Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Modern Burdens on Blast Furnace Design

  • 24th Ironmaking Conference
  • ... From the Ironmaking Conference
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

During the past century, advances in blast furnace design have been greatly infiuenced by improved burdens and increased demands for hot metal. This has resulted in increased hot blast temperatures and better material preparation, accompanied by increased iron rates and decreased coke rates.

However, with the trend towards fewer but larger furnaces, it is essential to consider all possible methods for lengthening furnace campaigns and for minimizing capital and operating costs.

Experience in the design of blast furnaces, combined with a thorough study of current operating practices, leads to the following conclusions:

1. Longer blast furnace campaigns and maximum benefits from the use of modern burdens are possible by means of better refractories, more effective cooling, and careful attention to details of design and supervision of construction.

2. For a given ironmaking requirement, it costs less to build and operate ablast furnace designed for about 12 psi top pressure and operated at about 6 psi, than one designed for substantially higher or lower top pressure.

3) The greatest savings in blast furnace labor costs may be found in the cast house where the majority of manual labor is concentrated. The four-post furnace design permits maximum use of mechanized equipment to help realize these savings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. R. Haley: Pellets Preferred, Blast Furnace and Steel Plant, May 1965, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 393–397.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu. A. Popov and V. I. Markin: Wear of Blast-Furnace Carbon Hearth Pads, Stal (in English), Nov. 1959, pp. 811–813.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. L. Brady, J. L. Pugh and R. W. Adams: Amanda and Bellefonte... Answers to Iron-making, Journal of Metals, Aug. 1964, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 637–643.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. E. Slagley and C. M. Squarcy: Peripheral Cooling of a Blast Furnace, Blast Furnace and Steel Plant, April 1965, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. J. Greaves: Application of Combustion Equipment to Blast Furnace Stoves, Iron and Steel Engineer, July 1963, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. J. Greaves: Belts vs. Skips for Filling a 4000-Ton Blast Furnace, Blast Furnace and Steel Plant, Aug. 1964, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 685–691.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. J. Greaves: Engineering a Cast House for a 4000-Ton Blast Furnace, AIME Iron-making Proceedings, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greaves, M.J. The Effect of Modern Burdens on Blast Furnace Design. JOM 18, 378–384 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397507

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397507

Navigation