Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 551–562 | Cite as

Depressive Realism: Wiser or Quieter?

  • Fernando Blanco
  • Helena Matute
  • Miguel A. Vadillo
Article

Abstract

Depressive realism consists of the lower personal control over uncontrollable events perceived by depressed as compared to nondepressed individuals. In this article, we propose that the realism of depressed individuals is caused not by an increased accuracy in perception, but by their more comprehensive exposure to the actual environmental contingencies, which in turn is due to their more passive pattern of responding. To test this hypothesis, dysphoric and nondysphoric participants were exposed to an uncontrollable task and both their probability of responding and their judgment of control were assessed. As was expected, higher levels of depression correlated negatively with probability of responding and with the illusion of control. Implications for a therapy of depression are discussed.

Key words

experiential avoidance dysphoric mood private events functional response class human suffering mood induction rumination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACKERMANN, R., & DERUBEIS, R. J. (1991). Is depressive realism real? Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 565–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AESCHLEMAN, S. R., ROSEN, C. C, & WILLIAMS, M. R. (2002). The effect on non-contingent negative and positive reinforcement operations on the acquisition of superstitious behaviors. Behavioural Processes, 61, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ALLAN, L. G., SIEGEL, S., & HANNAH, S. (2007). The sad truth about depressive realism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 482–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ALLOY, L. B., & ABRAMSON, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and non-depressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ALLOY, L. B., & CLEMENTS, C. M. (1992). Illusion of control: Invulnerability to negative affect and depressive symptoms after laboratory and natural stressors. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 234–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. BECK, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  7. BECK, A. T., WARD, C.L.L, MENDELSON, M., MOCK, J., & ERBAUGH, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. BIRNBAUM, M. H. (Ed.). (2000). Psychological experiments on the Internet. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. BUCHANAN, T., & SMITH, J. L. (1999). Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 125–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. CONDE, V., ESTEBAN, L., & USEROS, E. (1976). Adaptaciôn castellana de la escala de evaluaciôn conductual para la depresiôn de Beck [Spanish adaptation of Beck’s depression inventory]. Revista de Psicologia General yAplicada, 31, 496–497.Google Scholar
  11. ELLIS, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Secaucus, NJ: Lyle Stuart.Google Scholar
  12. FORCAS, J. P. (1998). On being happy and mistaken: Mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 318–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FRANKEL, M. S., & SIANG, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research in cyberspace. Report of a workshop convened by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Program on Specific Freedom, Responsibility, and Law, Washington, Dc. Retrieved May 9, 2005, from http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/sfrl/projects/intres/main.htm.Google Scholar
  14. GOSLING, S. D., VAZIRE, S., SRIVASTAVA, S., & JOHN, O. P. (2004). Should we trust Web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. HAAGA, D. A. F., & BECK, A. T. (1995). Perspectives on depressive realism: Implications for cognitive theory of depression. Behavior Research and Therapy, 33, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. KRAUT, R., OLSON, J., BANAJI, M., BRUCKMAN, A., COHEN, J., & COUPER, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of board of scientific affairs’ advisory group on the conduct of research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59, 705–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. LANGER, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 301–328.Google Scholar
  18. LEWINSOHN, P. M. (1974). A behavioral approach to depression. In R. J. Friedman & M. M. Katz (Eds.), The psychology of depression: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 776–778). Washington, DC: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. LEWINSOHN, P. M., SULLIVAN, J. M., & GROSSCUP, S. J. (1980). Changing reinforcement events: An approach to the treatment of depression. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17, 322–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MATUTE, H. (1994). Learned helplessness and superstitious behavior as opposite effects of uncontrollable reinforcement in humans. Teaming and Motivation, 25, 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MATUTE, H. (1995). Human reactions to uncontrollable outcomes: Further evidence for superstitions rather than helplessness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 142–157.Google Scholar
  22. MATUTE, H. (1996). Illusion of control: Detecting response-outcome independence in analytic but not in naturalistic conditions. Psychological Science, 7, 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MATUTE, H., VADILLO, M. A., & BÂRCENA, R. (2007). Web-based experiment control software for research and teaching on human learning. Behavior Research Methods, 3, 689–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MATUTE, H., VADILLO, M. A., BLANCO, F., & MUSCA, S. C. (2007). Either greedy or well informed: The reward maximization-unbiased evaluation trade-off. In Proceedings of the Second European Cognitive Science Conference (pp. 341–346). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. MATUTE, H., VADILLO, M. A., VEGAS, S., & BLANCO, F. (2007). Illusion of control in Internet users and college students. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MSETFI, R. M., MURPHY, R. A., & SIMPSON, J. (2007). Depressive realism and the effect of inter-trial interval on judgments of zero, positive, and negative contingencies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MSETFI, R. M., MURPHY, R. A., SIMPSON, J., & KORNBROT, D. E. (2005). Depressive realism and outcome density bias in contingency judgments: The effect of the context and inter-trial interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. PLAUD, J. J., & EIFERT, G. H. (1998). From behavior theory to behavior therapy. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  29. REHM, L. P. (1977). A-self control model of depression. Behavior Therapy, 8, 787–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. REIPS, U-D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. RUDSKI, J. M. (2000). Effect of delay of reinforcement on superstitious inferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 1047–1058.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. RUDSKI, J. M., LISCHNER, M. I., & ALBERT, L. M. (1999). Superstitious rule generation is affected by probability and type of outcome. The Psychological Record, 49, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SCHWARTZ, B. (1981). Does helplessness cause depression, or do only depressed people become helpless? Comment on Alloy and Abramson. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. SELIGMAN, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  35. SHANKS, D. R., & DICKINSON, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 229–261). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. SKINNER, B. F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. SKINNER, E. A. (1985). Action, control judgments and the structure of control experience. Psychological Review, 92, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. STADDON, J. E. R., & SIMMELHAG, V. L. (1971). The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. STEYVERS, M., TENENBAUM, J. B., WAGENMAKERS, E. -J., & BLUM, B. (2003). Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cognitive Science, 27, 453–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. TAYLOR, S. E., & BROWN, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. THOMPSON, S. C, ARMSTRONG, W., & THOMAS, C. (1998). Illusions of control, underestimations and accuracy: A control heuristic explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. VADILLO, M. A., BÂRCENA, R., & MATUTE, H. (2006). The Internet as a research tool in the study of associative learning: An example from overshadowing. Behavioural Processes, 73, 36–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. VADILLO, M. A., & MATUTE, H. (2007). Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. WARD, W C, & ENKINS, H. M. (1965). The display of information and the judgment of contingency. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 19, 231–241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. WASSERMAN, E. A. (1990). Detecting response-outcome relations: Toward an understanding of the causal texture of the environment. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 27–82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Blanco
    • 1
  • Helena Matute
    • 1
  • Miguel A. Vadillo
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de PsicologíaUniversidad de DeustoBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations