Psychology has largely ignored the distinction between constructs and events and what comprises a scientific construct, yet this distinction is basic to some of the major divisions of thought within the discipline. Several kinds of constructs are identified and compared with events, and improper use of constructs is noted of which the mind construct is a prime example. After indicating some problems with a failure to maintain the distinction between constructs and events and to establish constructs based on events, a list of criteria for scientific employment of constructs is proposed as a means of clarifying and advancing work in psychology. An example of a construct-based and of an event-based approach provides a contrast in scientific orientation with the implication that only by using the latter can psychology remedy its fragmentation and make advancements as a science.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
ADAMS, G. L., & ENGELMANN, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond Distar. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
BARBER, T. X. (1981). Hypnosis: A scientific approach. South Orange, NJ: Power.
BARKOW, J. H., COSMIDES, L., & TOOBY, J. (Eds.) (1992). Introduction. In J. H Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
BARRET, L., DUNBAR, R., & LYCET, J. (2002). Human evolutionary psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
BAXTER, C. (1994). An interbehavioral approach to teaching and problem solving in education. Effective School Practices, 12(4)/13(1), 34–38.
BAXTER, C. (2006). A new and revolutionary psychology of effective teaching: The applied science of interactive communication. Unpublished manuscript
BEM, S., & LOOREN dE JONG, H. (1997). Theoretical issues in psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.
BENNET, M. R., & HACKER, P. M. S. (2001). Perception and memory in neuroscience: A conceptual analysis. Progress in Neurobiology, 65, 499–543.
BORNSTEIN, R. F. (1988). Radical behaviorism, internal states, and the science of psychology: A reply to Skinner. American Psychologist, 43, 819–821.
BROWN, S. R (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q-methodology in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
BROWN, S. R. (1994–1995). Q methodology as the foundation for a science of subjectivity. Operant Subjectivity, 18, 1–16.
BROWN, W. H., BRYSON-BROCKMAN, W., & FOX, J. (1986). The usefulness of J. R. Kantor’s setting event concept for research on children’s social behavior. Child and Family Therapy, 8, 15–25.
CHAPIN, J. J. (1985). Dictionary of psychology (2nd ed. rev.). New York: Dell
CLARK, J. M., & PAIVIO, A. (1989). Observational and theoretical terms in psychology. American Psychologist, 44, 500–512.
CLAYTON, M. C., HAYES, L. J., & SWAIN, M. W. (2005). The nature and value of scientific system building: The case of interbehaviorism. The Psychological Record, 55, 335–359.
DELPRATO, D. (1979). The interbehavioral alternative to brain dogma. The Psychological Record, 29, 409–418.
EBEL, R. L. (1974). And still the dryads linger. American Psychologist, 29, 485–492.
ENGLISH, H. B., & ENGLISH, A. C. (1958). A comprehensive dictionary of psychological and psychoanalytic terms: A guide to usage. New York: Longmans, Green.
EVERSON, S. (1997). Aristotle on perception. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
FREMAN, W. J. (2001). Three centuries of category errors in studies of the neural basis of consciousness and intentionality. In W. S. Sulis & I. Trofimova (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in the life and social sciences (pp. 275–285). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
GANDER, E. M. (2003). On our minds: How evolutionary psychology is reshaping the nature-versus-nurture debate. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
GROSSBERG, J. M. (1972). Brain wave feedback experiments and the concept of mental mechanism. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 3, 245–251.
HARRÉ, R., & LAMB, R. (Eds.). (1983). The encyclopedic dictionary of psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
KANTOR, J. R. (1922). The nervous system, psychological fact or fiction? Journal of Philosophy, 19, 38–49.
KANTOR, J. R. (1947). Problems of physiological psychology. Bloomington, IN: Principia.
KANTOR, J. R. (1953). The logic of modern science. Bloomington, IN: Principia.
KANTOR, J. R. (1957). Events and constructs in the science of psychology; Philosophy: Banished and recalled. The Psychological Record, 7, 55–60.
KANTOR, J. R. (1959). Interbehavioral psychology: A sample of scientific system construction. Bloomington, IN: Principia.
KANTOR, J. R. (1963–1969). The scientific evolution of psychology (Vols. 1-2). Chicago: Principia.
KANTOR, J. R. (1978). Cognition as events and as psychic constructs. The Psychological Record, 38, 329–342.
KANTOR, J. R. (1981). Interbehavioral psychology and the logic of science. The Psychological Record, 31, 3–11.
KANTOR, J. R. (1982). Cultural psychology. Chicago, IL: Principia.
KANTOR, J. R. (1983). Explanation: Psychological nature, role in scientific investigation. Revista Mexicana de Análysis de la Conducta, 9, 29–38.
