Skip to main content
Log in

Truncated Non-homogeneous Poisson Process Models — Properties and Performance

  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

All non-homogeneous Poisson process (NHPP) software reliability growth models of the finite failures category share the property that every time to failure distribution is defective. The reason for this phenomenon is the fact that according to these models it is always possible that no fault is left in the software. Excluding this possibility leads to a class of infinite failures category NHPP models which we call truncated NHPP models. In this paper, we derive the truncated models connected with three well-known finite failures NHPP models and discuss some of their properties. We then compare the performance of these new models with that of their counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdel-Ghaly, A.A., Chan, P.Y. and Littlewood, B. (1986). Evaluation of competing software reliability predictions, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 12, 950–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akaike, H. (1992). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle, In: Kotz, S. and Johnson, N.L. (ed). Breakthroughs in Statistics — Volume I. Springer, New York, 611–624. (Reprint of the original 1973 paper).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brocklehurst, S. and Littlewood, B. (1996). Techniques for prediction analysis and recalibration, In: Lyu, M.R. (ed), Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering. New York, 119–166.

  4. Data & Analysis Center for Software. The software reliability dataset. Available at http://www.dacs.dtic.mil/databases/sled/swrel.shtml. (Link verified on August 3, 2005).

  5. Goel, A.L. (1985). Software Reliability Models: Assumptions, Limitations and Applicability, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 11, 1411–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goel, A.L. and Okumoto, K. (1979). Time-dependent error-detection model for software reliability and other performance measures, IEEE Transactions on Reliability 28, 206–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grottke, M. and Trivedi, K.S. (2005). On a method for mending time to failure distributions, In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, Los Alamitos, 560–569.

  8. Lyu, M.R. and Nikora, A. (1991). A heuristic approach for software reliability prediction: The equally-weighted linear combination model, In: Proceedings of the 1991 International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, Los Alamitos, 172–181.

  9. Musa, J.D., Iannino, A., and Okumoto, K. (1987). Software Reliability — Measurement, Prediction, Application. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ohba, M. (1984). Software reliability analysis models, IBM Journal of Research and Development 28, 428–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trivedi, K.S. (2001). Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queuing and Computer Science Applications. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yamada, S., Ohba, M., and Osaki, S. (1983). S-shaped reliability growth modeling for software error detection, IEEE Transactions on Reliability 32, 475–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by a fellowship within the Postdoc Program of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grottke, M., Trivedi, K.S. Truncated Non-homogeneous Poisson Process Models — Properties and Performance. OPSEARCH 42, 310–321 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398742

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398742

Key words

Navigation