Abstract
This paper proposes a new analysis of generative performances derived from contingencies that establish the production of stimulus sequences. Neither simple chaining nor within-sequence conditional stimulus control can account for the production of novel, untrained sequences that have been the outcomes of a number of experiments. The alternative analysis we propose focuses on relations among stimuli within sequences and across sequences trained independently of one another, and behavioral tests that evaluate whether such relations possess the properties of an order relation (i.e., asymmetry, transitivity, and connectedness). Our approach is an extension of Sidman’s analysis of relations among stimuli in equivalence classes. It provides a framework for examining how equivalence and order relations interact to yield extensive repertoires of novel behaviors that occur under appropriate circumstances. The concepts and procedures we present outline a behavior analytic approach to studying aspects of phenomena like syntactic development and transitive inference.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ADAMS, B. J., FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1993: this issue). Formation of generalized equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 43, 553–566.
BAROODY, A. J. (1988). Number-comparison learning by children classified as mentally retarded. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 92, 461–471.
BRAINERD, C. J. (1973). The origins of number concepts. Scientific American, 228, 101–109.
BRAINERD, C. J. (1974). Inducing ordinal and cardinal representations of the first five natural numbers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 520–534.
BRESLOW, L. (1981). Réévaluation of the literature on the development of transitive inferences. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 325–351.
BRYANT, P. E., & TRABASSO, T. (1971). Transitive inference and memory in young children. Nature, 232, 456–458.
BUSH, K. M., SIDMAN, M., & DE ROSE, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29–45.
CARTER, D. E., & WERNER, T. J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 565–601.
CHALMERS, M., & MCGONIGLE, B. (1984). Are children any more logical than monkeys on the five-term series problem? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 355–377.
CUMMING, W. W., & BERRYMAN, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: Studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 284–330). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
D’AMATO, M. R., & COLOMBO, M. (1988). Representation of serial order in monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 131–139.
DE ROSE, J. C., MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., & STODDARD, L. T. (1988). Stimulus class formation and functional equivalence in moderately retarded individuals conditional discrimination’. Behavioural Processes, 17, 167–175.
DUBE, W. V. (1991). Computer software for stimulus control research with Macintosh computers. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 9, 28–30.
DUBE, W. V., & MCILVANE, W. J. (1989). Adapting a microcomputer for behavioral evaluation of mentally retarded individuals. In J. A. Mulick & R. F. Antonak (Eds.), Transitions in mental retardation: Vol. 4. Applications and implications of technology (pp. 104–127). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
GILLAN, D. J. (1981). Reasoning in the chimpanzee: II. Transitive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 150–164.
GREEN, G., SIGURDARDOTTIR, Z. G., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1991). The role of instructions in the transfer of ordinal functions through equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 287–304.
HALFORD, G. S. (1984). Can young children integrate premises in transitivity and serial order tasks? Cognitive Psychology, 16, 65–93.
JENKINS, J. J., & PALERMO, D. S. (1964). Mediation processes and the acquisition of linguistic structure. In U. Bellugi & R. W. Brown (Eds.), The acquisition of language. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 29, 141–169.
KALLIO, K. D. (1982). Developmental change on a five-term transitive inference. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 142–164.
LAZAR, R. (1977). Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 381–392.
LAZAR, R., & KOTLARCHYK, B. J. (1986). Second-order control of sequence-class equivalences in children. Behavioural Processes, 13, 205–215.
LUTKUS, A., & TRABASSO, T. (1974). Transitive inferences by preoperational, retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 599–606.
LYNCH, D. C., & GREEN, G. (1991). Development and crossmodal transfer of contextual control of emergent stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 139–154.
MACKAY, H. A., SPENCER, T. J., GREEN, G., & SIGURDARDOTTIR, Z. G. (1989, May). Stimulus sequences established by exclusion and emergent stimulus classes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee.
MACKAY, H. A., STODDARD, L. T., & SPENCER, T. J. (1989). Symbols and meaning classes: Multiple sequence production and the emergence of ordinal stimulus classes. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 7, 16–17.
MCGONIGLE, B. O. (1987). Non-verbal thinking by animals? Nature, 325, 110–112.
MCGONIGLE, B. O., & CHALMERS, M. (1977). Are monkeys logical? Nature, 267, 694–696.
MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., GREEN, G., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Programming conceptual and communication skill development: A methodological stimulus class analysis. In A. P. Kaiser & D. B. Gray (Eds.), Enhancing children’s communication (pp. 243–285). Baltimore: Brookes.
RILEY, C. A., & TRABASSO, T. (1974). Comparatives, logical structures, and encoding in a transitive inference task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 17, 187–203.
SAUNDERS, R. R., & GREEN, G. (1992). The nonequivalence of behavioral and mathematical equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 227–241.
SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.
SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
SIDMAN, M., & CRESSON, O. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 515–523.
SIDMAN, M., CRESSON, O., Jr., & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1974). Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 261–273.
SIDMAN, M., RAUZIN, R., LAZAR, R., CUNNINGHAM, S., TAILBY, W., & CARRIGAN, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23–44.
SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to-sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.
SIDMAN, M., WYNNE, C. K., MAGUIRE, R. W., & BARNES, T. (1989). Functional classes and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 261–274.
SIGURDARDOTTIR, Z. G., GREEN, G., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1990). Equivalence classes generated by sequence training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 47–63.
SKINNER, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
SPRADLIN, J. E., COTTER, V. W., & BAXLEY, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556–566.
STEVENS, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1–49). New York: John Wiley.
STRAUB, R. O., SEIDENBERG, M. S., BEVER, T. G., & TERRACE, H. S. (1979). Serial learning in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 137–148.
STRAUB, R. O., & TERRACE, H. S. (1981). Generalization of serial learning in the pigeon. Animal Learning and Behavior, 9, 454–468.
STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1990). A note of the study of transitive relations in stimulus sequences. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 8, 2–5.
STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1992). Conditional stimulus control of childrens sequence production’. Psychological Reports, 70, 903–912.
STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Human sequential behavior: Relations among stimuli, class formation, and derived sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 107–131.
STROMER, R., MACKAY, H. A., COHEN, M., & STODDARD, L. T. (in press). Sequence learning in individuals with behavioral limitations. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.
SWARTZ, K. B., CHEN, S., & TERRACE, H. S. (1991). Serial learning by rhesus monkeys: I. Acquisition and retention of multiple four-item lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 396–410.
TERRACE, H. S. (1986). A nonverbal organism’s knowledge of ordinal position in a serial learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 203–214.
THAYER, E. S., & COLLYER, C. E. (1978). The development of transitive inference: A review of recent approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1327–1343.
WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125–144.
VON FERSEN, L., WYNNE, C. D. L., DELIUS, J. D., & STADDON, J. E. R. (1991). Transitive inference formation in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 334–341.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this manuscript was supported by NICHD Grants HD25995 and HD26200, The Department of Mental Retardation of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Contract #100220023SC), and the New England Center for Autism.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Green, G., Stromer, R. & Mackay, H.A. Relational Learning in Stimulus Sequences. Psychol Rec 43, 599–615 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395902
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395902