Skip to main content
Log in

Retention of Esperanto is Affected by Delay-Interval Task and Item Closure: A Partial Resolution of the Delay-Retention Effect

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present studies were undertaken to examine the effects of manipulating delay-interval task (Study 1) and timing of feedback (Study 2) on acquisition and retention. Participants completed a 100-item cumulative final examination, which included 50 items from each laboratory examination, plus 50 entirely new items. Acquisition and retention were examined in Study 1 in which delayinterval task, length of delay until feedback was delivered, and the opportunity to answer until correct (AUG) were manipulated and, in Study 2, in which the number of items completed before feedback was delivered and AUC were manipulated. Delays longer than 5 s negatively affected learning (Study 1) when participants engaged in a delay-interval distraction task; enhancement was observed when individual test items and correct responses were reviewed during the interval. Significant decrements in learning were observed in Study 2 in the absence of a distraction task when more than 1 test item was completed prior to the delivery of feedback. The present outcomes add to the growing body of evidence that retention is maximized when test items are completed individually and exited with knowledge of the correct response, that the opportunity to answer until correct minimizes perseverative inaccurate responding and, for multiple-choice test items, that immediate feedback is a more effective facilitator of retention than delayed feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BEESON, R. O. (1973). Immediate knowledge of results and test performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 66, 224–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRACKBILL, Y., ADAMS, G., & REANEY, T. P. (1967). A parametric study of the delay-retention effect. Psychological Reports, 20, 433–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BRACKBILL, Y., BRAVOS, A., & STARR, R. H. (1962). Delay-improved retention of a difficult task. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 947–952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BROSVIC, G. M., EPSTEIN, M. L., DIHOFF, R. E., & COOK, M. J. (2005). Efficacy of error for the correction of initially incorrect assumptions and of feedback for the affirmation of correct responding: Learning in the classroom. The Psychological Record, 55, 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROSVIC, G. M., EPSTEIN, M. L., DIHOFF, R. E., & COOK, M. J. (2006a). Feedback facilitates the acquisition and retention of numerical fact series by elementary school students with mathematics learning disabilities. The Psychological Record, 56, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROSVIC, G. M., EPSTEIN, M. L., DIHOFF, R. E., & COOK, M. J. (2006b). Acquisition and retention of Esperanto: The case for error correction and immediate feedback. The Psychological Record, 56, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIHOFF, R. E., BROSVIC, G. M., & EPSTEIN, M. L. (2003). The role of feedback during academic testing: The delay-retention effect revisited. The Psychological Record, 53, 533–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIHOFF, R. E., BROSVIC, G. M., EPSTEIN, M. L. & COOK, M. J. (2004). Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. The Psychological Record, 54, 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIHOFF, R. E., BROSVIC, G. M., EPSTEIN, M. L., & COOK, M. J. (2005). Adjunctive role for immediate feedback in the acquisition and retention of mathematical fact series by elementary school students classified with mild mental retardation. The Psychological Record, 55, 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, M. L., BROSVIC, G. M., DIHOFF, R. E., LAZARUS, A. D., & COSTNER, K. L. (2003). Effectiveness of feedback during the testing of preschool children, elementary school children, and adolescents with developmental delays. The Psychological Record, 53, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, M. L., LAZARUS, A. D., CALVANO, T. B., MATTHEWS, K. A., HENDEL, R. A., EPSTEIN, B. B., & BROSVIC, G. M. (2002). Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. The Psychological Record, 52, 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KULHAVY, R. W., & ANDERSON, R. C. (1972). Delay-retention effects with multiple choice tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 505–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RANKIN, R. J., & TEPPER, T. (1978). Retention and delay of feedback in a computerassisted instructional task. Journal of Experimental Education, 46, 67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SWINNEN, S. P., SCHMIDT, R. A., NICHOLSON, D. E., & SHAPIRO, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 706–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • SURBER, J. R., & ANDERSON, A. C. (1975). Delay-retention effect in natural classroom settings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 170–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WELLS, J. C. (1992). Concise Esperanto and English dictionary. New York: McGraw-Hili.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary M. Brosvic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brosvic, G.M., Epstein, M.L., Dihoff, R.E. et al. Retention of Esperanto is Affected by Delay-Interval Task and Item Closure: A Partial Resolution of the Delay-Retention Effect. Psychol Rec 56, 597–615 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396036

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396036

Navigation