Skip to main content
Log in

The Heuristic Value of Cognitive Terminology

  • Theoretical Articles
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If judiciously applied, cognitive terminology can encourage further examination of phenomena in useful ways that may not otherwise be studied. I give examples of 3 phenomena, the study of which have benefitted from a cognitive perspective. For the first, transitive inference behavior, it appears that noncognitive accounts cannot satisfactorily account for the effects that have been found. For the second, functional equivalence, positing the development of common representations has identified the possible nature of those representations. For the third, cognitive dissonance (or justification of effort), producing it in the laboratory with nonhuman animals suggests that a simpler mechanism, such as positive contrast, may be involved. If one approaches cognitive terminology with an open mind and conducts well-designed experiments that juxtapose cognitive accounts against simpler accounts, cognitive terminology can be the impetus for experiments that explore phenomena in novel, exciting, and useful ways and that ultimately have considerable heuristic value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALESSANDRI, J., DARCHEVILLE, J.-C., DELEVOYE-TURRELL, Y., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2008). Preference for rewards that follow greater effort and greater delay. Learning & behavior, 36, 352–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALESSANDRI, J., DARCHEVILLE, J.-C., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2008). Cognitive dissonance in children: Justifcation of effort or contrast? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 673–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRYANT, P. E., & TRABASSO, T. (1971). Transitive inference and memory in young children. Nature, 232, 456–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CLEMENT, T. S., FELTUS, J., KAISER, D. H., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2000). “Work ethic” in pigeons: Reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 100–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COLLETT, T. S., & GRAHAM. P. (2004). Animal navigation: Path integration, visual landmarks, and cognitive maps. Current Biology, 14, 475–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COUVILLON, P. A., & BITTERMAN, M. E. (1992). A conventional conditioning analysis of “transitive inference” in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 308–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIS, H. (1992). Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 342–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DIGIAN, K. A., FRIEDRICH, A. M., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2004). Discriminative stimuli that follow a delay have added value for pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 889–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DORRANCE, B. R., KAISER, D. H., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1998). value transfer in a simultaneous discrimination by pigeons: The value of the S+ is not specifc to the simultaneous discrimination context. Animal Learning & behavior, 26, 257–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DORRANCE, B. R., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1999). Within-event learning contributes to value transfer in simultaneous instrumental discrimination learning by pigeons. Animal Learning & behavior, 27, 206–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FARTHING, G. W., WAGNER, J. W., GILMOUR, S., & WAXMAN, H. M. (1977). Short-term memory and information processing in pigeons. Learning and Motivation, 8, 520–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FERSEN, L. V., WYNNE, C. D. L., DELIUS, J. D., & STADDON, J. E. R. (1991). Transitive inference formation in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 334–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • FESTINGER, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRANK, A. J., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (2005). Associative symmetry in the pigeon after successive matching-to-sample training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 84, 147–165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FRIEDRICH, A. M., CLEMENT, T. S., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2005). Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement. Learning & behavior, 33, 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FRIEDRICH, A. M., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2004). Pigeons shift their preference toward locations of food that take more effort to obtain. Behavioural Processes, 67, 405–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GILLAN, D. J. (1981). Reasoning in the chimpanzee II: Transitive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 150–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRIFFIN, D. R. (1976). The question of animal awareness: Evolutionary continuity of mental experience. New York, NY: Rockefeller University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HULL, C. L. (1939). The problem of stimulus equivalence in behavior theory. Psychological Review, 46, 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, A. W., & GALLAGHER, M. (2010). Greater effort boosts the affective taste properties of food. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1450–1456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KACELNIK, A., & MARSH, B. (2002). Cost can increase preference in starlings. Animal Behaviour, 63, 245–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KLEIN, E. D., BHATT, R. S., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2005). Contrast and the justifcation of effort. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 335–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LAWRENCE, D. H., & FESTINGER, L. (1962). Deterrents and reinforcement. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAZAREVA, O. F., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (2006). Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 72, 161–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MCGONIGLE, B. O., & CHALMERS, M. (1977). Are monkeys logical? Nature, 267, 694–696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MOORE, J. (2010). What do mental terms mean? The Psychological Record, 60, 699–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • PI AGET, J. (1955). The child’s construction of reality. