The Psychological Record

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 19–40 | Cite as

An Experimental Investigation of Cognitive Defusion

Article

Abstract

The current study compared cognitive defusion with other strategies in reducing the impact of experimentally induced negative emotional states. Sixty-seven undergraduates were assigned to one of three conditions (cognitive defusion, thought suppression, or control) and instructed in standardized approaches relevant to each condition before viewing film clips intended to elicit fear, sadness, and disgust. Participants then rated their experience of each emotion and completed a Stroop task intended to indirectly measure emotional arousal. While participants did not show any differences in their experience of emotions through self-report, significant differences on the Stroop task provided evidence of varying degrees of arousal between participants using defusion, suppression, and control strategies, with thought suppression and defusion showing the greatest reduction in arousal. These findings were retained after controlling for individual differences in negative affect and suggest that defusion is an effective strategy for reducing emotional distress but raise questions about the specific mechanisms involved in the process.

Key words

cognitive defusion acceptance and commitment therapy thought suppression emotional distress clinical psychology 

References

  1. ABRAMOWITZ, J. S., TOLIN, D. F., & STREET, G. P. (2001). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 683–703. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00057-XCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. BACH, P., & HAYES, S. C. (2002). The use of acceptance and commitment therapy to prevent the rehospitalization of psychotic patients: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 1129–1139. doi:10.1037/0022 -006X.70.5.1129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. BLACKLEDGE, J. T. (2007). Disrupting verbal processes: Cognitive defusion in acceptance and commitment therapy and other mindfulness-based psychotherapies. The Psychological Record, 57, 555–576.Google Scholar
  4. BLACKLEDGE, J. T., & HAYES, S. C. (2006). Using acceptance and commitment training in the support of parents of children diagnosed with autism. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 28, 1–18. doi:10.1300/J019v28n01_01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BOND, F. W., & BUNCE, D. (2000). Mediators of change in emotion-focused and problemfocused worksite stress management interventions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 156–163. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. CHARASH, M., & MCKAY, D. (2002). Attention bias for disgust. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 16, 529–541. doi:10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00171-8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. EASTERBROOK, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue-utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201. doi:10.1037/h0047707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. ECCLESTON, C., & CROMBEZ, G. (1999). Pain demands attention: A cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 356–366. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. GAUDIANO, B. A., & HERBERT, J. D. (2006). Acute treatment of inpatients with psychotic symptoms using acceptance and commitment therapy: Pilot results. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 415–437. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.02.007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. GIFFORD, E. V., KOHLENBERG, B. S., HAYES, S. C., ANTONUCCIO, D. O., PIASECKI, M. M., RASMUSSEN-HALL, M. L., Et al. (2004). Acceptance-based treatment for smoking cessation. Behavior Therapy, 35, 689–705. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80015-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. GROSS, J. J., & LEVENSON, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 87–108. doi:10.1080/02699939508408966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. GUTIERREZ, O., LUCIANO, C., RODRIGUEZ, M., & FINK, B. C. (2004). Comparison between an acceptance-based and a cognitive-control-based protocol for coping with pain. Behavior Therapy, 35, 767–783. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80019-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. HAIDT, J., MCCAULEY, C., & ROZIN, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  15. HAYES, S. C., & SMITH, S. (2005). Get out of your mind and into your life. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Press.Google Scholar
  16. HAYES, S. C., & STROSAHL, K. D. (2004). A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. HAYES, S. C., STROSAHL, K. D., & WILSON, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. HAYES, S. C., STROSAHL, K., WILSON, K. G., BISSETT, R. T., PISTORELLO, J., TOARMINO, D., Et al. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54, 553–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. HAYES, S. C., WILSON, K. G., GIFFORD, E. V., BISSETT, R., PIASECKI, M., BATTEN, S. V., Et al. (2004). A preliminary trial of twelve-step facilitation and acceptance and commitment therapy with polysubstance-abusing methadone-maintained opiate addicts. Behavior Therapy, 35, 667–688. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80014-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. HEALY, H., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., BARNES-HOLMES, D., KEOGH, C., LUCIANO, C., & WILSON, K. (2008). An experimental test of a cognitive defusion exercise: Coping with negative and positive self-statements. The Psychological Record, 58, 623–640.Google Scholar
