Abstract
If judiciously applied, cognitive terminology can encourage further examination of phenomena in useful ways that may not otherwise be studied. I give examples of 3 phenomena, the study of which have benefitted from a cognitive perspective. For the first, transitive inference behavior, it appears that noncognitive accounts cannot satisfactorily account for the effects that have been found. For the second, functional equivalence, positing the development of common representations has identified the possible nature of those representations. For the third, cognitive dissonance (or justification of effort), producing it in the laboratory with nonhuman animals suggests that a simpler mechanism, such as positive contrast, may be involved. If one approaches cognitive terminology with an open mind and conducts well-designed experiments that juxtapose cognitive accounts against simpler accounts, cognitive terminology can be the impetus for experiments that explore phenomena in novel, exciting, and useful ways and that ultimately have considerable heuristic value.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ALESSANDRI, J., DARCHEVILLE, J.-C., DELEVOYE-TURRELL, Y., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2008). Preference for rewards that follow greater effort and greater delay. Learning & behavior, 36, 352–358.
ALESSANDRI, J., DARCHEVILLE, J.-C., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2008). Cognitive dissonance in children: Justifcation of effort or contrast? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 673–677.
BRYANT, P. E., & TRABASSO, T. (1971). Transitive inference and memory in young children. Nature, 232, 456–458.
CLEMENT, T. S., FELTUS, J., KAISER, D. H., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2000). “Work ethic” in pigeons: Reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 100–106.
COLLETT, T. S., & GRAHAM. P. (2004). Animal navigation: Path integration, visual landmarks, and cognitive maps. Current Biology, 14, 475–477.
COUVILLON, P. A., & BITTERMAN, M. E. (1992). A conventional conditioning analysis of “transitive inference” in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 308–310.
DAVIS, H. (1992). Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 342–349.
DIGIAN, K. A., FRIEDRICH, A. M., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2004). Discriminative stimuli that follow a delay have added value for pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 889–895.
DORRANCE, B. R., KAISER, D. H., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1998). value transfer in a simultaneous discrimination by pigeons: The value of the S+ is not specifc to the simultaneous discrimination context. Animal Learning & behavior, 26, 257–263.
DORRANCE, B. R., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1999). Within-event learning contributes to value transfer in simultaneous instrumental discrimination learning by pigeons. Animal Learning & behavior, 27, 206–210.
FARTHING, G. W., WAGNER, J. W., GILMOUR, S., & WAXMAN, H. M. (1977). Short-term memory and information processing in pigeons. Learning and Motivation, 8, 520–532.
FERSEN, L. V., WYNNE, C. D. L., DELIUS, J. D., & STADDON, J. E. R. (1991). Transitive inference formation in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 334–341.
FESTINGER, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
FRANK, A. J., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (2005). Associative symmetry in the pigeon after successive matching-to-sample training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 84, 147–165.
FRIEDRICH, A. M., CLEMENT, T. S., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2005). Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement. Learning & behavior, 33, 337–342.
FRIEDRICH, A. M., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2004). Pigeons shift their preference toward locations of food that take more effort to obtain. Behavioural Processes, 67, 405–415.
GILLAN, D. J. (1981). Reasoning in the chimpanzee II: Transitive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 150–164.
GRIFFIN, D. R. (1976). The question of animal awareness: Evolutionary continuity of mental experience. New York, NY: Rockefeller University Press.
HULL, C. L. (1939). The problem of stimulus equivalence in behavior theory. Psychological Review, 46, 9–30.
JOHNSON, A. W., & GALLAGHER, M. (2010). Greater effort boosts the affective taste properties of food. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1450–1456.
KACELNIK, A., & MARSH, B. (2002). Cost can increase preference in starlings. Animal Behaviour, 63, 245–250.
KLEIN, E. D., BHATT, R. S., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2005). Contrast and the justifcation of effort. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 335–339.
LAWRENCE, D. H., & FESTINGER, L. (1962). Deterrents and reinforcement. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
LAZAREVA, O. F., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (2006). Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 72, 161–172.
MCGONIGLE, B. O., & CHALMERS, M. (1977). Are monkeys logical? Nature, 267, 694–696.
MOORE, J. (2010). What do mental terms mean? The Psychological Record, 60, 699–714.
PI AGET, J. (1955). The child’s construction of reality. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
SCHOENFELD, W. N., & CUMMING, W. W. (1963). Behavior and perception. In S. Koch (ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (vol. 5, pp. 213–252). New york, NY: McGraw-Hill.
