Skip to main content
Log in

Direct acid elution of anionic exchange resins for uranium recovery

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An effective elution technique has been developed for recovering uranium from ion exchange resins loaded in the carbonate leaching process. The procedure employs direct elution with acid. In comparison with conventional base elution, the procedure yields eluate of higher uranium concentration, results in a more complete elution, keeps the performance of the ion exchange resin at the fresh stage, reduces acid consumption, eliminates carbonate consumption, and reduces waste for disposal. The technique has been successfully demonstrated in the field and patented. It lends itself to commercialization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Merritt, R.C., “The Extractive Metallurgy of Uranium,” Colorado School of Mines Research Institute, Golden, CO, p. 161.

  • Treybal, R.E., 1967, Mass Transfer Operations, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urgell, M. et al., 1958, “Extraction of Uranium from Solution of Sodium Carbonate by Means of Anionic Exchange with Dowex I Resin.” Proceedings, Vol. 3, 2nd United Nations International Conference on the Peaceful Use of Atomic Energy, Geneva, pp. 444–464.

  • Yan, T.Y., 1983, “Direct Acid Elution of Anionic Exchange Resins for Recovery of Uranium,” US Patent 4,423,008, Dec. 27.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

M&MP paper 87–635. Discussion of this paper must be submitted, in duplicate, prior to Jan. 31, 1989.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yan, T.Y. Direct acid elution of anionic exchange resins for uranium recovery. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 5, 232–236 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03402516

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03402516

Navigation