Skip to main content
Log in

Stimulus Equivalence and Cross-Modal Transfer

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experiments investigated equivalence relations among auditory, visual, and tactile stimuli. In Experiment 1, three 6- and 7-year-old children learned conditional discriminations with auditory samples and tactile comparisons. In subsequent tests, they demonstrated that the conditional relations of the auditory and tactile stimuli were equivalence relations. Through cross-modal transfer, the classes also had extended to include novel visual stimuli that resembled the tactile stimuli in form and size. Experiment 2 reversed the role of the tactile and visual stimuli. After learning conditional discriminations with auditory samples and visual comparisons, the children demonstrated equivalence classes that included the training stimuli plus novel tactile stimuli that resembled the visual stimuli. One child in this experiment needed cross-modal training before the classes appeared. The experiments illustrate one way in which stimulus equivalence classes are extended and relate the paradigm of stimulus equivalence to studying perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BUSH, K. M., SIDMAN, M., & DEROSE, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CAIRNS, S. E., & COLL, P. (1977). The role of visual imagery in visual, tactual and cross-modal matching. British Journal of Psychology, 68, 213–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COSTALL, A. P. (1984). Are theories of perception necessary?: A review of Gibson’s The ecological approach to visual perception. Journal of the.Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 109–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COTÉ, J. J., & SCHAEFER, E. G. (1981). Perceptual processing strategies in the cross-modal transfer of form discrimination: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1340–1348.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DUBE, W. V., MCILVANE, W. J., MACKAY, H. A., & STODDARD, L. T. Stimulus class membership established via stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 47, 159–175.

  • ETTLINGER, G. (1977). In A. M. Schrier (Ed.), Behavioral primatology: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • FIELDS, L., REEVE, K. F., ADAMS, B. J., & VERHAVE, T. (1991). Stimulus generalization and equivalence classes: A model for natural categories. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 305–312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, G. (1990). Differences in development of visual and auditory-visual equivalence relations. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 260–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LAZAR, R. M. (1977). Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 381–392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LAZAR, R. M., & KOTLARCHYK, B. J. (1986). Second-order control of sequence-class equivalences in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOBB, H. (1970). Asymmetrical transfer of form discrimination across sensory modalities in human adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 350–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LYNCH, D. C., & GREEN, G. (1991). Development and crossmodal transfer of contextual control of emergent stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 139–154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MOLANDER, B., & GARVILL, J. (1979). The invariance of asymmetric cross-modal transfer effects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20, 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RABINOWITZ, R. M. (1983). Cross-modal transfer and intermediate-size transposition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. R. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & CRESSON, O. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 515–523.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., CRESSON, O., Jr., & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1974). Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 261–273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SOLSO, R. L., & RAYNIS, S. A. (1982). Transfer of prototypes based on visual, tactual, and kinesthetic exemplars. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 13–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WETHERBY, B., KARLAN, G. R., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1983). The development of derived stimulus relations through training in arbitrary-matching sequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 40, 69–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by Grant No. HD20688 from the NICHHD of the National Institutes of Health to Washington and Jefferson College.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bush, K.M. Stimulus Equivalence and Cross-Modal Transfer. Psychol Rec 43, 567–584 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395900

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395900

Navigation