Abstract
This paper deals with the simulation of the implications for the economy of Colombia of the Kyoto Protocol on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The Protocol proposes three flexibility instruments for reaching at a lower global cost the reduction targets: the Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Implementation that would permit developing and developed countries to co-operate on a project by project basis, as well as the International Emissions Trading among developed countries. An important question is to identify precisely the benefits accruing to both parties in such agreements or trade schemes. Taking, as an hypothetical example, a co-operation between Switzerland and Colombia, and using a family of techno-economic models related to MARKAL, one presents a set of simulations of the response of the energy system of Colombia to abatement measures proposed in the Kyoto Protocol. The paper shows the necessity to go through this type of modelling approach if the policies recommended in the Kyoto protocol have to be successfully implemented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABARE. “The Kyoto Protocol and Developing Countries: Impacts and Implications for Mechanism Design”. June (2000).
Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales-ACCEF-. “Preliminary Results of Greenhouse Gas Inventory Source, Sinks and Reservoirs Project”. Bogota (1996)
Bahn O, Cadena A, Kypreos S. “Joint Implementation of CO2 emission reduction measures between Switzerland and Colombia” International Journal of Environment and Pollution, Vol. 12, Nos. 2/3. (1999).
Barreto L and Kypreos S. “Technological Learning in Energy Models: Experience and Scenario Analysis with MARKAL and ERIS Model Prototype”. PSI Beritch 99-08, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland (1999).
Berger C, Dubois R, Haurie A, Lessard E, Loulou R, Waaub J.-P. “Canadian MARKAL: An advanced Linear Programming System for Energy and Environmental Modelling”. Les Cahiers du GERAD, G-90-53, Montreal (1991).
Berger C, Loulou R. “Extended MARKAL: A Brief User Manual”. Les Cahiers du GERAD, Montreal (1993).
Bueler B and Kypreos S. “A Multiregional MARKAL-MACRO Model to Study an International Market of CO2 Emission Permits”. PSI Beritch No. 97-09, Switzerland (1997).
Cadena A, Navas F, Ramírez R, Rojas C. “Desarrollo e implementación de herramientas de modelización para gestión energética en Colombia-EI Proyecto MARKAL Colombia”. Revista Energética, Vol. 11, Medellín, Colombia (1994).
Cadena A. “Models to assess the implication of the Kyoto Protocol on the energy system and economy of Colombia”. Thesis, HEC, University of Geneva (2000).
Carlson D and Haurie A. “A Turnpike Theory for Infinite-Horizon Open-Loop Competitive Processes”. SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization, Vol. 34, No. 4, July. (1996).
Ecopetrol. “Programa de Operación de la Refineria de Barrancabermeja, 1994-2008”. Process Industry Modelling System, Version 5.00. (1993).
Ellerman A, Jacoby H and Decaux A. “The Effects on Developing Countries of the Kyoto Protocol and CO2 Emissions Trading”, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 36, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1998).
ETSAP-GERAD. “Modelling the Oil Refineries in GAMS-MARKAL”. May (1997).
Fishbone L.G. and Abilock H. “MARKAL, a linear-programming model for energy systems analysis: technical description of the BNL version” International Journal of Energy Research. (1981).
Fragnieri E and Haurie A. “A Stochastic Programming Model for Energy/Environment Choices under Uncertainty”. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, Vol. 6, No. 4-6 (1997).
Grubb M with Vrolijk C and Brack D. “The Kyoto Protocol, A Guide and Assessment”. The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Earthscan (1999).
Gruebler A. “Technology and Global Change”. Cambridge University Press (1998).
Hamilton L, Goldstein G, Lee J, Manne A, Marcuse W, Morris S and Wene C.-O. “MARKAL-MACRO: An Overview”, Brookhaven National Laboratory, BNL-48377 (1992).
Haurie A, Loulou R. “Modeling Equilibria and Risk under Global Environmental Constraints in Energy Models. Les Cahiers du GERAD, G-93-08. Montreal (1993).
Haurie A. “Environmental Coordination in Dynamic Oligopolistic Markets”. Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 4 (1995).
Haurie A and Zaccour G. “Differential Game Models of Global Environmental Management”. In: Carraro C and Filar J (ed). Control and Game-Theoretic Models of the Environment, Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games (1995).
Kram T. “National Energy Options for Reducing CO2 Emissions, Vol. 1: The International Connection”. Report of ETSAP/Annex IV, ECN (1993).
Kypreos S. “The MARKAL-MACRO Model and the Climate Change”. PSI Bericht No. 96-14. Switzerland (1996).
Kypreos S and Cadena A. “Partial and General Equilibrium Versions of Markal Models with Multi-Regional Trade: Model Specifications and Applications”. Join IEA-ALEP/IEA-ETSAP Annex VI, 6th Workshop, Antalya Turkey, October (1998).
Kypreos S and Barreto L. “Experience Curves in MARKAL and Links to Macroeconomic Models”. Workshop on Modeling Technological Learning, NASA, Laxenburg, March (1998).
Loulou R and Lavigne D. “MARKAL Model with Elastic Demand: Application to Greenhouse Gas Emission Control”. In: Carraro C and Haurie A (ed). Operation Research and Environmental Management, Kluwer Academic Publisher, (1996).
Loulou R, Shukla RR, and Kanudia A. “Energy and Environment Policies for a Sustainable Future: Issues, Models and Analysis for India”. Allied Publishers, New Delhi, India (1997).
MacDonald A. “Climate Change and World Energy”. NASA Interim Report, IR-00-006, February (2000).
Mesa O, Poveda G, Carvajal L, Salazar J. “Reservoir Reliability Design Under Interannual Climatic and Hydrological Variability”. Managing Water: Coping with Scarcity and Abundance, ASCE (1997).
Ministerio de Minas y Energia. “Estudio de la demanda de energia en el sector transporte”, Bogota, (1987).
Ministerio de Transporte, Organización de Estados Americanos, “Estudio del sector Transporte en Colombia”. Informe Final, Bogota (1982).
Nakicenovic N. “Technological Change as a Learning Process”. NASA Induced Technology Workshop, NASA, June (1997).
Unidad de Planeación Minerò Energética. “Estudio de la Demanda de Energia en Colombia 1994-2010”, Bogota (1994).
Unidad de Planeación Minerò Energética. “Estadisticas Minero-Energéticas de Colombia 1972–1995”. Bogota (1996).
Unidad de Planeación Minerò Energética, Instituto de Economía Energética. “Estudio de la demanda de gas natural en Colombia”. Bogota (1998).
Unidad de Planeación Minerò Energética. “Modelos de Demanda de Energia Electrica para Colombia”. Bogota (1998).
Unidad de Planeación Minerò Energética. “La cadena de gas natural en Colombia”. Bogota (1998).
Ministerio del Medio Ambiente. “Estrategia Nacional para el Mecanismo de Desarrollo Limpio”, Documento Final Preliminar. Oficina de Asuntos Económicos, Bogota (2000).
United Nations. “Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”. Conference of the Parties, FCCC/CP/1997/L7/Add.1 (1997).
World Coal Institute. “Coal - Power for the Progress”. Fourth Edition, Home Page (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cadena, A., Haurie, A. Modelling the Implications of the Kyoto Protocol for a Developing Country. OPSEARCH 38, 44–66 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398629
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398629