Metals, Mechanical testing, elevated and low-temperature tests, Metallography, pp. 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Chander, S., Mohal, B.R., and Apian, F.F., 1986, “Wetting characteristics of particles and their significance in dust abatement,” Presented at the International Symposium on Respirable Dust in the Mineral Industries, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, Oct. 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristovici, M.A., 1991, “Investigation to control mine dust using surfactants and a new approach for eliminating their negative effect on flotation,” Minerals & Metallurgical Processing, Vol. 8, No. 1, Feb., pp. 38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Draves, C.Z., and Clarkson, R.G., 1931, “A new method for the evaluation of wetting agents,” Proceedings of American Association of Textile Chemist & Colorist, Vol. 20, pp. 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, W.C., 1949, “Classification of surface-active agents by ‘HLB’,” Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists, Vol. 1, p. 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaycock, M.J., and Parfitt, G.D., 1981, Chemistry of Interfaces, Elliss Horwood Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, B., Lindman, B., Homberg, K., and Kronberg, B., 1998, Surfactants and Polymers in Aqueous Solution, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. West Sussex England, pp. 459–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., 1995, “Respirable Coal Dust Control Using Surfactants—With Special Emphasis On a Liquid Spray System,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Missouri — Rolla, Rolla, Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrick, T., 1970, “Water as a Control Method State of the Art Sprays and Wetting Agents,” U.S. Bureau of Mines, Information Circular 8458, pp. 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugliakov, P.M. (Petr Maksimovich), 2000, Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance of Surfactants and Solid Particles: Physicochemical Aspects and Applications, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohal, B.R., 1988, “Enhancement of the Wettability of Coal Powders Using Surfactants,” Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S.R., 2004, Surface Chemistry of Froth Flotation, Revised 2nd Edition, First Edition: L.J. Kluwer, Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, New York, Vol. 2, pp. 351–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2004, www.epa.gov, Date of Access: Nov. 20, 2004, Search PM10 and PM2.5

  • Walker, Jr., P.L., Peterson, E.E., and Wright, C.C., 1952, “Surface active agent phenomena in dust abatement,” Ind. and Eng. Chem., Vol. 44, pp. 2389–2393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Copeland, C.R., Kawatra, S.K. Dust suppression in iron ore processing plants. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 22, 177–191 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403321

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403321

Key words

Navigation