KOSSLYN, S. M. (1995). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
LICHTENSTEIN, P. E. (1984). Interbehaviorism in psychology and in the philosophy of science. The Psychological Record, 34, 455–475.
LICKLITER, R. (2006). Developmental systems and psychological science. In B. D. Midgley & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on J. R. Kantor and interbehaviorism (pp. 173–194). Reno, NV: Context Press.
MCHUGH, P. R. (1999, Dec.). How psychiatry lost its way. Commentary, 108(5), 32–28.
MOORE, J. (1998). On behaviorism, theories, and hypothetical constructs. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 19, 215–242.
NATSOULAS, T. (1978). Consciousness. American Psychologist, 33, 906–914.
NATSOULAS, T. (1983). Addendum to “consciousness.” American Psychologist, 38, 121–122.
OAKLEY, R. (2004). How mind hurts and heals the body. American Psychologist, 59, 29–40.
Observer. (1983). Meanings as events and as constructions in psychology and linguistics. The Psychological Record, 33, 433–430.
PINKER, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
POSNER, M. I., & RAICHLE, M. E. (1994). Images of mind. New York: Scientific American Library.
RANDALL, J. H. (1960). Aristotle. New York: Columbia University Press.
REBER, A. S., & REBER, E. S. (2001). The Penguin dictionary of psychology (3rd ed.). London: Penguin Books.
REESE, H. W. (2001). Some recent recurrent issues in the history of behavioral sciences. The Behavior Analyst, 24, 227–239.
RICHERSON, P. J., & BOYD, R. (1998). The evolution of ultra-sociality. In I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt & F. Salter (Eds.), Indoctrinability, ideology and warfare: Evolutionary perspectives (pp. 71–95). New York: Berghahn.
RYLE, G. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.
SCHLINGER, H. D. (2003). The myth of intelligence. The Psychological Record, 53, 15–32.
SHAPIRO, Y. (1997). The consciousness hype: What do we want explained? Theory and Psychology, 7, 837–856.
SHUTE, C. (1944). The psychology of Aristotle. New York: Columbia University Press.
SIMON, H. (1992). What is an “explanation” of behavior? Psychological Science , 3, 150–161.
SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
SKINNER, B. F. (1963). Behaviorism at fifty. Science, 149, 951–958.
SKINNER, B. F. (1990). Can psychology be a science of mind? American Psychologist, 45, 1206–1210.
SMITH, N. W. (1987). Cognitive interbehaviour. In A. Costall & A. Still (Eds.), Cognitive psychology in question (pp. 194–212). Brighton, England: Harvester Press.
SMITH, N. W. (1993a). Alternatives to recurring problems in psychology. In N. W. Smith (Ed.), Greek and interbehavioral psychology: Selected and revised papers (Rev. ed., pp. 169–197). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
SMITH, N. W. (1993b). Indo-European psychological concepts and the shift to psychophysical dualism. In N. W. Smith (Ed.), Greek and interbehavioral psychology: Selected and revised papers (Rev. ed., pp. 61–71). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
SMITH, N. W. (1997). Consciousness: Events or constructs? In L. J. Hayes & P. M. Ghezzi (Eds.), Investigations in behavioral epistemology (pp. 147–161). Reno, NV: Context Press.
SMITH, N. W. (2001). Current systems in psychology: History, theory, research, and applications. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
SMITH, N. W. (2006). Interbehavioral research. In E. K. Morris & B. D. Midgley (Eds.), Perspectives on J. R. Kantor and interbehaviorism (pp. 111–171). Reno, NV: Context Press.
STEBINS, L. B., St. PIERE, R. G., PROPER, E. C., ANDERSON, R. B., & CERVA, T. R. (1977). An evaluation of follow through. Education as Experimentation series. Vol. IV-A-D. Cambridge, MA: ABT Associates.
STEPHENSON, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-techniques and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
SUTHERLAND, S. (1996). The international dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Crossroad.
UTAL, W. R. (2001). The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
VALENSTEIN, E. S. (1998). Blaming the brain: The truth about drugs and mental health. New York: Free Press.
WATKINS, A. J. (1990). Mediationism and the obfuscation of memory. American Psychologist, 45, 328–335.
WATKINS, C. L. (1988). Project follow-through: A story of the identification and neglect of effective instruction. Youth Policy, 10(7), 7–11.
WHITE, L. (1939). Mind is minding. The Scientific Monthly, 48, 169–171.
WOLMAN, B. B. (1989). Dictionary of behavioral science. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
WOODWORTH, R. S. (1929). Psychology. (Rev. ed.). New York: Henry Holt.