Abstract
Previous studies have shown that after being trained on A-B and A-C match-to-sample tasks, adults match not only same-class B and C stimuli (equivalence) but also BC compounds with same- class elements and with different-class elements (BC-BC). The assumption was that the BC-BC performances are based on matching equivalence and nonequivalence relations (equivalence- equivalence). The present study examined if the BC-BC performances could have resulted from matching stimuli with same discriminative (S+, S-) properties. In Experiment 1, the subjects were first trained on a simple Q discrimination task (Q1+/Q2-). After testing the discriminative functions of these stimuli independent from one another, conditional A-B and A-C discriminations were trained. Finally, 3 tests were presented. One test assessed equivalence (B-C, C-B). The second test permitted matching on the basis of same functional (equivalence, nonequivalence) relations (BC-BC). The third test measured the S+ function of compounds with same-class elements and the S- function of compounds with different-class elements (BC/BC), or matching on the basis of same discriminative functions (Q-BC). The order of the tests varied across conditions except that the equivalence test was always presented first. Experiment 2 was the same except that the equivalence was tested last. In both experiments, almost all subjects demonstrated equivalence and selected compounds with same-class elements during a simple BC discrimination test (e.g., B1C1+/B1C2-). Most of these subjects also matched Q and BC stimuli of same discriminative functions (e.g., Q1-B1C1, Q2-B1C2), and BC compounds with same- and with different-class elements (B1C1-B3C3, B2C3- B3C2), more so in Experiment 1 than in Experiment 2. These findings indicate that the BC-BC performances result from matching same discriminative functions. The implications of these findings for equivalence-equivalence as a model for classical analogies are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Augustson, E. M., Dougher, M. J., & Markham, M. R. (2000). Emergence of conditional stimulus relations and transfer of respondent eliciting functions among compound stimuli. The Psychological Record, 50, 745–770.
Barnes, D., Hegarty, N., & Smeets, P. M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: A relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 57–83.
CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2000). Matching compound samples with unitary comparisons: Derived stimulus relations in adults and children. The Psychological Record, 50, 671–685.
CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2002a). Establishing transfer of compound control in children: A stimulus control analysis. The Psychological Record, 52, 139–158.
CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2002b). Matching functionally same relations: Implications for equiivalence-equivalence as a model for analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 52, 351–370.
CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2002c). Class formation of unrelated stimuli with same discriminative functions. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 3, 7–19.
CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2003a). Equivalence-equivalence as a model of analogy: Further analyses. The Psychological Record, 53, 3, 349–372.
CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2003b). Matching unrelated stimuli with same discriminative functions: Training order effects. Behavioural Processes. 60, 215–226.
DOUGHER, M. J., & MARKHAM, M. R. (1994). Stimulus equivalence, functional equivalence, and the transfer of function. In S. C. Hayes, L. H. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 71–90). Reno, Nv: Context Press.
GOSWAMI, U., & BROWN, A. L. (1990). Higher-order structure and relational reasoning: Contrasting analogical and thematic relations. Cognition, 36, 207–226.
MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529–542.
PÉREZ-GONZÂLEZ, L. A. (1993). Transfer of relational control in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 487–503.
PÉREZ-GONZÂLEZ, L. A. (2001). Concept formation based on relations among values of multi-component figures. Behavioural Processes, 56, 1–14.
Pérez-Gonzälez, L. A., & Serna, R. W. (in press). Transfer of specific contextual functions to novel conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.
SAUNDERS, R. R., DRAKE, K. M., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 195–214.
SAUNDERS, K., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1989). Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: The effect of training the component simple discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 1–12.
SAUNDERS, K. J., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1990). Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: The development of generalized skills. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 239–250.
SERNA, R. W. (1991). Interchangeability of stimulus terms in five-term contingencies. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 9, 2–3.
SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.
SIDMAN, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146.
SMEETS, P. M., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & CULLI NAN, V. (2000). Establishing equivalence classes with match-to-sample format and simultaneous-discrimination format conditional discrimination tasks. The Psychological Record, 50, 721–744.
SMEETS, P. M., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001). Derived stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus relations in children and adults: Assessing training order effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 130–154.
STEWART, I, BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001). Generating derived relational networks via the abstraction of common physical properties: A possible model of analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 51, 381–408.
STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2002). A functional-analytic model of analogy: A relational frame analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 375–396.
STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585–598.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carpentier, F., Smeets, P.M. & Barnes-Holmes, D. Equivalence-Equivalence: Matching Stimuli with same Discriminative Functions. Psychol Rec 54, 145–162 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395466
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395466