Skip to main content
Log in

A Bi-Level Non-Linear Multi-Objective Decision Making under Fuzziness

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies a bi-level non-linear multi-objective decision making (BLN — MODM) problem with linear (or nonlinear) constraints, and in which the objective function at each levels are nonlinear functions, which are to be maximized. The BLN-MODM problem can be thought of as a static version of the Stackelberg leader-follower game in which a Stackelberg strategy is used by the leader (or the higher — level decision maker (HLDM)), given the rational reaction of the follower (or the lower-level decision maker (LLDM)). From this point of view, this paper proposes a two-planner bi-level multi-objective decision-making model and solution method for solving this problem. This method uses the concepts of tolerance membership function and multi-objective optimization (MOO) (at each level) to develop a fuzzy max — min decision model for generating Pareto optimal (satisfactory) solution for BLN — MODM problem. The HLDM specifies his/her objective functions and decisions with possible tolerances, which are described by membership functions of fuzzy set theory. Then, the LLDM uses this preference information for HLDM and solves his/her problem subject to the HLDMs’ restrictions. An illustrative numerical example is given to demonstrate the obtained results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anandalingam G “A mathematical programming model of decentralized multilevel system.” Journal of Operational Research Society 39 (1988) 1021–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bard J F “An efficient point algorithm for a linear two-stage optimization problem.” Operations Research 31 (1983) 670–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bard J F “Optimality conditions for the bilevel programming problem.”, Naval Research logistics Quarterly 31 (1984) 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellman R and Zadeh L A “Decision making in a fuzzy environment.”, Management Science 17 (1970) B141–B164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bialas W F and Karwan, M. H “On two-level optimization.”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 27 (1982) 211–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bialas W F and Karwan M H “Two-level linear programming.”, Management Science 30 (1984) 1004–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Candler W and Townsly R “A linear two-level programming problem.”, Computers and Operations Research 9 (1982) 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cruz J B “Leader-follower strategies for multilevel systems.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC23 (1978) 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dauer J P and Osman MSA “Decomposition of the parametric space in multiobjective convex programs using the generalized Tchebycheff norm”, Journal of mathematical Analysis and Applications 107/1 (1985) 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hus-Shih Shih, Lai Y.-J. and Stanley Lee E “Fuzzy approach for multilevel programming problems”, Computers and Operations Research 23/1 (1996) 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lai Y-J, Liu T Y and Hwang C L “TOPSIS for MODM.”, European Journal of Operational Research 76 (1994) 486–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lai Y-J “IMOST: Interactive multiple objective system technique”, Journal of Operational Research Society 46 (1995) 958–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi X and Xia H “Interactive bilevel multi-objective decision making”, Journal of Operational Research Society 48 (1997) 943–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Simann M and Cruz J B “On the Stackelberg strategy in nonzero sum games”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 11 (1973) 533–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ünlü G “A linear bilevel programming algorithm based on bicriteria programming”, Computers and Operations Research 14 (1987) 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wen, U P and Bialas W F “The hybrid algorithm for solving the three — level linear programming problem”, Computers and Operations Research 13 (1986) 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wen U P and Hus S T “Linear bi-level programming problems-A review” Journal of Operational Research Society 42 (1991) 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zimmermann H J Fuzzy sets, Decision Making, and Expert systems, Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abo-Sinna, M.A. A Bi-Level Non-Linear Multi-Objective Decision Making under Fuzziness. OPSEARCH 38, 484–495 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398652

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398652

Key words

Navigation