Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 369–388 | Cite as

Individual Behavior Consistencies as Interactive Styles: Their Relation to Personality

  • Emilio Ribes-Iñesta
  • Silvia Sánchez Sosa
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Two experimental studies were carried out in order to find within-subject consistencies as individual differences in a concurrent choice situation simulating risk-taking. In a first experiment, six adults were exposed to different values of probability and numbers of reinforcement in a task involving betting on two simultaneous horse races displayed on a microcomputer monitor. In the second experiment, two subjects were exposed to a within-session replication of the first experiment. The results in both experiments support the reliability of within-subject consistencies when experimental tasks are built as open contingencies. The conceptual and experimental implications of the data are discussed in relation to the study of personality.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ATKINSON, J. W., & FEATHER, N. T. (1966). A theory of achievement motivation. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. GARDNER, R. W., HOLTZMAN, P. S., KLEIN, G. S., LINTON, H. B., & SPENCE, D. P. (1959). Cognitive control. A study of individual consistencies in cognitive behavior. Psychological Issues, 4, 1–185.Google Scholar
  4. GARDNER, R. W., JACKSON, D. N., & MESSICK, S. J. (1960). Personality organization in cognitive control and intellectual abilities. Psychological Issues, 4, 1–149.Google Scholar
  5. HAKE, D. (1982). The basic-applied continuum and the possible evolution of human operant social and verbal research. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. HARZEM, P. (1984). Experimental analysis of individual differences and personality. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. HARZEM, P., LOWE, C. R., & BAGSHAW, M. (1987). Verbal control in human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 28, 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. HAYS, W. L. (1963). Statistics for psychologists. New York: Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  9. KANTOR, J. R. (1924–1926). Principles of psychology. New York: Alfred Knopf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. KLEIN, G. S. (1958). Cognitive control and motivation. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Assessment of human motives. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Co.Google Scholar
  11. MORSE, W. H., & KELLEHER, R. T. (1970). Schedules as fundamental determinants of behavior. In W. N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Theory of reinforcement schedules. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
  12. MURRAY, H. (1943). Thematic apperception test manual. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. RIBES, E. (1985). Human behavior as operant behavior: An empirical or conceptual issue? In C. F. Lowe, M. Richelle, D. E. Blackman, & C. M. Bradshaw (Eds.), Behavior analysis and contemporary psychology. London: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. RIBES, E. (1987). Some thoughts on thinking and its motivation. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 13, 317–326.Google Scholar
  15. RIBES, E., & SANCHEZ, S. (1990). El problema de las diferencias individuates: Un anâlisis conceptual de la personalidad. In E. Ribes (Ed.), Problemas conceptuales en el anâlisis del comportamiento humano. Mexico: Trillas.Google Scholar
  16. RORSCHACH, H. (1921). Psychodiagnostik. Arbetein zur angewandten psychiatrie, Bd., II, Berlin.Google Scholar
  17. RYLE, G. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
  18. SCHOENFELD, W. N., & COLE, B. K. (1972). Stimulus schedules. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  19. SHIMOFF, E., & CATANIA, A. C. (1981). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emilio Ribes-Iñesta
    • 1
  • Silvia Sánchez Sosa
    • 1
  1. 1.University of GuadalajaraChapalita, GuadalajaraMéxico

Personalised recommendations