SHERBURNE, L. M., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1993). Asymmetrical coding of food and no-food events by pigeons: Sample pecking versus food as the basis of the sample code. Learning and Motivation, 24, 141–155.
SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. R. Blackman & H. Lejeune (eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
SIDMAN, M., CRESSON, O., JR, & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1974). Acquisition of matching-to-sample via mediated transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 22, 261–273.
SIDMAN, M., RAUZIN, R., LAZAR, R., CUNNINGHAM, S., TAILBY, W., & CARRIGAN, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discrimination of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 37, 23–44.
SINGER, R. A., ABROMS, B. D., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2007). Formation of a simple cognitive map by rats. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 19, 417–425.
SINGER, R. A., BERRY, L. M., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2007). Preference for a stimulus that follows a relatively aversive event: Contrast or delay reduction? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 8 7, 275–285.
SKINNER, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.
STEIRN, J. N., JACKSON-SMITH, P., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1991). Mediational use of internal representations of food and no-food events by pigeons. Learning and Motivation, 22, 353–365.
STEIRN, J. N., WEAVER, J. E., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1995). Transitive inference in pigeons: Simplifed procedures and a test of value transfer theory. Animal Learning & behavior, 23, 76–82.
TOLMAN, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
TULVING, E. (1962). Subjective organization in free recall of unrelated words. Psychological Review, 69, 344–354.
UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1957). Interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 64, 49–60.
URCUIOLI, P. J. (1996). Acquired equivalences and mediated generalization in pigeon’s matching-to-sample. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 55–70). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.
URCUIOLI, P. J. (2008). Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeons’ equivalence-class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 90, 257–282.
URCUIOLI, P. J., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1986). Retrospective memory in pigeons’ delayed matching-to-sample. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 69–77.
URCUIOLI, P. J., ZENTALL, T. R., JACKSON-SMITH, P., & STEIRN, J. N. (1989). evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: Retention, intertrial interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 264–273.
WEAVER, J. E., STEIRN, J. N., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1997). Transitive inference in pigeons: Control for differential value transfer. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 113–117.
WYNNE, C. D. L., VON FERSEN, L., & STADDON, J. E. R. (1992). Pigeons’ inferences are transitive and the outcome of elementary conditioning principles: A response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 313–315.
ZENTALL, T. R. (2005). A within-trial contrast effect and its implications for several social psychological phenomena. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 18, 273–297.
ZENTALL, T. R., DORRANCE, B. R., & CLEMENT, T. S. (1999). Differential inhibition and stimulus generalization cannot account for value transfer in simultaneous discrimination learning by pigeons: Reply to Aitken. Animal Learning & behavior, 27, 494–496.
ZENTALL, T. R., HOGAN, D. E., HOWARD, M. M., & MOORE, B. S. (1978). Delayed matching in the pigeon: Effect on performance of sample-specifc observing responses and differential delay behavior. Learning and Motivation, 9, 202–218.
ZENTALL, T. R., & SHERBURNE, L. M. (1994). Transfer of value from S+ to S-in a simultaneous discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 176–183.
ZENTALL, T. R., SHERBURNE, L. M., ROPER, K. L., & KRAEMER, P. J. (1996). value transfer in a simultaneous discrimination appears to result from within-event Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 68–75.
ZENTALL, T. R., SHERBURNE, L. M., & STEIRN, J. N. (1992). Development of excitatory backward associations during the establishment of forward associations in a delayed conditional discrimination by pigeons. Animal Learning & behavior, 20, 199–206.
ZENTALL, T. R., SHERBURNE, L. M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1993). Common coding in a many-to-one delayed matching task as evidenced by facilitation and interference effects. Animal Learning & behavior 21, 233–237.
ZENTALL, T. R., SHERBURNE, L. M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1995). Coding of hedonic and nonhedonic samples by pigeons in many-to-one delayed matching. Animal Learning & behavior, 23, 189–196.
ZENTALL, T. R., STEIRN, J. N., SHERBURNE, L. M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1991). Common coding in pigeons assessed through partial versus total reversals of many-to-one conditional and simple discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 194–201.
ZENTALL, T. R., URCUIOLI, P. J., JAGIELO, J. A., & JACKSON-SMITH, P. (1989). Interaction of sample dimension and sample-comparison mapping on pigeons’ performance of delayed conditional discriminations. Animal Learning & behavior, 17, 172–178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant HD060996.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zentall, T.R. The Heuristic Value of Cognitive Terminology. Psychol Rec 62, 321–336 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395805
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395805