Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interdependency Between Risk Assessments for Self and Other in the Field of Comparative Optimism: The Contribution of Response Times

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By introducing a response-time measure in the field of comparative optimism, this study was designed to explore how people estimate risk to self and others depending on the evaluation order (self/other or other/self). Our results show the interdependency between self and other answers. Indeed, while response time for risk assessment for the self does not vary depending on the evaluation order, assessment for an average other takes longer in the other/self than in the self/other order. Thus, prior self-estimate appears to facilitate the construction of subsequent risk estimates for others. Our data indicate that the two evaluation orders do not correspond to strictly equivalent procedures; the other/self order requires extra cognitive effort and leads to greater comparative optimism levels. These findings should alert researchers that the measurement procedures, classically considered as interchangeable in the area of comparative optimism, actually generate different ways to construct the answers. Our results are discussed in terms of anchoring and asymmetry effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AUCOTE, H. M., & GOLD, R. S. (2005). Non-equivalence of direct and indirect measures of unrealistic optimism. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 10(4), 376–383. doi:10.1080/1354850042000326601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BATES, T. C., & STOUGH, C. (1998). Improved reaction time method, information processing speed, and intelligence. Intelligence, 26(1), 53–62. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(99)80052-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAMPBELL, J., GREENAUER, N., MACALUSO, K., & END, C. (2007). Unrealistic optimism in Internet events. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1273–1284. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHAMBERS, J. R., WINDSCHITL, P. D., & SULS, J. (2003). Egocentrism, event frequency, and comparative optimism: When what happens frequently is “more likely to happen to me.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1343–1356. doi:10.1177/0146167203256870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CLEMENT, R. W., & KRUEGER, J. (2000). The primacy of self-referent information in social consensus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 279–299. doi:10.1348/014466600164471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DUNNING, D. (2002). The relation of self to social perception. In M. Leary and J. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 421–441). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUNNING, D., & HAYES, A. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 213–229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EISER, J. R., PAHL, S., & PRINS, Y. R. A. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and the direction of self-other comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 77–84. doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GILOVICH, T., & GRIFFIN, D. W. (2010). Judgment and decision making. In D. T. Gilbert and S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Pp. 542–588). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOLD, R. S. (2008). Unrealistic optimism and event threat. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13, 193–201. doi:10.1080/13548500701426745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HARRIS, P., & MIDDLETON, W. (1994). The illusion of control and optimism about health: On being less at risk but no more in control than others. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 369–386. doi:10.1039/FD9949900369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HIGGINS, E. T., & BARGH, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369–425. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.002101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HOORENS, V. (1995). Self-favoring biases, self-presentation and the self-other asymmetry in social comparison. Journal of Personality, 63, 793–817. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00317.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOORENS, V., & BUUNK, B. P. (1993). Social comparison of health risks: Locus of control, the person-positivity bias and unrealistic optimism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 291–302. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01088.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INGLEDEW, D. K., & BRUNNING, S. (1999). Personality, preventive health behaviour and comparative optimism about health problems. Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 193–208. doi:10.1177/135910539900400213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KARYLOWSKI, J. J. (1990). Social reference points and the accessibility of trait related information in self-other similarity judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 975–983. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KLAR, Y., & GILADI, E. E. (1999). Are most people happier than their peers, or are they just happy? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(5), 585–594. doi:10.1177/0146167299025005004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KOSINSKI, R. J. (2008). A literature review on reaction time. Clemson University, Department of Biological Sciences. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://biology.clemson.edu/bpc/bp/Lab/110/reaction.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • KRUGER, J., WINDSCHITL, P. D., BURRUS, J., FESSEL F., & CHAMBERS, J. R. (2008). The rational side of egocentrism in social comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 220–232. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LE BARBENCHON, E., MILHABET, I., STEINER, D. D., & PRIOLO, D. (2008). Social acceptance of exhibiting optimism. Current Research in Social Psychology, 14(4), 52–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • OTTEN, W., & VAN DER PLIGT, J. (1996). Context effects in the measurement of comparative optimism in probability judgments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 80–101. doi:10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PERLOFF, L., & FETZER, B. (1986). Self-other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimisation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 502–510. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRICE, P. C., PENTESCOT, H. C., & VOTH, R. D. (2002). Perceived event frequency and the optimistic bias: Evidence for a two-process model of personal risk judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 242–252. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROSE, J. P., ENDO, Y., WINDSCHITL, P. D., & SULS, J. (2008). Cultural differences in unrealistic optimism and pessimism: The role of egocentrism and direct vs. indirect comparison measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1236–1248. doi:10.1177/0146167208319764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SPITZENSTETTER, F. (2003). Biais d’optimisme et biais de mesure: L’évaluation relative ou absolue du risque personnel. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 58, 19–27. doi:10.1016/j.pto.2006.05.001

    Google Scholar 

  • WEINSTEIN, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WELKENHUYSEN, M., EVERS-KIEBOOMS, G., DECRUYENAERE, M., & VAN DEN BERGHE, H. (1996). Unrealistic optimism and genetic risk. Psychology and Health, 11, 479–492. doi:10.1080/08870449608401984

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Psychologie des Cognitions, Faculté de Psychologie (Université de Strasbourg), t12, rue Goethe, 67000, Strasbourg, France

    Florence Spitzenstetter & Sarah Schimchowitsch

Authors
  1. Florence Spitzenstetter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Schimchowitsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florence Spitzenstetter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spitzenstetter, F., Schimchowitsch, S. Interdependency Between Risk Assessments for Self and Other in the Field of Comparative Optimism: The Contribution of Response Times. Psychol Rec 62, 115–124 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395791

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395791

Key words

Search

Navigation