Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 41–49 | Cite as

Rule-Governed Behavior: A Radical Behavioral Answer To the Cognitive Challenge

  • Robert D. Zettle
Article

Abstract

A radical behavioral interpretation of the role thinking may play in controlling other human behavior is presented, using rulegoverned behavior as a key explanatory concept. An overview of rule-governed behavior is provided with emphasis on the formulation and following of self-rules. Opposing world views endorsed by radical behaviorism and cognitive psychology are discussed in contrasting the explanations each offers for cognitive phenomena. Differing philosophical foundations and associated truth criteria are viewed as precluding any direct comparison of the adequacy of behavior analytic and cognitive interpretations of cognitive control and related phenomena.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. (1988). Thesaurus of psychological index terms (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. BANDURA, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BANDURA, A. (1977b). Social learning theory New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  4. BARON, A., & GALIZIO, M. (1983). Instructional control of human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 33, 495–520.Google Scholar
  5. BENTALL, R. P., LOWE, C. F., & BEASTY, A. (1985). The role of verbal behavior in human learning: II. Developmental differences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C., & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. FERSTER, C. B. (1972a). An experimental analysis of clinical phenomena. The Psychological Record, 22, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. FERSTER, C. B. (1972b). Psychotherapy from the standpoint of a behaviorist. In J. D. Keehn (Ed.), Psychopathology in animals: Research and clinical implications (pp. 279–303). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. GLENN, S. S. (1987). Rules as environmental events. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. HAYES, S. C. (1987). A contextual approach to therapeutic change. In N. S. Jacobson (Ed.), Psychotherapists in clinical practice: Cognitive and behavioral perspectives (pp. 327–387). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. HAYES, S. C. (Ed.). (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  12. HAYES, S. C., & BROWNSTEIN, A. J. (1985, May). Verbal behavior, equivalence classes, and rules: New definitions, data, and directions. Invited address presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Columbus, Oh.Google Scholar
  13. HAYES, S. C., & BROWNSTEIN, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. HAYES, S. C., BROWNSTEIN, A. J., ZETTLE, R. D., ROSENFARB, I., & KORN, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. HULSE, S. H., FOWLER, H., & HONIG, W. K. (Eds.). (1978). Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. MAHONEY, M. J. (1974). Cognition and behavior modification. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  18. MATTHEWS, B. A., CATANIA, A.., & SHIMOFF, E. (1985). Effects of uninstructed verbal behavior on nonverbal responding: Contingency descriptions versus performance descriptions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MILLER, L. (1988). Behaviorism and the new science of cognition. The Psychological Record, 38, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. PEPPER, S. C. (1961). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. RISLEY, T R., & HART, B. (1968). Developing correspondence between the non-verbal and verbal behavior of preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ROGERS-WARREN, A., & BAER, D. M. (1976). Correspondence between saying and doing: Teaching children to share and praise. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. SKINNER, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem-solving: Research, method, and theory (pp. 225–257). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. SKINNER, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. ZETTLE, R. D. (1980, November). Insight: Rules and revelations. In S. C. Hayes (Chair), The baby and the bathwater: Radical behavioral interpretations of traditional clinical phenomena. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New York.Google Scholar
  28. ZETTLE, R. D., & HAYES, S. C. (1982). Rule-governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive-behavioral therapy. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 73–118). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ZETTLE, R. D., & HAYES, S. C. (1984, August). Cognitive therapy of depression: A behavioral analysis of component and process issues. In S. C. Hayes (Chair), Behavior analytic perspectives on current issues in clinical psychology. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
  30. ZETTLE, R. D., & HAYES, S. C. (1986). Dysfunctional control by client verbal behavior: the context of reason-giving. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 4, 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ZETTLE, R. D., & RAINS, J. C. (1989). Group cognitive and contextual therapies in treatment of depression. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ZETTLE, R. D., & YOUNG, M. J. (1987). Rule-following and human operant responding: Conceptual and methodological considerations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert D. Zettle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWichita State UniversityWichitaUSA

Personalised recommendations