Skip to main content
Log in

Gyratory crusher model and impact parameters related to energy consumption

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this research was to develop a mathematical model for gyratory crushers to help in the prediction of energy consumption and to analyze dominant parameters that affect this energy consumption. The development of a gyratory crusher model was achieved in the following three main stages: mathematical representation and coding of the crushing process; building an amperage constant model to derive an energy-scaling formula; and modifying the amperage constant model to represent a full-scale model. Due to their significant influence on feed-size distributions, two blasting parameters, i.e., burden and spacing, were considered. The crusher parameters that affect energy consumption were also identified. A case study of an operating dolomite mine was performed. The results indicated that by changing the burden, spacing and crusher closed-side setting, the overall (blasting and crushing) costs could be reduced by 4.7% to 7.9% annually. It can also be concluded that burden and spacing values have a linear positive relationship with the crusher energy consumption, while closed-side setting values have an inverse linear relationship with the energy consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.S., 1988, “Development of a Cone Crusher Model,” M.S. Thesis, University of Queensland (JKMRC), Australia, pp. 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., and Napier-Munn, T.J., 1988, “Power prediction for cone crushers,” Proc. Third Mill Operators Conference, AusIMM, Cobar, NSW, Australia, pp. 230–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, R.L., 1963, “The mechanics of rock breakage: standards for blast design,” Pit and Quarry, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 118–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, L.G., and Klimpel, R.R., 1964, “Theory of grinding operations,” Ind. Eng. Chem., Vol. 56, pp. 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, L.G., andBrame, K., 1983, “A comparison of the bond method for sizing wet tumbling mills with a size mass balance simulation model,” Powder Technology Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awachie, S.E.A., 1983, “Development of Crusher Models Using Laboratory Breakage Data,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Queensland, JKMRC, Australia, pp. 25–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beke, B., 1964, Principles of Comminution, Maclaren, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, F.C., 1952, “The third theory of comminution,” Trans. SME/ AIME, pp. 484–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C.V.B., 1983, “Fragmentation estimations and Kuz-Ram model-four years on,” Proceedings of the First Int. Symp. on Hock Fragmentation and Blasting, Sweden, pp. 439–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, B., 1948, “Logarithmico-normal distributions in breakage of solids,” Ind. Eng. Chem., Vol. 40, pp. 2289–2291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillaneau, J.C., Ollofsson, O., Durance, M.V., and Villeneuve, J., 1995, “Modeling of the Sala Agitated mill using BRGMpilotplant data,” Proceedings of XXVAPCOM, pp. 325–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, J.A., and Fuerstenau, D.W., 1968, “The zero order production of fines in comminution and its implications in simulation,” Tran. SME/AIME, Vol. 241, pp. 531–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, J.A., and Fuerstenau, D.W., 1980, “Scale up procedure for continuous grinding mill design using population balance models,” Institute of Mining Proceedings, Vol. 7, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst J.A., Chang L.Y., and Flintoff, B., 2003, “Size reduction and liberation,” Principles of Mineral Processing, M.C. Fuerstenau and K.N. Han, eds., SME, Littleton, Colorado, pp. 61–81.

  • Hukki R.T., 1961, “Proposal forsolomonic settlement between the theories of Von Rittinger, Rick and Bond,” Trans SME/AIME, pp. 403–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, R., 2003, “Particlecharacterization,” Principles of Mineral Processing, M.C. Fuerstenau and K.N. Han, eds., SME, Littleton, Colorado, pp. 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, T., and Okaya, K., 1994, “Grinding mechanism in centrifugal mills,” 8th European Symposium on Comminution, Stockholm, pp. 431–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawatra, S.K, Eisele, T.C., and Wlaqui, H.J., 2001, “Optimization of comminution circuit throughput and product size distribution by simulation and control,” https://doi.org/www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/837186-Yhbgdr/native/837186.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsall, D.F., Reid, K.J., and Stewart, P.S.B., 1969, “The study of grinding processes by dynamic modeling,” Electronic Engineering Trans. Inst., EE5(1), pp. 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R.P., 1979, “A model for the quantitative estimation of mineral liberation by grinding,” Institute Journal for Mining, pp. 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, M., and Sotkovszki, P., 2003, “Work hardening in cone crusher liners,” <https://doi.org/www.web.sagmilling.nsf/Articles/691 CC7491 F79F1 FA872 56DA8006214DC>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, A.J., 1977, Mineral Crushing and Grinding Circuits: Their Simulation, Optimization and Control, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

  • Mishra, B.K., and Rajamani, R.K., 1992, “Analysis of media motion in a ball mill,” Comminution: Theory and Practice,” K. Kawatra, ed., SME, Littleton, Colorado, pp. 427–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, S., Napier-Munn, T.J., and Andersen J., 1992, “The Prediction of power draw for comminution machines,” Comminution: Theory and Practice, K. Kawatra, ed., SME, Littleton, Colorado, pp. 405–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mular, A.L., Halbe D.N., and Barrett D.J., 2002, Mineral Processing Plant Design, Practice, and Control, Proceedings, Vol.1, SME, Littleton, pp. 584–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier- Munn, T.J., Morrell, S., Morrison, R.D., and Kojovic, T., 1996, Mineral Comminution Circuits: Their Operation and Optimization, Vol. 45, JKMRC, Brisbane.

  • Narayanan, S.S., and Whiten, W.J., 1988, “Determination of comminution characteristics from single particle breakage tests and its application to ball mill scale-up,” Trans of Inst of Min. and Metali, 245, C115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pothina, R., 2006, “A Gyratory Crusher Model for Energy Savings,” M.S. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radziszewski, P., and Tarasiewicz, S., 1989, “Autogenous mill design using comminution energetics,” Proc. Conference on SAG ’89, Vancouver, pp. 773–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosario, P.P., Hall, R.A., and Maijer, D.M., 2004a, “Improved gyratory crushing operation by the assessment of liner wear and mantle profile redesign,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 11–12, pp. 1083–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosario, P.P., Hall, R.A., and Maijer, D.M., 2004b, “Liner wear and performance investigation of primary gyratory crushers,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 11–12, pp. 1241–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosario, P.P., and Hall, R.A., 2006, “Integration of gyratory crusher liner wear and operational performance for better crusher management,” CIM Bulletin, Vol. 99 (1095), pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svedensten P., and Evertsson V., 2001, Computer assisted optimisation of crushing plants for both machine parameter and wear tolerances, https://doi.org/www.mvs.chalmers.se/≈psvede

    Google Scholar 

  • ThyssenKrupp, 2005, Gyratory Crushers, <http://www. eprocessingplants.com/eng/html/kreiselbrecher. en.shtml>, pp.1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergne, J.D.L, 2005, Hard rock miner’s handbook rules of thumb, <https://doi.org/www.mcintoshengineer-ing.com/Hard%20Rock%20Handbook/hardrock. htm>

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energ., 2000, “Mineral Processing Technology Road Map,” U.S. Department of Energy, <https://doi.org/www.eere.energy.gov/indus-try/mining/>.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Paper number MMP-06-058. Discussion of this peer-reviewed and approved paper is invited and must be submitted to SME Publications Dept. prior to Feb. 29, 200S.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pothina, R., Kecojevic, V., Klima, M.S. et al. Gyratory crusher model and impact parameters related to energy consumption. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 24, 170–180 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403212

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403212

Key Words

Navigation