Reexamination of the Association Between Anonymity and Self-Interested Unethical Behavior in Adults
- 14 Downloads
The well-established notion that the frequency of self-interested unethical behavior increases among anonymous people was reexamined employing a more strict definition of anonymity, voluntary unethical behavior, and adult individuals. Anonymity was defined as nonassociability of the participant’s traits with respect to unethical behavior. The participant’s identity and a monetary reward were manipulated as the independent variables, while cheating behavior was observed as the dependent variable. A sample of 143 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 conditions (nonidentifiable-reward, identifiable-reward, nonidentifiable-nonreward, or identifiable-nonreward condition) to flip a coin twice in the experimental assignment. Results indicated that participants behaved differently depending on anonymity status and reward status. Implications for unethical behavior among anonymous individuals are discussed.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- BANDURA, A., & WALTERS, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
- DUVAL, T. S., & WICKLUND, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- HARAOKA, K. (1990). Attitude and value: Orientation toward money attitude structure and composition of an attitude scale. [Okane ni taisuru taido to kachisikou I: Taido no kouzou to taidoshakudo no kousei]. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Nagoya University (Educational Psychology), Japan, 37, 199–216.Google Scholar
- KERR, N. L. (1999). Anonymity and social control in social dilemmas. In M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas (pp. 103–119). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- TSUJIOKA, Y., & MURAYAMA, S. (1975). Six dimensions of value judgment [Kachikan no rokujigen]. Proceedings of the Department of Sociology, Kansai University, Japan, 7, 161–174.Google Scholar
- ZIMBARDO, P. G. (1969) The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 237–307). Lincoln, Ne: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- ZIMBARDO, P. G. (2004). A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil: Understanding how good people are transformed into perpetrators. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil: Understanding our capacity for kindness and cruelty (pp. 21–50). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar