Abstract
Resurgence may be defined generally as the extinction-induced recurrence of previously learned response patterns. Understanding the conditions under which this phenomenon occurs has theoretical, clinical, and applied implications, particularly with respect to a related area of research on response-class hierarchies. In the current study, we examined resurgence with 2 participants who exhibited response-class hierarchies consisting of various topographies of severe problem behavior maintained by positive reinforcement. Baseline levels of responding were maintained by brief access to tangible items. In a second condition, reinforcement was produced by an alternative topography of severe problem behavior, and the initial topography was extinguished concurrently. When the reinforcement contingency for alternative behavior was removed, previously reinforced topographies recovered. This resurgence was specific to behavior that recently produced the reinforcer, which suggests that the recovery was not simply extinction-induced variation or emotional responding. The clinical implications of the results are discussed and related to results that have been produced in the laboratory by a variety of methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ANTONITIS, J. J. (1951). Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 273–281.
AZRIN, N. H., HUTCHINSON, R. R., & HAKE, D. F. (1966). Extinction-induced aggression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 191–204.
DAVISON, M., & MCCARTHY, D. (1988). The matching law: A research review. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
ECKERMAN, D. A., & LANSON, R. N. (1969). Variability of response location for pigeons responding under continuous reinforcement, intermittent reinforcement, and extinction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 73–80.
EPSTEIN, R. (1983). Resurgence of previously reinforced behavior during extinction. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 3, 391–397.
EPSTEIN, R. (1985). Extinction-induced resurgence: Preliminary investigations and possible applications. The Psychological Record, 35, 143–153.
EPSTEIN, R. (1991). Skinner, creativity, and the problem of spontaneous behavior. Psychological Science, 2, 362–370.
EPSTEIN, R., & SKINNER, B. F. (1980). Resurgence of responding during the cessation of response-independent reinforcement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 77, 6251–6253.
HARDING, J. W., WACKER, D. P., BERG, W. K., BARRETTO, A., WINBORN, L., & GARDNER, A. (2001). Analysis of response class hierarchies with attention-maintained problem behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 61–64.
IWATA, B. A., DORSEY, M. F., SLIFER, K. J., BAUMAN, K. E., & RICHMAN, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).
LEITENBERG, H., RAWSON, R. A., & BATH, K. (1970). Reinforcement of competing behavior during extinction. Science, 169, 301–303.
LEITENBERG, H., RAWSON, R. A., & MULICK, J. A. (1975). Extinction and reinforcement alternative behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 88, 640–652.
LERMAN, D. C., & IWATA, B. A. (1996). Developing a technology for the use of operant extinction in clinical settings: An examination of basic and applied research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 345–382.
LIEVING, G. A., & LATTAL, K. A. (2003). Recency, repeatability, and reinforcer retrenchment: An experimental analysis of resurgence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 80, 217–233.
LINDBLOM, L. L., & JENKINS, H. M. (1981). Responses eliminated by noncontingent or negatively contingent reinforcement recover in extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 175–190.
RICHMAN, D. M., WACKER, D. P., ASMUS, J. M., CASEY, S. D., & ANDELMAN, M. (1999). Further analysis of problem behavior in response class hierarchies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 269–283.
SHAHAN, T. A., & CHASE, P. N. (2002). Novelty, stimulus control, and operant variability. The Behavior Analyst, 25, 175–190.
STADDON, J. E. R., & SIMMELHAG, V. L. (1971). The ‘superstition’ experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3–43.
WILLIAMS, B. A., & WIXTED, J. T. (1986). An equation for behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 47–62.
WILSON, K. G., & HAYES, S. C. (1996). Resurgence of derived stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 267–281.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lieving, G.A., Hagopian, L.P., Long, E.S. et al. Response-class hierarchies and resurgence of severe problem behavior. Psychol Rec 54, 621–634 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395495
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395495