Abstract
The transformation characteristics are found to resemble a similar binary alloy. The differences are due to the alpha iron particles. While strength properties of the isothermally transformed alloys are high, ductility is low, resulting in high notch sensitivity. The elastic modulus can be varied widely and correlates with strength. Abnormal grain growth sometimes occurs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. S. Davenport and E. C. Bain: Trans. AIME (1930) 90, p. 117.
C. S. Smith and W. E. Lindlief: Trans. AIME (1933) 104, p. 69.
D. J. Mack: Trans. AIME (1948) 175, p. 240; Metals Technology (September 1947).
D. J. Mack: Trans. AIME (1950) 188, p. 1066; Journal of Metals (August 1950).
E. P. Klier and S. M. Grymko: Trans. AIME (1950) 185, p. 611; Journal of Metals (September 1949).
D. J. Mack: Trans. AIME (1946) 166, p. 68; Metals Technology (December 1945).
R. L. Ludwig: Unpublished Thesis, University of Wisconsin (1948).
Metals Handbook. ASM (1948) p. 1146.
G. K. Dreher: Metal Progress (1940) 38, No. 6, p. 791.
A. Hultgren: Trans. ASM (1947) 39, p. 973.
E. S. Davenport, R. A. Grange, and R. J. Hafsten: Trans. AIME (1941) 145, p. 310.
Ampco Metal, Inc. — Alloys, Products and Uses in Modern Industry. Ampco Metal, Inc. Milwaukee, Wise.
J. Strauss: Trans. Amer. Soc. Steel Treaters (1927) 12, p. 105.
A. Yutaka: Nippon Kinzoku-Gakkai-Si (1941) 5, (4), p. 136. In Japanese with tables and diagrams in English.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Discussion on this paper, TP 3147E, may be sent, 2 copies, to AIME by Dec. 1, 1951. Manuscript, Jan. 15, 1951. Detroit Meeting, October 1951.
This paper represents part of a thesis by A. H. Kasberg, Jr. submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science, Metallurgical Engineering, to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Wisconsin.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kasberg, A.H., Mack, D.J. Isothermal Transformation and Properties of a Commercial Aluminum Bronze. JOM 3, 903–908 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397399
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397399