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHOENFELD, W. N., & CUMMING, W. W. (1963). Behavior and perception. In S. Koch (ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (vol. 5, pp. 213–252). New york, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHERBURNE, L. M., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1993). Asymmetrical coding of food and no-food events by pigeons: Sample pecking versus food as the basis of the sample code. Learning and Motivation, 24, 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. R. Blackman & H. Lejeune (eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., CRESSON, O., JR, & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1974). Acquisition of matching-to-sample via mediated transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 22, 261–273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., RAUZIN, R., LAZAR, R., CUNNINGHAM, S., TAILBY, W., & CARRIGAN, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discrimination of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 37, 23–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SINGER, R. A., ABROMS, B. D., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2007). Formation of a simple cognitive map by rats. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 19, 417–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • SINGER, R. A., BERRY, L. M., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2007). Preference for a stimulus that follows a relatively aversive event: Contrast or delay reduction? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 8 7, 275–285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEIRN, J. N., JACKSON-SMITH, P., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1991). Mediational use of internal representations of food and no-food events by pigeons. Learning and Motivation, 22, 353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STEIRN, J. N., WEAVER, J. E., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1995). Transitive inference in pigeons: Simplifed procedures and a test of value transfer theory. Animal Learning & behavior, 23, 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TOLMAN, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • TULVING, E. (1962). Subjective organization in free recall of unrelated words. Psychological Review, 69, 344–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1957). Interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 64, 49–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P. J. (1996). Acquired equivalences and mediated generalization in pigeon’s matching-to-sample. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 55–70). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P. J. (2008). Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeons’ equivalence-class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 90, 257–282.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P. J., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1986). Retrospective memory in pigeons’ delayed matching-to-sample. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 69–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P. J., ZENTALL, T. R., JACKSON-SMITH, P., & STEIRN, J. N. (1989). evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: Retention, intertrial interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 264–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEAVER, J. E., STEIRN, J. N., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1997). Transitive inference in pigeons: Control for differential value transfer. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WYNNE, C. D. L., VON FERSEN, L., & STADDON, J. E. R. (1992). Pigeons’ inferences are transitive and the outcome of elementary conditioning principles: A response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 313–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R. (2005). A within-trial contrast effect and its implications for several social psychological phenomena. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 18, 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., DORRANCE, B. R., & CLEMENT, T. S. (1999). Differential inhibition and stimulus generalization cannot account for value transfer in simultaneous discrimination learning by pigeons: Reply to Aitken. Animal Learning & behavior, 27, 494–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., HOGAN, D. E., HOWARD, M. M., & MOORE, B. S. (1978). Delayed matching in the pigeon: Effect on performance of sample-specifc observing responses and differential delay behavior. Learning and Motivation, 9, 202–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., & SHERBURNE, L. M. (1994). Transfer of value from S+ to S-in a simultaneous discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 176–183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., SHERBURNE, L. M., ROPER, K. L., & KRAEMER, P. J. (1996). value transfer in a simultaneous discrimination appears to result from within-event Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 68–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., SHERBURNE, L. M., & STEIRN, J. N. (1992). Development of excitatory backward associations during the establishment of forward associations in a delayed conditional discrimination by pigeons. Animal Learning & behavior, 20, 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., SHERBURNE, L. M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1993). Common coding in a many-to-one delayed matching task as evidenced by facilitation and interference effects. Animal Learning & behavior 21, 233–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., SHERBURNE, L. M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1995). Coding of hedonic and nonhedonic samples by pigeons in many-to-one delayed matching. Animal Learning & behavior, 23, 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., STEIRN, J. N., SHERBURNE, L. M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1991). Common coding in pigeons assessed through partial versus total reversals of many-to-one conditional and simple discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 194–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., URCUIOLI, P. J., JAGIELO, J. A., & JACKSON-SMITH, P. (1989). Interaction of sample dimension and sample-comparison mapping on pigeons’ performance of delayed conditional discriminations. Animal Learning & behavior, 17, 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas R. Zentall.

Additional information

Preparation of this article was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant HD060996.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zentall, T.R. The Heuristic Value of Cognitive Terminology. Psychol Rec 62, 321–336 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395805

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395805

Key words

Navigation