Abstract
It is well recognized that machine type and machine characteristics play vital roles in the successful application of froth flotation in mineral processing. Since the early 1900s, a multitude of machine designs have been and are still being introduced in an attempt to improve flotation efficiency. Machines based on mechanical agitation have been the most dominant in industrial practice. However, in recent years there has been a growing interest in pneumatic flotation units because of their claimed simplicity, low cost, high throughput and good metallurgical performance. This work was carried out to assess the effectiveness of pneumatic flotation on a magnetite ore. The method was applied using a prototype pneumatic flotation device that utilized a suitable nozzle for bubble generation. Important variables of the process were examined and optimized, including the nozzle size, air flow rate and froth thickness. Further tests were conducted to determine the influence of frother dosage and to explore the improvements that could be made on concentrate grade and recovery by cleaning and scavenging. Under the best test conditions, an iron concentrate was obtained with a grade of 66.4% Fe and a recovery of 97.7%. Particularly, the recovery was superior in comparison to that of mechanical flotation. This was attributed to the ability of pneumatic flotation to create and maintain a relatively thick froth layer.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brewis, T., 1991, “Flotation Cells,” Mining Magazine, Vol. 164, No. 6, pp. 383–393.
Brewis, T., 1996, “Flotation Cells,” Mining Magazine, Vol. 175, No. 1, pp. 18–24.
Claridge, P.G., Holmes G.P., and Redfearn, M.A., 1989, “Flotation,” In Operation and Maintenance in Mineral Processing Plants, P.G. Claridge, ed., CIM, Montreal, pp. 267–290.
Colombo, A.F., and Frommer, D.W., 1976, “Cationic flotation of Mesabi Range oxidized taconite,” In Flotation - A.M. Gaudin Memorial Volume, M.C. Fuerstenau, ed., Vol. 2, New York: AIME, pp. 1285–1304.
Deister Concentrator Company, 2000, http://www.deisterconcentrator.com/mineral/flotaire/index.html
Houot, R., 1983, “Beneficiation of iron ore by flotation — Review of industrial and potential applications,” International Journal of Mineral Processing, Vol. 10, pp. 183–204.
Iwasaki, I., 1983, “Iron ore flotation, theory and practice.” Mining Engineering, Vol.35, No. 6, pp. 622–631.
Kennedy, A., 1990, “The Jameson flotation cell.” Mining Magazine, Vol. 163, No. 4, pp. 281–285.
Mining Technology, 2000a, http://www.mining-technology.com/contractors/fittering/minpro/
MiningTechnology 2000b, http://www.mining-technology.com/projects/zinkgruvan/ zinkgruvan2.html
Poling, G.W., 1980, “Selection and sizing of flotation machines,” In Mineral Processing Plant Design, 2nd Ed., A.L. Mularand R.B. Bhappu, eds., New York: SME of AIME, pp. 887–906.
Taggart, A.F., 1945, Handbook of Mineral Dressing, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Villar, J.W., and Dawe, G.A., 1975, “The Tilden mine — a new processing technique for iron ore,” Mining Congress Journal, Vol. 61, No. 10, pp. 40–48.
Yalcin, T., 1985, “Estimation of liberation,” In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting Canadian Mineral Processors, Ottawa, Jan. 1995, pp. 557–569.
Yalcin, T., 1992, “Magnetoflotation: development and laboratory assessment.” International Journal of Mineral Processing, Vol. 34, pp. 119–132.
Yalcin, T., 1993, “Iron ore concentration by magnetoflotation” In Proceedings of the XVIII International Mineral Processing Congress, Sydney, Australia, May 1993, Parkville, Victoria, The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp. 711–718.
Young, P., 1982, “Flotation machines,” Mining Magazine, Vol. 146, No. 1, pp. 35–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yalcin, T. Testing of pneumatic flotation in iron ore processing. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 18, 184–189 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403247
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403247