Skip to main content
Log in

Heterologie

Konturen frühneuzeitlichen Selbstseins jenseits von Autonomie und Heteronomie

Heterology. Early modern contours of the self beyond autonomy and heteronomy

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early modern subjectivity has been analysed under the competing rubrics of (a) autonomy and the emancipation of the individual (Burckhardt, Dilthey) as well as (b) heteronomy and self-fashioning within the limits of contextuality and discursive economy (e.g. Greenblatt). In view of the reductionist tendencies of both these models, a change of perspective is suggested. The concept of >heterology< offers an alternative mode of dealing with certain aspects of subjectivity which the familiar paradigms systematically neglect. Heterology focusses on the ways the self relates to alterity — with emphases varying from otherness in a weak sense to radical transcendence —, insisting that it cannot in fact be understood outside this relationship. In combination with the rhetoric of copia, heterology provides an analytic orientation which permits not only rereadings of central texts by Montaigne and Descartes, but above all shows the achievement of literature as a medium for the constitution of early modern subjectivity. An interpretation of George Herbert’s The Collar finally demonstrates the superior possibilities of poetic language in mapping out the problem of the self beyond the current clichés.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Jakob Burckhardt: Die Kultur der Renaissance in Italien. Horst Günther (Hg.), Frankfurt a. M. 1989 (= Bibliothek Deutscher Klassiker 38), S. 137.

  2. Zur Terminologie vgl. Walter Schulz: Ich und Welt. Philosophie der Subjektivität, Pfullingen 1979, und ders.: Metaphysik des Schwebens. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Ästhetik, Pfullingen 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Terence Cave: The Cornucopian Text. Problems of Writing in the French Renaissance, Oxford 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hugo Friedrich: Montaigne (1949), Tübingen/Basel 3. Aufl. 1993, S. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vgl. hierzu auch John Cottingham: Descartes, Oxford 1986, sowie Paul Ricoeur: Oneself as Another. (Übs. Kathleen Blarney) Chicago/London 1992, bes. »The Question of Selfhood«, S. 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. René Descartes: Discours de la Méthode/Von der Methode des richtigen Vernunftgebrauchs und der wissenschaftlichen Forschung. (Übs. und Hg. Lüder Gäbe) Hamburg 1960, S. 53 (IV, 1); vgl. auch ebd., S. 55 (IV, 3), sowie René Descartes: La recherche de la vérité par la lumière naturelle (Übs. und Hg. Gerhart Schmidt) Würzburg 1989, S. 76-77.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vgl. zu diesem Effekt Emmanuel Levinas: »Gott und die Philosophie« in: Bernhard Casper (Hg.): Gott nennen. Phänomenologische Zugänge, Freiburg (Br.)/München 1981, sowie Verf.: Subjektivität als Dialog (wie Anm. 13), S. 362-373.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. E. Hutchinson (Hg.): The Works of George Herbert, Oxford (1941) 1978, S. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert Burton: The Anatomy of Melancholy (1621). Holbrook Jackson (Hg.), London/Toronto 1972.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olejniczak, V. Heterologie. Z Literaturwiss Linguistik 26, 6–36 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396149

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396149

Navigation