Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing Learning in the Introductory Course

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an examination of the effects of timing of feedback on student learning, participants were randomly assigned to complete five introductory course tests using either control (Scantron form) or one of three feedback (end-of-test, 24-hr delay, immediate) procedures. A cumulative final examination with 50 new items and 10 items repeated from each course test was used to assess retention during the academic semester. Fifty final examination items, administered at postcourse intervals of 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, were used to measure longer-term retention. The provision of feedback at either the end of a test or after a 24-hr delay, relative to control procedures, increased retention for 3 to 5 weeks during the semester. Robust enhancement of retention at all intervals was observed only when immediate feedback was provided. The magnitude of the immediate feedback effect indicates that students benefit from affirmation of correct responding and notification of incorrect responding during classroom tests and suggests noteworthy potential for creating learnable moments during which students validate and self-correct their knowledge stores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BLOOM, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROSVIC, G. M., EPSTEIN, M. L., DIHOFF, R. E., & COOK, M. J. (2005). Efficacy of error for the correction of initially-incorrect assumptions and of feedback for the affirmation of correct responding: Learning in the classroom. The Psychological Record, 55, 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROSVIC, G. M., EPSTEIN, M. L., DIHOFF, R. E., & COOK, M. J. (2006a). Feedback facilitates the acquisition and retention of numerical fact series by elementary school students with mathematics learning disabilities. The Psychological Record, 56, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROSVIC, G. M., EPSTEIN, M. L., DIHOFF, R. E., & COOK, M. J. (2006b). Adjunctive role for immediate feedback in the acquisition and retention of mathematical fact series by elementary school students classified with mild mental retardation. The Psychological Record, 55, 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROSVIC, G. M., EPSTEIN, M. L., DIHOFF, R. E., & COOK, M. J. (2006c). Retention of Esperanto is affected by delay interval task and item closure: A partial resolution of the delay-retention effect. The Psychological Record, 56, 597–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, A. S., SCHILLING, H., & HOCKENSMITH, M. L. (1999). The Negative Suggestion Effect: Pondering incorrect alternatives may be hazardous to your knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 756–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRUNING, R., SCHRAW, G., & RONNING, R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Columbus, Oh: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARSTENS, C. B., & BECK, H. P. (1986). The relationship of high school psychology and natural science courses to performance in a college introductory psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 116–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEDERSTORM, J. A. (1930). Retention of information gained in courses in college zoology. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 38, 516–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIHOFF, R. E., BROSVIC, G. M., & EPSTEIN, M. L. (2003). The role of feedback during academic testing: The delay retention effect revisited. The Psychological Record, 53, 533–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIHOFF, R. E., BROSVIC, G. M., & EPSTEIN, M. L. (2004). Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. The Psychological Record, 54, 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOMBRODT, F., & POPPLESTONE, J. (1975). High school psychology revisited: Student performance in a college-level psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, M. L., BROSVIC, G. M., DIHOFF, R. E., LAZARUS, A. D., & COSTNER, K. L. (2003). Effectiveness of feedback during the testing of preschool children, elementary school children, and adolescents with developmental delays. The Psychological Record, 53, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, M. L., LAZARUS, A. D., CALVANO, T. B., MATTHEWS, K. A., HENDEL, R. A., EPSTEIN, B. B., & BROSVIC, G. M. (2002). Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. The Psychological Record, 52, 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EURICH, A. D. (1934). Retention of knowledge acquired in a course in general psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18, 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOLDWATER, B. C., & ACKER, L. E. (1975). Instructor-paced, mass testing for mastery performance in an introductory psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 151–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREENE, E. B. (1931). The retention of information learned in college courses. Journal of Educational Research, 24, 262–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HURSH, D. E. (1976). Personalized systems of instruction: What do the data indicate? Journal of Personalized Instruction, 1, 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, P. O. (1930). The permanence of learning in elementary botany. Journal of Educational Psychology, 21, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KELLER, F. S. (1968). Good-bye teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KULHAVY, R. W., & STOCK, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 279–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KULIK, J. A., JASKA, P., & KULIK, C. (1978). Research on component features of Keller’s personalized system of instruction. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 3, 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOFTUS, E., & HOFFMAN, H. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 100–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NATHANSON, C., PAULHUS, D. L., & WILLIAMS, K. M. (2004). The challenge to cumulative learning: Do introductory courses actually benefit advanced students? Teaching of Psychology, 31, 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROBIN, A. L. (1978). The timing of feedback in personalized instruction. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 3, 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEMB, G. B., & ELLIS, J. A. (1992, April). Knowledge learned in college: What is remembered? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEMB, G. B., ELLIS, J. A., & ARAUJO, J. (1993). Long-term retention for knowledge learned in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1958) Teaching machines. Science, 128, 969–977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SPITZER, H. F. (1939). Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 641–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, R. A., & ZAMBOANGA, B. L. (2003). Prior knowledge and its relevance to student achievement in introduction to psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 96–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TYLER, R. W. (1933). Permanence of learning. Journal of Higher Learning, 1, 203–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • WERT, J. E. (1937). Twin examination assumptions. Journal of Higher Education, 8, 136–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Rider University, Lawrenceville, NJ, 08648, USA

    Gary M. Brosvic & Michael L. Epstein

Authors
  1. Gary M. Brosvic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael L. Epstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary M. Brosvic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brosvic, G.M., Epstein, M.L. Enhancing Learning in the Introductory Course. Psychol Rec 57, 391–408 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395584

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395584

Search

Navigation