Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 221–253 | Cite as

Nocturnality as a Defensive Behavior in the Rat: An Analysis in Terms of Selective Association Between Light and Aversive Stimulation

  • Laurie S. Lester
  • Michael S. Fanselow
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

One striking aspect of the rat’s daily activity pattern is its strong nocturnal tendency. The present research tests the assumption that nocturnality in the rat serves a defensive function. If nocturnality represents a form of defense, the rat may associate light with aversive events more readily than it associates dark with aversive events. Experiment 1 examined this hypothesis in terms of the rat’s foraging behavior while living in an operant chamber. Electric footshock delivered to the grid floor near the response lever simulated the influence of predation during feeding. The results indicated that foraging behavior in the rat is sensitive to the risk of predation. Rats that had shock paired with either the light or dark phase reorganized their meal taking and reduced time spent at risk. However, the finding that the largest changes in foraging occurred when shock was delivered exclusively during the dark phase did not support the hypothesis that nocturnal feeding is a defensive behavior and was not indicative of a selective association between light and aversive events. Similar conclusions were reached when the defensive behavior freezing was used as the discriminative response in differential conditioning studies. Rate of differentiation was faster when shock was paired with a dark phase Cs, relative to pairings with a light phase Cs (Experiment 4). Rats failed to show differential freezing in a light S+ chamber and a dark S- chamber (Experiment 2), but did so with S+ and S- conditions reversed. Similar results with a light or dark chamber paired with a food Us (Experiment 3) suggested two things: first, rats that acquired the discrimination when light phase signaled shock may have relied on endogenous cues rather than light/dark per se; second, the results obtained with pairings of darkness and shock were not indicative of a selective association between darkness and aversive events.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ALLISON, J., LARSON, D., & JENSEN, D. D. (1967). Acquired fear, brightness preference, and one-way shuttlebox performance. Psychonomie Science, 8, 269–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASCHOFF, J., HOFFMANN, K., POHL, H., & WEVER, R. (1975). Re-entrainment of circadian rhythms after phase-shifts of the zeitgeber. Chronobiologia, 2, 23–78.Google Scholar
  3. BARNETT, S. A. (1975). The rat. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. BLANCHARD, R. J., & BLANCHARD, D. C. (1971). Defensive reactions in the albino rat. Learning and Motivation, 2, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BLANCHARD, D. C., & BLANCHARD, R. J. (1972). Innate and conditioned reactions to threat in rats with amygdaloid lesions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 81, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BOLLES, R. C. (1970). Species-specific defensive reactions and avoidance learning. Psychological Review, 71, 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BOLLES, R. C., & FANSELOW, M. S. (1980). A perceptual-defensive-recuperative model of fear and pain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BOUTON, M. E., & BOLLES, R. C. (1980). Conditioneel fear assessed by freezing and by the suppression of three different baselines. Animal Learning and Behavior, 8, 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BRONSTEIN, P. M., & HIRSCH, S. M. (1976). The ontogeny of defensive reactions in Norway rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 90, 620–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. COLLIER, G. H. (1981). Determinants of choice. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 29, 69–127.Google Scholar
  11. COLLIER, G. H., HIRSCH, E., & HAMLIN, P. (1972). The ecological determinants of reinforcement in the rat. Physiology and Behavior, 9, 705–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. COLLIER, G. H., HIRSCH, E., & KANAREK, R. (1977). The operant revisited. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. CURIO, E. (1976). The ethology of predation. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DAAN, S. (1981). Adaptive daily strategies in behavior. In J. Asschoff (Ed.), Biological rhythms (pp. 275–298). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DAVIDSON, T. L. (1987). Learning about deprivation intensity stimuli. Behavioral Neuroscience, 101, 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DICKINSON, A., & PEARCE, J. M. (1977). Inhibitory interactions between appetitive and aversive stimuli. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 690–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EDMUNDS, M. (1974). Defence in animals. Essex: Longmans.Google Scholar
  18. EDWARDS, A. L. (1972). Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  19. FANSELOW, M. S. (1980). Conditioned and unconditioned components of post-shock freezing in rats. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Sciences, 15, 177–182.Google Scholar