  21. HERBERT, J. D., FORMAN, E. M., & ENGLAND, E. L. (2005). Psychological acceptance. In W. T. O’Donohue, J. E. Fisher, & S. C. Hayes (Eds.), Cognitive behavior therapy: Applying empirically supported techniques in your practice (pp. 102–113). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. IHSSEN, N., HEIM, S., & KEIL, A. (2007). The costs of emotional attention: Affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1932–1949. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. JOHANNSON, S., & HOFLAND, K. (1989). Frequency analysis of English vocabulary and grammar (Vol. 1). Oxford, UK: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  24. LANG, P. J. (1985). The cognitive psychophysiology of emotion: Fear and anxiety. In A. H. Tuma & J. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 131–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. LAPPALAINEN, R., LEHTONEN, T., SKARP, E., TAUBERT, E., OJANEN, M., & HAYES, S. C. (2007). The impact of CBT and ACT models using psychology trainee therapists: A preliminary controlled effectiveness trial. Behavior Modification, 31, 488–511. doi:10.1177/0145445506298436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. MACLEOD, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. MARCKS, B. A., & WOODS, D. W. (2005). A comparison of thought suppression to an acceptance-based technique in the management of personal intrusive thoughts: A controlled evaluation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 433–445. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.03.005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. MASUDA, A., HAYES, S. C., SACKETT, C. F., & TWOHIG, M. P. (2004). Cognitive defusion and self-relevant negative thoughts: Examining the impact of a ninety year old technique. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 477–485. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.10.008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. MASUDA, A., TWOHIG, M. P., STORMO, A. R., FEINSTEIN, A. B., CHOU, Y., & WENDELL, J. W. (2009). The effects of cognitive defusion and thought distraction on emotional discomfort and believability of negative self referential thoughts. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 11–17. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.08.006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. MCKAY, D., & TSAO, S. D. (2005). A treatment most foul: Handling disgust in cognitivebehavior therapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 19, 355–367. doi:10.1891/jcop.2005.19.4.355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MURIS, P., MERCKELBACH, H., & DE JONG, P. F. (1993). Verbalization and environmental cuing in thought suppression. Behavior Research and Therapy, 31, 609–612. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(93)90112-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. OLATUNJI, B. O., CISLER, J., MCKAY, D., & PHILLIPS, M. L. (2010). Is disgust associated with psychopathology? Emerging research in the anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Research, 175, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2009.04.007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. OLATUNJI, B. O., & MCKAY, D. (2009). Disgust and its disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  34. OLATUNJI, B. O., WILLIAMS, N. L., TOLIN, D. F., ABRAMOWITZ, J. S., SAWCHUK, C. N., LOHR, J. M., Et al. (2007). The disgust scale: Item-analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. Psychological Assessment, 19, 281–297. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. OLATUNJI, B. O., & WOLITZKY-TAYLOR, K. B. (2009). Anxiety sensitivity and the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 974–999. doi:10.1037/a0017428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. O’MALLEY, J. J., & GALLAS, J. (1977). Noise and attention span. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 919–922.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. POWERS, M. B., SMITS, J. A. J., LEYRO, T. M., & OTTO, M. W. (2007). Translational research perspectives on maximizing the effectiveness of exposure therapy. In D. C. S. Richard & D. L. Lauterbach (Eds.), Handbook of exposure therapies (pp. 109–126). Amsterdam: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. PURDON, C. (2005). Unwanted intrusive thoughts: Present status and future directions. In D. A. Clark (Ed.), Intrusive thoughts in clinical disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 226–244). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  39. RIEMANN, B. C., & MCNALLY, R. J. (1995). Cognitive processing of personally relevant information. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 325–340. doi:10.1080/02699939508408970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ROEMER, L., & BORKOVEC, T. D. (1994). Effects of suppressing thoughts about emotional material. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 467–474. doi:10.1037/0021 -843X.103.3.467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. STROOP, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. TAYLOR, S., ZVOLENSKY, M. J., COX, B. J., DEACON, B., HEIMBERG, R. G., LEDLEY, D. R., Et al. (2007). Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: Development and initial validity of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3. Psychological Assessment, 19, 176–188. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. TICHENER, E. B. (1916). A text-book of psychology. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  44. TWOHIG, M. P., HAYES, S. C., & MASUDA, A. (2006). Increasing willingness to experience obsessions: Acceptance and commitment therapy as a treatment for obsessivecompulsive disorder. Behavior Therapy, 37, 3–13. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2005.02.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. WATSON, D., CLARK, L. A., & TELLEGEN, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. WEGNER, D. M. (1989). White bears and other unwanted thoughts: Suppression, obsession, and the psychology of mental control. London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  47. WEGNER, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. WILLIAMS, J. M. G., WATTS, F. N., MACLEOD, C., & MATTHEWS, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. WOODS, D. W., WETTERNECK, C. T., & FLESSNER, C. A. (2006). A controlled evaluation of acceptance and commitment therapy plus habit reversal for trichotillomania. Behaviour and Research Therapy, 44, 639–656. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFordham University, t226 Dealy Hall, 441 East Fordham RoadBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations