Skip to main content
Log in

The Optimization of an Organizational Restructuring Problem

  • Theoretical Papers
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An organization’s structure significantly affects its performance. Because of the dynamic nature of the environment, an organization must be reconstructed with time. Based on the multi-criteria of the organization, this study develops mathematical models for the optimization of an organizational restructuring problem (ORP). A list of directed relations among units in an organization is assumed to exist. Given the definitions of hierarchical, combined and associated relations, a list of properties of an ORP is explored. In addition, we propose four algorithms designed to solve alternative ORPs. Finally, two numerical examples are employed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BARNATT, C., 1995. “Office Space And Virtual organization,” Journal of General Management, Vol. 20, No. 4, p. 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. BARNEY J. B., 1990. “The Debate Between Traditional management Theory And Organizational Economics: Substantive Differences or Intergroup Conflict,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, p. 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. GRINYER Rh. AND Ya. MASOUND, 1981. “Strategy, Structure, Size And Bureaucracyl,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3, p. 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. COLIN, R.C., 1993. “The Power of Information,” Personnel Management, Vol. 25, No. 9, p. 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D’AUNNO, T, SUTTON, R.I., AND R.H. PRICE, 1991. “Isomorphism And External Support in Conflicting Institutional Environments: A Study of Drug Abuse Treatment Units,’ Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 3, p. 636–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DEMING, W.E., 1993. The New Economics, Mit, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, Ma.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DONALDSON, L, 1990. “The Ethereal hand: Organizational Economics And Management Theory,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, p. 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  8. FRED, M.L. AND L.O. DAVID, 1982. “A Management Science Approach to Contingency Models of Organizational Structure,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 3, p. 533–566.

    Google Scholar 

  9. FINKELSTEIN, S., 1992. “Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, And Validation,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, No. 3, p. 505–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. FRY L.W., 1982. Technology-Structure Research: Three Critical Issuesl,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 3, p. 532–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. GRANDORI, A., 1991. ‘Negotiating Efficient Organization Forms,’ Journal of Economic Behavior And Organization, Vol. 16, No.3, p. 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. HESTERLY W.S., LIERBESKIND, J., AND Tr. ZENGER, 1982. “Organizational Economics: An Impending Revolution in organization Theory?” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, No.3, p. 402–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. HO, Y, 1994. “The Relation of Task Environment, Organizational Structure And Organizational Effectiveness,’ Sun Yat-sen Management Review (Taiwan), Vol. 2, No. 4, 21–54.

    Google Scholar 

  14. MINTZBERG, M., 1980. “Structure in 5’s. A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design,” Management Science, p. 336–380.

    Google Scholar 

  15. MOE, T.M., 1984. “The New economics of organization,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 28, p. 739–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’REILLY C. A., CHATMAN, J., AND D.F. CALDWELL, 1991. “People And Organization Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 3, p. 487–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. PETROZZO, D.R, 1995. “Restructuring the Purpose of It in an Organization,” National Productivity Review/summer, p. 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  18. RANDOLPH, W.A., 1991. “Technology-Structure Fit And Performance in Small Business: An Examination of the Moderating Effects of organizational States,” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 16, No. 1. p. 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ROBLES, F. AND R. RADOSEVICH, 1984. “Needs Assessment for Support Units in an R & D Organization,” Ieee Transaction on Engineering management, Vol. 31, No. 2. p. 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. SEDGEWICK, R., 1989. Algorithms, Addison-Wesly, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  21. SMELTZER, L.R. AND M.F. ZENER, 1995. “Organization-Wide Change Planning for an Effective Announcement,” Journal of General Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, p. 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. STALK, G.J. AND J.E. BLACK, 1994. “The Myth of the Horizontal Organization,” Canadian Bussiness Review, Vol. 21, No. 4, p. 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  23. ZEFFANE, R.M., 1989. “Centralization or Formalization? Indifference Curves for Stragies of Control,” Organization Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3, p. 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, CT., Tong, LI. & Chang, CC. The Optimization of an Organizational Restructuring Problem. OPSEARCH 35, 295–322 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398551

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398551

Navigation