Skip to main content
Log in

Quality metrics for information systems

  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work discussed here attempts to identify the practical quality metrics for Information Systems. It explores how the quality metrics are evaluated to analyse the performance of Information Systems. The experimental analysis is validated by means of user satisfaction survey. First, the key quality characteristics are determined from the ISO model of the system and / or from the results of a user survey. These metrics are then computed and the values are compared with the results from a user satisfaction survey. Correlation analysis for the rankings from the experiment of quality metrics and the user satisfaction survey is carried out. Based on the values of the quality metrics, the quality characteristics are ranked. Several hypotheses are tested to check the correlation between the ranking of specific quality metrics and ranking of specific quality characteristics and ranking of overall user satisfaction. The functional requirements of the systems to achieve the quality characteristics are then identified and their strengths of association with the key quality characteristics are determined using quality houses of Quality Function Deployment. Using QFD, the system is redesigned to achieve higher performance in terms of higher values of the quality metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adrian Burr, Mai Owen (1996), Statistical Methods for Software Quality: Using Metrics for Process Improvement, International Thomson Computer Press.

  2. Ashok S.R., Venkatesha. C.S & Achyutha B.T., Proceedings of the International conference on Operations Research and Development (ICORD) 2002, India.

  3. Dale L Goodhue, User evaluations of Information Systems as surrogates for objective performance, Information & Management, Vol 38, Issue 2, Dec 2000, 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dennis P Slevin, Critical success factor analysis for information systems performance measurement and enhancement, Information & Management, Vol 21, Issue 3, October 1991, 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fatemeh Zahedi, (1995) Quality Information Systems, Boyd & Fraser publishing company.

  6. Hareton K.N. Leung, Quality Metrics for internet applications, Information & Management, Vol 38, Issue 3, January 2001, 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jo Bryson, Managing Information Services- An integration approach, Gower publications.

  8. Michael E Lesk, Performance of automatic information systems, Information Storage and Retrieval, Vol 4, Issue 2, June 1968, 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stephen H Kan (1995), Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering, Addison Wesley Publishing Company.

  10. Taylor R S (1986), Value added process in Information Systems, Norwood publishing co.

  11. Tim Lincoln (1990), Managing Information Systems for profit, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

  12. Yang W Lee, AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment, Information & Management, Vol 40, Issue 2, December 2002, 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duraivelu, K. Quality metrics for information systems. OPSEARCH 41, 200–207 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398845

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398845

Key words

Navigation