  20. FANSELOW, M. S. (1981). Naloxone and Pavlovian fear conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 12, 398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. FANSELOW, M. S. (1982). The post-shock activity burst. Animal Learning and Behavior; 10, 448–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FANSELOW, M. S. (1984). Opiate modulation of the active and inactive components of the postshock reaction: Parallels between naloxone pretreatment and shock intensity. Behavioral Neuroscience, 98, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. FANSELOW, M. S. (1986). Associative vs. topographical accounts of the immediate shock freezing deficit in rats: Implications for the response selection rules governing species specific defensive reactions. Learning & Motivation, 17, 16–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. FANSELOW, M. S. (1989). The adaptive function of conditioned defensive behavior: An ecological approach to pavlovian stimulus substitution theory. In R. J. Blanchard, P. F. Brain, D. C. Blanchard, & S. Parmigiani (Eds.), Ethoexperimental Approaches to the Study of Behavior (pp. 151–166), Nato Asi Series D, Vol. 48. Boston: Kluver Academie Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. FANSELOW, M. S., & BAACKES, M. P. (1982). Conditioned fear-induced opiate analgesia on the formalin test: Evidence for two aversive motivational Systems. Learning and Motivation, 13, 200–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. FANSELOW, M. S., & BOLLES, R. C. (1979). Naloxone and shock-elicited freezing in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 93, 736–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. FANSELOW, M. S., & LESTER, L. S. (1988). A functional behavioristic approach to aversively motivated behavior: Predatory imminence as a determinant of the topography of defensive behavior. In R. C. Bolles & M. D. Beecher (Eds.), Evolution and learning (pp. 185–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. FANSELOW, M. S., LESTER, L S., & HELMSTETTER, F. J. (1988). Changes in feeding and foraging patterns as an antipredator defensive strategy: A laboratory simulation using aversive stimulation in a closed economy. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 361–374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. GARCIA, J., & KOELLING, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomie Science, 4, 123–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. GOODKIN, F. (1976). Rats learn the relationship between responding and environmental events: An expansion of the learned helplessness hypothesis. Learning and Motivation, 7, 382–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. HEARST, E., & JENKINS, H. M. (1974). Sign-tracking: The stimuius-reinforcer relation and directed action. Austin, TX: Psychonomie Society.Google Scholar
  32. HIRSCH, S. M., & BOLLES, R. C. (1980). On the ability of prey to recognize predators. Zietschrift fur Tierpsycholiogie, 54, 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. JACOBS, W. J., & LOLORDO, V. M. (1977). The sensory basis of avoidance responding in the rat. Relative dominance of auditory or visual warning signals and safety signals. Learning and Motivation, 8, 448–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. JACOBS, W. J., & LOLORDO, V. M. (1980). Constraints on Pavlovian aversive conditioning: Implications for avoidance learning in the rat. Learning and Motivation, 11, 427–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. JENKINS, H. M. (1973). Noticing and responding in a discrimination based on a distinguishing element. Learning and Motivation, 4, 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. JENSEN, G. B., COLLIER, G. H., & MEDVIN, M. B. (1983). A cost-benefit analysis of nocturnal feeding in the rat. Physiology and Behavior, 31, 555–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. KRUUK, H. (1972). The spotted hyaena. Chicago and London: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  38. LESTER, L. S., & FANSELOW, M. S. (1985). Exposure to a cat produces opioid analgesia in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 99, 756–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. LEVITSKY, D. A. (1970). Feeding patterns of rats in response to fasts and changes in environmental conditions. Physiology and Behavior, 5, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. LOLORDO, V. M. (1979). Selective associations. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.), Mechanisms of learning and motivation (pp. 367–398). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. LOLORDO, V. M., & JACOBS, W. J. (1983). Constraints on aversive conditioning in the rat: Some theoretical accounts. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.), Advances in analysis of behavior: Vol. 3. Biological factors in learnino (pp 325–350). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. MAATSCH, J. L. (1959). Learning and fixation after a single shock trial. