Skip to main content
Log in

Responding Under Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Chained Schedules

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four pigeons responded under chained variable-interval schedules in which the required response topographies were either similar (i.e., a homogeneous chain) or dissimilar (i.e., a heterogeneous chain). The pigeons were exposed to all possible combinations of initial-link key pecking or treadle pressing and terminal-link pecking or treadling. Three of four birds displayed higher initial-link response rates under the homogeneous chains. These results were explained in terms of an induction effect in which the strengthening effect of reinforcing a particular terminal-link response topography generalizes to similar responses earlier in the chain but not to topographically different responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BROWN, P. L., & JENKINS, H. M. (1968). Auto-shaping of the pigeon’s key-peck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C., & REYNOLDS, G. S. (1968). A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 327–383.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • D’ANDREA, T. (1969). Extinction of a heterogeneous chain after several reinforcement schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 127–135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FLESHLER, M., & HOFFMAN, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 529–530.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KELLEHER, R., & GOLLUB, L. (1962). A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 543–597.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KELLER, F. S., & SCHOENFELD, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • LATTAL, K. A., & CRAWFORD-GODBEY, C. L. (1985). Homogeneous chains, heterogeneous chains, and delay of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 337–342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SCHROLL, P. (1985). Effects of time delays on autoshaping. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZ, B., & GAMZU, E. (1977). Pavlovian control of operant behavior. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 53–97). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

These data were part of a master’s thesis submitted to the faculty of The Graduate College at Western Michigan University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Starin, S.P. Responding Under Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Chained Schedules. Psychol Rec 37, 69–77 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395874

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395874

Navigation