Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive Appraisal of Dissertation Stress Among Undergraduate Students

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined changes in primary and secondary appraisal, and coping strategies utilized in the final weeks leading to dissertation submission. Sixty volunteer Sports Studies dissertation students (male: n = 29; female: n = 31) completed an adapted Cognitive Appraisal of Health Scale (CAHS: Kessler, 1998), and Brief COPE (Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989) on 4 occasions over the 6 weeks before dissertation submission. Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance indicated a significant main effect for gender, with no main effect for changes over time and no significant interaction effect. Results demonstrated that males perceived the dissertation to be significantly more threatening and less challenging than females. With regard to coping, males used more active coping, positive reframing, planning, and acceptance of the stressor, with lower scores for self-blame, venting of emotions, and behavioral disengagement. The results suggest that, for this student population, the dissertation did not become increasingly stressful in the period before submission. Clear relationships were also evidenced between primary appraisal, secondary appraisal, and coping. Future research should seek to identify factors that moderate the influence of situational stressors on coping responses among undergraduate students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALDWIN, C. M. (1994). Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspective. New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSHEL, M. H., & DELANY, J. (2001). Sources of acute stress, cognitive appraisals, and coping strategies of male and female child athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24, 329–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSHEL, M. H., KIM, K. W., KIM, B. H., CHANG, K. J., & EOM, H. J. (2001). A model for coping with stressful events in sport: Theory, application, and future directions. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 32, 43–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • BURNS, K. R., & EGAN, E. C. (1994). Description of a stressful encounter: Appraisal, threat and challenge. Journal of Nursing Education, 33, 21–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CARVER, C. S., SCHEIER, M. F., & WEINTRAUB, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COLLINS, K. M. T., & ONWUEGBUZIE, A. J. (2003). Study coping and examinationtaking coping strategies: The role of learning modalities among female graduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1021–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FOLKMAN, S., & LAZARUS, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FOLKMAN, S., & LAZARUS, R. S. (1985). If it changes, it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FOLKMAN, S., LAZARUS, R. S., DUNKEL-SCHETIER, C., DELONGIS, A., & GREUN, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FRYDENBERG, E. (2002). Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions and challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • GOULD, D., UDRY, E., BRIDGES, D., & BECK, L. (1997). Coping with season ending injuries. The Sport Psychologist, 11, 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREENGLASS, E. R. (1982). A world of difference: Gender roles in perspective. Toronto: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREENGLASS, E. R. (1993). The contribution of social support to coping strategies. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42, 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KESSLER, T. A. (1998). The Cognitive Appraisal of Health Scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Research in Nursing and Health, 21, 73–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KIRAN, R., SHANAZ, M., & SUBBAKRISHNA, D. K. (2000). Appraisal of stress and coping behaviour in college students. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 26, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • KROHNE, H. W. (1993). Vigilance and cognitive avoidance as concepts in coping research. In H. W. Krohne (Ed.), Attention and avoidance: Strategies in coping with aversiveness (pp. 19–50). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • LANE, A. M., DEVON PORT, T. J., & HORRELL, A. (2004). Self-efficacy and research methods. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 3, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LAZARUS, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAZARUS, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 1993 (pp. 1–21). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAZARUS, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAZARUS, R. S., & FOLKMAN, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • MATHENY, K. B., AYCOCK, D. W., & MCCARTHY, C. J. (1993). Stress in schoolaged children and youth. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MATIHEWS, G., & ZEIDNER, M. (2000). Emotional Intelligence, adaptation to stressful encounters, and health outcomes. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace. San FrancisCO: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • PIKO, B. (2001). Gender differences and similarities in adolescents’ ways of coping. The Psychological Record, 51, 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracey J. Devonport.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Devonport, T.J., Lane, A.M. Cognitive Appraisal of Dissertation Stress Among Undergraduate Students. Psychol Rec 56, 259–266 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395549

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395549

Navigation