Abstract
To examine the transfer of function phenomenon two 3- member equivalence classes were established using the typical selection response of key pressing (A 1, 81, C1, & A2, 82, C2). One 3-member class was then made functionally equivalent by training a topographically distinct response (clapping) to A 1 and obtaining clapping at 81 and C1. Five experiments examined the effects of adding a new function (stamping) to members of this original functional equivalence class. In Experiment 1 a new function was added to a three-member functional equivalence class by training it to a stimulus other than where the original function trained. The results indicated that for adults and 12-yearold children the new function transferred to all original class members. However, for two 6-yr-old children the new function did not transfer to all class members. Experiments 2, 3, 4, and 5 were conducted exclusively with children who were approximately 6 years old and addressed issues arising from the findings of Experiment 1. Specifically, these experiments investigated the effects of the number of presentations of the stimuli in the transfer of function testing stage, where the new function was trained in relation to the original function, when the function was trained in relation to the actual equivalence training, and how the functions were trained. The general finding was that the new function rarely transferred to all members of an established three-member functional equivalence class for children who were approximately 6 years old, unless the new function was trained to the stimulus where the original function was trained. These findings may have relevance to the debate on both the constitution of class membership and contextual control of equivalence responding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BARNES, D., BROWNE, M., SMEETS, P., & ROCHE, B. (1995). A transfer of functions and conditional transfer of functions through equivalence relations in three- to six-year-old children. The Psychological Record, 45, 405–430.
BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61–81.
BUSH, K. M., SIDMAN, M., & De ROSE, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 567–584.
COOPER, J. O., HERON, T. E., & HEWARD, W. L. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. Merrill Publishing.
DOUGHER, M. J., AUGUSTON, E. M., MARKHAM, M. R., WULFERT, E., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331–351.
FIELDS, L., LANDON-JIMENEZ, D. V, BUFFINGTON, D. M., & ADAMS, B. J. (1995). Maintained nodal-distance effects in equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 129–145.
HAYES, S. C. (Ed.). (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum.
HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & S. C Hayes (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp.191–220). New York: Plenum.
HAYES, S. C., KOHLENBERG, B. S., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119–137.
KOHLENBERG, B. S., HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of contextual control over equivalence classes through equivalence classes: A possible model of social stereotyping. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 505–518.
LAZAR, R. M., & KOTLARCHYK, B. J. (1986). Second order control of sequenceclass equivalences in children. Behavioral Processes, 13, 205–215.
LEADER, G., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent type procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685–706.
MCGLINCHEY, A., & KEENAN, M. (1997). Stimulus equivalence and social categorization in Northern Ireland. Behavior and Social Issues, Volume 7, Number 2, 113–128.
MOXON, P., KEENAN, M., & HINE, L. (1993). Gender-role stereotyping and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 381–394.
PILGRIM, C., CHAMBERS, L., & GALLLLO, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: 2. Children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 239–254.
PILGRIM, C., & GALLLLO, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: Adults. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 225–238.
SAUNDERS, R. R., WACHTER, J., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95–115.
SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Leiller (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In H. Lejeune & D. Blackman (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.
SIDMAN, M., WYNNE, C. K., MAGUIRE, R. W., & BARNES, T. (1989). Functional classes and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 261–274.
SMEETS, P. M., BARNES, D., & ROCHE, B. (1997). Functional rquivalence in children: Derived stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus relations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66(1), 1–17.
SPENCER, T. J., & CHASE, P. N. (1996). Speed analysis of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 643–659.
SPRADLIN, J., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1984). Behaving appropriately in new situations: A stimulus class analysis. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 574–579.
WATT, A., KEENAN, M., BARNES, D., & CAIRNS, E. (1991). Social categorization and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 41, 33–50.
WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1989). Transfer of conditioned ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489–504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article was written while Robert Bones was the holder of a Research Grant from the Department of Education for Northern Ireland.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bones, R., Keenan, M., Askin, D. et al. The Effects of Response Topography on Functional Equivalence Class Formation. Psychol Rec 51, 89–110 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395388
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395388