Skip to main content
Log in

Humans and Monkeys Exert Metacognitive Control Based on Learning Difficulty in a Perceptual Categorization Task

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, Redford (2010) found that monkeys seemed to exert meta-cognitive control in a category-learning paradigm. Specifically, they selected more trials to view as the difficulty of the category-learning task increased. However, category-learning difficulty was determined by manipulating the family resemblance across the to-be-learned exemplars. Although this effectively influenced the learning difficulty, difficulty was confounded with novelty. For instance, a weak family resemblance made category learning difficult, but also increased the amount of perceptual change from trial to trial. The current research rules out novelty in favor of difficulty by manipulating the number of dots involved in the dot distortions while controlling the amount of perceptual change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BERAN, M. J., SMITH, J. D., REDFORD, J. S., & WASHBURN, D. A. (2006). Rhesus macaque. (Macaca mulatto) monitor uncertainty during numerosity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 111–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DUNLOSKY, J., & NELSON, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (Jol) and the delayed-Jol effect. Memory & Cognition, 20, 374–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FANTZ, R. (1958). Pattern vision in young infants. The Psychological Record, 8, 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOLUB, M. S., & GERMANN, S. L. (1998). Perinatal bupivacaine and infant behavior in rhesus monkeys. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 20, 29–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HAMPTON, R. R. (2001). Rhesus monkeys know when they remember. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 5359–5362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HOMA, D., & CULTICE, J. C. (1984). Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion on the acquisition and utilization of ill-defined categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Teaming, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • KORIAT, A., & BIORK, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Teaming, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • KORIAT, A., & MAAYAN, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Tanguage, 52, 478–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KORNELL, N., SON, L. K., & TERRACE, H. S. (2007). Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychological Science, 18, 64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NELSON, T. O., & NARENS, L. (1990). Metamemory: A. theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation. (pp. 125–141). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • POSNER, M. I., GOLDSMITH, R., & WELTON, K. E., JR. (1967). Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 28–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • QUINN, P., & EIMAS, P. (1986). Pattern-line effects and units of visual processing in infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REDFORD, J. S. (2010). Evidence of metacognitive control by humans and monkeys in a perceptual categorization task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Teaming, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 248–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIETH, C., & SIRETEANU, R. (1994). Texture segmentation and visual search based on orientation contrast: An infant study with the familiarization/ novelty preference method. Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RUMBAUGH, D. M., RICHARDSON, W. K., WASHBURN, D. A., SAVAGE-RUMBAUGH, E. S., & HOPKINS, W. D. (1989). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatto), video tasks, and implications for stimulus-response spatial contiguity. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 32–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELS, C. A., & EWY, R. (1985). Aesthetic perception of faces during infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SERRA, M. J., & DUNLOSKY, J. (2005). Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1258–1266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SHIELDS, W. E., SMITH, J. D., GUTTMANNOVA, K., & WASHBURN, D. A. (2005) Confidence judgments by humans and rhesus monkeys. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 165–186.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, J. D., BERAN, M. J., REDFORD, J. S., & WASHBURN, D. A. (2006). Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 282–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, J. D., & MINDA, J. P. (2002). Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 800–811.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, J. D., REDFORD, J. S., GENT, L. C., & WASHBURN, D. A. (2005). Visual search and the collapse of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, J. D., REDFORD, J. S., HAAS, S. M., COUTINHO, M. V. C., & COUCHMAN, J. J. (2008). The comparative psychology of same-different judgments by human. (Homo sapiens) and monkey (Macaca mulatto). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 361–374.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, J. D., SHIELDS, W. E., ALLENDOERFER, K. R., & WASHBURN, W. A. (1998). Memory monitoring by animals and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 227–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, J. D., SHIELDS, W. E., SCHULL, J., & WASHBURN, D. A. (1997). The uncertain response in humans and animals. Cognition, 62, 75–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SON, L. K., & KORNELL, N. (2005). Metaconfidence judgments in rhesus macaques: Explicit versus implicit mechanisms. In H. S. Terrace & J. Metcalfe (Eds.). The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness (pp. 296–320). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • THIEDE, K. W. (1999). The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 662–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • THIEDE, K. W., ANDERSON, M. C. M., & THERRIAULT, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, L. A. & PETRILL, S. A. (1994). Longitudinal predictions of school-age cognitive abilities from infant novelty preference. In J. C. Defries, R. Plomin, & D. W. Plomin (Eds.). Nature and nurture during middle childhood (pp. 77–85). Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • WASHBURN, D. A., & RUMBAUGH, D. M. (1992). Testing primates with joystick-based automated apparatus: Lessons from the Language Research Center’s Computerized Test System. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 24, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua S. Redford.

Additional information

Preparation of this article was supported by Grant HD-38051 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and by Grant BCS-0634662 from the National Science Foundation. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent the views of either funding body.

The author would like to thank Keith Thiede for his help in the preparation of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Redford, J.S. Humans and Monkeys Exert Metacognitive Control Based on Learning Difficulty in a Perceptual Categorization Task. Psychol Rec 60, 563–576 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395732

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395732

Keywords

Navigation