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 52, 408–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MASTERSON, F. A., & CRAWFORD, M. (1982). The defense motivational System: A theory of avoidance behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 661–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. MEYER, D. R., CHO, C., & WESEMANN, A. F. (1960). On problems of conditioning discriminated lever press avoidance responses. Psychological Review, 67, 224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’nEILL, W., & BIEDERMAN, G. B. (1974). Avoidance conditioning as a function of appetitive stimulus pretraining: Response and stimulus transfer effects. Learning and Motivation, 5, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. OVERMIER, J. B., & PAYNE, R. J. (1971). Facilitation of instrumental avoidance learning by prior appetitive Pavlovian conditioning to the cue. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 31, 341–349.Google Scholar
  47. PANKSEPP, J., & KROST, K. (1975). Modification of diurnal feeding patterns by palatability. Physiology and Behavior, 15, 673–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. PHILIPPENS, K. M. H., MAYERSBACH, H. V., & SCHEVING, L E. (1977). Effects of the scheduling of meal-feeding at different phases of the circadian system in rats. Journal of Nutrition, 107, 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. RATNER, S. C. (1967). Comparative aspects of hypnosis. In J. E. Gordon (Ed.), Handbook of clinical and experimental hypnosis (pp. 550–587). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. RICHTER, C. P. (1965). Biological clocks in medicine and psychiatry. Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
  51. RICHTER, C. P. (1967). Sleep and activity: Their relation to the 24-hour clock. In S. Kety, E. Evarts, & H. Williams (Eds.), Sleep and altered States of consciousness (pp. 8–28). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  52. ROSENWASSER, A. M., BOULOS, Z., & TERMAN, M. (1981). Circadian organization of food intake and meal patterns in the rat. Physioiogy and Behavior, 27, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. ROVEE, K. C., KAUFMAN, L. W., & COLLIER, G. H. (1977). Components of predation defense behavior in chickens: Evidence for endogenous rhythmicity. Physioiogy and Behavior, 19, 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. SATINDER, K. P. (1976). Reactions of selectively bred strains of rats to a cat. Animal Learning and Behavior, 4, 172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. SCAVIO, M. J., Jr. (1974). Classical-classical transfer: Effects of prior aversive conditioning upon appetitive conditioning in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. SCAVIO, M. J., Jr., & GORMEZANO, I. (1980). Classical-classical transfer: Effects of prior appetitive conditioning upon aversive conditioning in rabbits. Animal Learning and Behavior, 8, 218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. SELIGMAN, M. E. P. (1970). On the generality of laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77, 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. SHETTLEWORTH, S. J. (1983). Function and mechanism in learning. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.), Advances in analysis of behavior: Vol. 3. Biological factors in learning (pp. 1–39). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. SIEGEL, P. S. (1961). Food intake in the rat in relation to the light-dark cycle. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 54, 294–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. SIGMUNDI, R. A., & BOLLES, R. C. (1983). CS modality, context conditioning, and freezing. Animal Learning and Behavior, 11, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. SIGMUNDI, R. A., BOUTON, M. E., & BOLLES, R. C. (1980). Conditioned freezing in the rat as a function of shock intensity and CS modality. Bulletin of the Psychonomie Society, 15, 254–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. SPITERI, N. J. (1982). Circadian patterning of feeding, drinking and activity during diurnal food access in rats. Physioiogy and Behavior, 28, 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. VAN WILLIGEN, F, EMMETT, J., COTE, D., & AYRES, J. J. B. (1987). CS modality effects in 1-trial backward & forward excitatory conditioning as assessed by conditioned suppression of licking in rats. Animal Learning & Behavior, 15, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. VILCHEZ, C. A., & ECHAVE LLANOS, J. M. (1971). Circadian rhythm in the feeding activity of Oxymycterus rutilans. Role played by light and food availability. Journal of Interdisciplinary Cycle Research, 2, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. WELKER, R. L., & WHEATLEY, K. L. (1977). Differential acquisition of conditioned suppression in rats with increased and decreased luminance levels as Cs+s. Learning and Motivation, 8, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. ZUCKER, I. (1971). Light-dark rhythms in rat eating and drinking behavior. Physioiogy and Behavior, 6, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurie S. Lester
    • 1
  • Michael S. Fanselow
    • 2
  1. 1.Development, and Engineering CenterU. S. Army Natick ResearchNatickUSA
  2. 2.University of California-Los AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations