Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Joint Stimulus Control by Complex Graph/Description Correspondences

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Joint stimulus control occurs when responding is determined by the correspondence of elements of a complex sample and a complex comparison stimulus. In academic settings, joint stimulus control of behavior would be evidenced by the selection of an accurate description of a complex graph in which each element of a graph corresponded to particular sentences and phrases in the description. The current research describes a test that detected various degrees of joint stimulus control by different combinations of elements, ranging from complete joint control by all elements to a lack of joint control by any elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALONSO-ALVAREZ, B., & PEREZ-GONZALEZ, L. A. (2006). Emergence of complex conditional discriminations by joint control of compound samples. The Psychological Record, 56, 447–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2000). Matching compound samples with unitary comparisons: Derived stimulus relations In adults and children. The Psychological Record, 50, 671–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRITCHFIELD, T. S., & PERONE, M. (1993). Verbal self-reports about matching to sample: Effects of the number of elements In a compound sample stimulus. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 193–214. doi:10.1901/jeab.1993.59-193

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • EMURIAN, H. H., & WEISS, S. J. (1972). Compounding discriminative stimuli controlling free-operant avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 249–256. doi:10.1901/jeab.1972.17-249

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., TRAVIS, R., ROY, D., YADLOVKER, E., DE AGUIAR-ROCHA, L., & STURMEY, P. (2009). Equivalence class formation: A method for teaching statistical interactions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 575–593.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FIENUP, D., COVEY, D., & CRITCHFIELD, T. (2010). Teaching brain-behavior relations economically with stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 19–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GOLDSTEIN, H. (1983). Recombinative generalization: Relationships between environmental conditions and the linguistic repertoires of language learners. Analysis and Intervention In Developmental Disabilities, 3, 279–293. doi:1016/0270-4684(83)90002-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOLDSTEIN, H. (1985). Enhancing language generalization using matrix and stimulus equivalence training. In S. Warren & A. K. Rogers-Warren (Eds.), Teaching functional language: Generalization and maintenance of language skills (pp. 225–249). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOLDSTEIN, H., & MOUSETIS, L. (1989). Generalized language learning by children with severe mental retardation: Effects of peers’ expressive modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 245–259. doi:10.19O1/jaba.1989.22-245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, D. F., & CUMMING, W. W. (1968). Some determiners of attention. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 157–166. doi:10.1901/jeab.1968.11-157

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KAMIN, L. J. (1968). “Attention-like” processes In classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimulation (pp. 9–31). Miami: University of Miami.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOWENKRON, B. (1998). Some logical functions of joint control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 327–354. doi:10.1901/jeab.1998.69-327

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LOWENKRON, B. (2006). An introduction to joint control. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 123–127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli In emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529–542. doi:10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • REYNOLDS, G. (1961). Attention In the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 203–208. doi:10.1901/jeab.1961.4-203

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli In delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 83–102. doi:10.1901/jeab.1993.59-83

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lanny Fields.

Additional information

This research was conducted with support from PSC-CUNY Research Award 61669–00–39 and CUNY Collaborative Research Grant 80209–09–13.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fields, L., Spear, J. Measuring Joint Stimulus Control by Complex Graph/Description Correspondences. Psychol Rec 62, 279–293 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395802

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395802

Key words

Navigation