Skip to main content
Log in

Electro-biochemical reactor (EBR) technology for selenium removal from British Columbia’s coal-mining waste waters

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The weathering of coal mine waste rock releases iron, calcium, sulfate and associated trace elements like selenium (Se). Nitrogen species are also found in association with coal-mining drainages mainly due to the leaching of residual blasting compounds. Elevated concentrations of Se are a ubiquitous occurrence in coal-mining environments in British Columbia. A major concern with waterborne Se in British Columbia is the potential for its bioaccumulation in aquatic food chains.

Treatment to remove Se from coal-mining waste waters has proven to be challenging for conventional water-treatment technologies. Compounding this challenge, many streams are characterized by high flows and low selenium concentrations. Conventional membrane and ion exchange treatments produce concentrated brine streams that are difficult to treat or require disposal. Conventional biotreatment systems use excess nutrients to provide the required electrons to compensate for inefficient and variable electron availability, as well as to adjust reactor chemistry.

This paper’s electro-biochemical reactor (EBR) technology provides a controllable and consistent supply of useable electrons to the microbes directly at a low voltage potential (1–3 V) and low current. In this manner, the EBR technology overcomes the shortcomings found in conventional systems, as it reduces the required nutrient addition and provides a more controllable, efficient, economical and robust biotreatment system. Additionally, the EBR process does not produce excess solids or biomass; therefore, solids management post-treatment is not required.

Laboratory EBR bench-scale and on-site pilot-scale systems were used to treat five British Columbia coal-mine waste waters; influent Se concentrations ranged from 35 µg/L to 531 µg/L. Se treatment targets for the tested waters ranged from 5 to 10 µg/L. Mean Se concentrations in EBR effluents ranged from 0.5 µg/L to 1.4 µg/L, while reducing sulfate concentrations. The test data demonstrate that the EBR technology is an effective Se removal option for British Columbia’s coal-mining waste waters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, D.J. and Peoples, M.J., 2010, “New Electro-Biochemical Reactor for Removal of Selenium, Arsenic, and Nitrate” IMWA Sydney, NS.

  • Adams, D.J., Peoples, M.J., and Opara, A., 2012, “A New Electro-Biochemical Reactor (EBR) for Treatment of Wastewaters”, Proceedings of the First International Symposium: Water in Mineral Processing J. Drelich, ed.

  • Auclair, G., Fouquet, Y., and Bohn, M., 1987, “Distribution of Selenium in High-Temperature Hydrothermal Sulfide Deposits at 13° North, East Pacific Rise”, Canadian Mineralogist, Vol. 25, pp. 577–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besser, J.M., Giesy, J.P., Brown, R.W., Buell, J.M., and Dawson, G.A., 1996, “Selenium Bioaccumulation and Hazards in a Fish Community Affected by Coal Fly Ash Effluent”, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Vol. 35, pp. 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K.M. and Arthur, J.R., 2001, “Selenium, selenoproteins and human health: a review”, Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 4, pp. 593–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, J.M., Funk, D.H., and Buchwalter, D.B., 2009, “Selenium Bioaccumulation and Maternal Transfer in the Mayfly Centroptilum triangulifer in a Life-Cycle, Periphyton-Biofilm Troptic Assay”, Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 43, pp. 7952–7957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Naggar, M.Y., and Finkel, S.E., 2013, “Live Wires”, The Scientist May, pp. 38–43.

  • Franks, A., 2012, “What’s Current with Electric Microbes?” Journal of Bacteriology and Parasitology Vol. 3.

  • Gregory, K.B., Bond, D.R., and Lovley, D.R., 2004, “Graphite Electrodes as Electron Donors for Anaerobic Respiration”, Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 6, pp. 596–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovley, D.R., 2008, “Extracellular Electron Transfer: Wires, Capacitors, Iron Lungs, and More”, Geobiology, Vol. 6, pp. 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovley, D.R., 2012, “Electromicrobiology”, Annual Review of Microbiology, Vol. 66, pp. 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, J., Twidwell, L., Park, B., and Fallon, M., 2008, “Removal of Selenium Oxyanions from Industrial Scrubber Waters Utilizing Elemental Iron”, Hydrometallurgy — Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium pp. 140–148.

  • Opara, A., Adams, D.J., and Peoples, M.J., 2013, “Pilot System Successfully Removes Metals, Inorganics” Industrial Water World No. 13.

  • Park, H.I., Kim, D., Choi, Y.J., and Pak, D., 2005, “Nitrate Reduction using an Electrode as Direct Electron Donor in a Biofilm-Electrode Reactor”, Process Biochemistry, Vol. 40, pp. 3383–3388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, M.C., 1911, “Electrical Effects Accompanying the Decomposition of Organic Compounds”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 84, pp. 260–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandy, T., and DiSante, C., 2010, “Review of Available Technologies for the Removal of Selenium from Water”, North American Metals Council June 2010.

  • Strycharz, S.M., Gannon, S.M., Boles, A.R., Franks, A.E., Nevin, K.P., and Lovley, D.R., 2008, “Graphite Electrode as a Sole Electron Donor for Reductive Dechlorination of Tetrachloroethene by Geobacter lovleyi”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 74, pp. 5943–5947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C.D., and Robinson, M.F., 1980, “Selenium in human health and disease with emphasis of those aspects peculiar to New Zealand”, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 33, pp. 303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff, P., and Doudrick, K., 2009, “Nitrates in Groundwater: Treatment Technologies for Today and Tomorrow”, Southwest Hydrology, July/August, pp. 30–37.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Paper number MMP-14-016.

Discussion of this peer-reviewed and approved paper is invited and must be submitted to SME Publications Dept. prior to May 31, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Opara, A., Peoples, M.J., Adams, D.J. et al. Electro-biochemical reactor (EBR) technology for selenium removal from British Columbia’s coal-mining waste waters. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 31, 209–214 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03402472

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03402472

Key words

Navigation