Abstract
Bucknell and Mannion (2007) commented that student responses in the 2006 VCE Outdoor and Environmental Studies (OES) exam could be boiled down to a pat answer of “Indigenous good, non-Indigenous bad” (p. 8). They suggest that the subject of OES is too rich for such a simple answer. This paper uses the expression of ‘Indigenous good/non-Indigenous bad’ as a springboard to explore some of the ways notions of the environment, race and ethnicity intersect and how this might lead to an exam question being answered in such a uniform and simplistic way by some students. The aim of this paper is to highlight some of the productive tensions of environment, race and ethnicity as a strategy for richer and more complex debates around peoples’ interactions with the environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bucknell, C., & Mannion, A. (2007). Relationships with the Australian environment over time: A response to student ideas and answers from the 2006 VCE OES exam. Journeys, February, 8–10.
Buege, D. J. (1996). The ecologically noble savage revisited. Environmental Ethics, 18(1), 71–88.
Dei, G. J. S., Karumanchery, L. L., & Karumanchery-Luik, N. (2004). Playing the race card: Exposing white power and privilege. New York: Peter Lang.
Frankenberg, R. (1997). Introduction: Local whitenesses, localizing whiteness. In R. Frankenberg (Ed.), Displacing whiteness: Essays in social and cultural criticism (pp. 1–33). Durham: Duke University Press.
Gough, A., Pleasants, K., & Black, J. (2006). Outdoor and Environmental Studies: VCE Units 1–4 (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Thomson.
Grande, S. M. A. (1999). Beyond the ecologically noble savage: Deconstructing the white man’s Indian. Environmental Ethics, 21, 309–320.
Hicks, S. (2006). W. E. B. Du Bois, Booker T. Washington, and Richard Wright: Toward an ecocriticism of colour. Callaloo, 29(1), 202–222.
Ignatow, G. (2005). From Science to multiculturalism: Postmodern trends in environmental organisations. Global Environmental Politics, 5(2), 88–113.
Mosley, S. (2006). Common ground: Integrating social and environmental history. Journal of Social History, 39(3), 915–933.
Nayak, A. (2006). After race: Ethnography, race and post-race theory. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29(3), 411–430.
Oles, G. W. A. (1995). ‘Borrowing’ activities from another culture: A Native American’s perspective. In K. Warren, M. Sakofs and J. S. Hunt (Eds.), The theory of experiential education (3rd ed., pp. 195–200). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Reid, A. (2004). Curriculum and democracy. Curriculum Perspectives, 24(3), 59–60.
Semali, L. M., & Kincheloe, J. L. (1999). Introduction: What is Indigenous knowledge and why should we study it? In L. M. Semali and J. L. Kincheloe (Eds), What is Indigenous knowledge? Voices from the academy (pp. 3–57). New York: Falmer Press.
Shahjahan, R. A. (2005). Mapping the field of anti-colonial discourse to understand issues of Indigenous knowledges: Decolonizing praxis. McGill Journal of Education, 40(2), 213–240.
Shaw, W. S. (2006). Decolonizing geographies of whiteness. Antipode, 38(4), 851–869.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
Stewart, A. (2004). Decolonising encounters with the Murray River: Building place responsive outdoor education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 8(2), 46–55.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2005). Outdoor and Environmental Studies: Victorian Certificate of Education Study Design. Melbourne: VCAA.
Warren, K. (1998). A call for race, gender, and class sensitive facilitation in outdoor experiential education. The Journal of Experiential Education, 21(1), 21–25.
Washington, S. J., & Roberts, N. S. (1999). Adventure education for teaching cross-cultural perspectives. In J. C. Miles & S. Priest (Eds.), Adventure programming (pp. 359–364). State College, PA: Venture.
Wattchow, B. (2005). ‘Belonging to proper country’: Australian outdoor education as experiencing relationships in place. In T. J. Dickson, T. Gray & B. Haylar (Eds.). Views from the top: Outdoor and experiential learning (pp. 13–27). Dunedin: Otago University Press.
Williams, R. (1988). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Her research interests include students’ and teachers’ experiences of outdoor education, how contemporary practices of outdoor education come to be seen as normal, particularly in the context of the school curriculum and post-structural research methodology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zink, R. Can we move beyond ‘Indigenous good, non-Indigenous bad’ in thinking about people and the environment?. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 11, 3–9 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400852
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400852