The Psychological Record

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 87–115 | Cite as

The Cognition of Price

  • James Allison
  • Alison Buxton
Article

Abstract

Thirsty rats made 10, 30, or 90 licks at an empty spout for 10, 30, or 90 licks at a water spout. In the first experiment, three groups of six experienced a perfect positive, negative, or zero correlation between the number of empty licks required and the consequent number of water licks. The behavioral price of the water lick was the same for all three groups in terms of total empty licks/total water licks. But in terms of the arithmetic mean of the individual prices, the positive correlation imposed the lowest price, the negative correlation the highest. As the mean price increased the rats made fewer water licks, in accordance with the demand law, and licked more efficiently, getting more water per lick. In the second experiment, six rats chose between perfect positive and perfect negative correlational episodes. They showed at best only a slight preference for the positive, 55% on average, but started positive episodes much sooner than negative episodes. In the third experiment five rats chose between an imperfect positive and an imperfect negative correlation that represented a relatively small difference in terms of mean price. They chose each correlation 50% of the time on average, and they started positive episodes no sooner than negative ones. The overall pattern of results suggests that rats code price in terms of the arithmetic mean of the individual prices they have experienced and not in terms of the total cost relative to the total amount consumed over a particular interval of time.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ALLISON, J. (1977, May). Economics and operant conditioning. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  2. ALLISON, J. (1979). Demand economics and experimental psychology. Behavioral Science, 24, 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ALLISON, J. (1981). Paired baseline performance as a behavioral ideal. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 355–366.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. ALLISON, J. (1983). Behavioral economics. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  5. ALLISON, J., BUXTON, A., & MOORE, K. E. (1987). Rats’ responses to molar and local schedule constraints. Animal Learning and Behavior, 15, 360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ALLISON, J., & CASTELLAN, N. J., Jr. (1970). Temporal characteristics of nutritive drinking in rats and humans. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 70, 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ALLISON, J., MILLER, M., & WOZNY, M. (1979). Conservation in behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 4–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ANDERSON, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. BUXTON, A., & ALLISON, J. (1990). Efficiency and persistence of licking in rats. Physiology and Behavior, 47, 239–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. CROSSMAN, E. K. (1968). Pause relationships in multiple and chained fixed- ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 117–126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. FELTON, M., & LYON, D. O. (1966). The post-reinforcement pause. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 131–134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Flail.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. HERRNSTEIN, R. J., & LOVELAND, D. H. (1975). Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 107–116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. HOLLANDER, M., & WOLFE, D. A. (1973). Nonparametric statistical methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. HURSH, S. R. (1980). Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 219–238.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. LEA, S. E. G. (1978). Psychology and economics of demand. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. LEA, S. E. G., & ROPER, T. J. (1977). Demand for food in fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 27, 371–380.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. MINTZ, D. E., MOURER, D. J., & GOFSEYEFF, M. (1967). Sequential effects in fixed-ratio postreinforcement pause duration. Psychonomic Science, 9, 387–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MONROE, K. B., & PETROSHIUS, S. M. (1981). Buyers’ perceptions of price: An update of the evidence. In H. H. Kassarjian & T. S. Robertson (Eds.), Perspectives in consumer behavior (3rd ed., pp. 43–55). Glenview, Il: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
  20. POWELL, R. W. (1968). The effect of small sequential changes in fixed-ratio size upon the post-reinforcement pause. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 589–593.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. SHAPIRO, N., & ALLISON, J. (1978). Conservation, choice, and the concurrent fixed-ratio schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 211–223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. THALER, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. WINER, B. J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Allison
    • 1
  • Alison Buxton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations