Skip to main content
Log in

A Methodological Integration of Generalized Equivalence Classes, Natural Categories, and Cross-Modal Perception

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A generalized equivalence class contains some stimuli that are perceptually disparate and others that resemble one another. They all function as members of a generalized equivalence class when all of them occasion the selection of the others in the set, and a response trained to one or a few are occasioned by all other stimuli in the set. This article formalizes the structural relations among the stimuli in these classes and identifies the generalization tests needed to fully document the range of stimuli that function as members of such a class. These include tests conducted in variant-to-base, base-to-variant, and variant-tovariant formats. The structural and functional properties that characterize generalized equivalence classes also characterize naturally occurring categories, natural kinds, semantic superordinate categories, and cross-modal perceptual classes. Thus, the procedures used to measure generalized equivalence classes could also be used to document these other classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADAMS, B. J., FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1993). The formation of generalized equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 43, 553–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BAHRICK, L. E., & PICKENS, J. N. (1994). Amodal relations: The basis for intermodal perception and learning in infancy. In D. J. Lewkowicz & R. Likliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives. Englewood, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D,. & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and nonarbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BELANICH, J., & FIELDS, L. (1999). Tactual equivalence class formation and tactual-to-visual cross modal transfer. The Psychological Record, 49, 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • BENTALL, R. P., DICKINS, D. W, & FOX, S. R. A. (1993). Naming and equivalence: response latencies for emergent relations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B, (May), 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEGRANDPRE, R. J., BICKEL, W.K., & HIGGINS, S. T. (1992). Emergent equivalence relations between interoceptive (drug) and exteroceptive (visual) stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 9–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DUBE, W. V., GREEN, G., & SERNA, R. W (1993). Auditory successive conditional discrimination and auditory stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 103–114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., BROWN, J. L., & VERHAVE, T. (1993). The generalization of emergent relations in equivalence classes: Stimulus substitutability. The Psychological Record, 43, 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., BUFFINGTON, D. M., YANG, W, & VERHAVE, T. (1996). Response transfer between stimuli in generalized equivalence classes: A model for the establishment of natural kind and fuzzy superordinate categories. The Psychological Record, 46, 655–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., HOBBIE-REEVE, S. A., ADAMS, B. J., & REEVE, K. E, (1999). Effects of training directionality and class size on equivalence class formation by adults. The Psychological Record, 49, 703–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., LANDON-JIMENEZ, D. V., BUFFINGTON, D. M., & ADAMS, B. J. (1995). Maintained nodal distance effects after equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 129–146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., & REEVE, K. E (in press). Equivalence classes and natural categories from the generalization of perceptual and relational classes. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Issues in experimental and applied analyses of human behavior. Reno, Nv: Context Press.

  • FIELDS, L., REEVE, K. E, ADAMS, B. J., BROWN, J. L., & VERHAVE, T. (1997). Predicting the extension of equivalence classes from primary generalization gradients: The merger of equivalence classes and perceptual classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 68–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., REEVE, K. E, ROSEN, D., VARELAS, A., ADAMS, B. J., BELANICH, J., & HOBBIE, S. A. (1997). Using the simultaneous protocol to study equivalence class formation: The facilitating effects of nodal number and size of previously established equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 367–389.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GELMAN, S. A. (1988a). Children’s expectations concerning natural kind categories. Human Development, 31, 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GELMAN, S. A. (1988b). The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 65–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GELMAN, S. A., & MARKHAM, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23, 183–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GELMAN, S. A., & MARKHAM, E. M. (1987). Young children’s inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearances. Child Development, 58, 1532–1541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GOLDIAMOND, I. (1962). Perception. In A. J. Bachrach (Ed.), Experimental foundations of clinical psychology (pp. 280–340). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1990). Levels of stimulus control: A functional approach. Cognition, 37, 133–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HERRNSTEIN, R. J., LOVELAND, D. H., & CABLE, C. (1964). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processess, 4, 285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOMA, D., & LITTLE, J. (1985). The abstraction and long-term retention of ill defined categories by children. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 325–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HRYCENKO, O., & HARWOOD, D. W. (1980). Judgments of shape similarity in the Brabary dove (Streptopelia risoria). Animal Behaviour, 28, 586–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HULL, C. L. (1920). Quantitative aspects of the evolution of concepts. Psychological Monographs, 28, (1, Whole No. 132).

  • INNIS, A., LANE, S. D., MILLER, E. R., & CRITCHFIELD, T. S. (1998). Stimulus equivalence: Effects of a default-response option on emergence of untrained stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 87–102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • JITSUMORI, M. (1993). Category discrimination of artificial polymorphous stimuli based on feature learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 244–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • JITSUMORI, M. (1994). Artificial polymorphous categories in humans and nonhumans. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavioral analysis of language and cognition (pp. 91–106). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KELLER, E S., & SCHOENFELD, W. N. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • KENNEDY, C. L. (1991). Equivalence class formation influenced by the number of nodes separating stimuli. Behavioral Processes, 24, 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LANE, S. D., CLOW, J. K., INNIS, A., & CRITCHFIELD, T. S. (1998). Generalization of cross-modal stimulus equivalence classes: Operant processes as components in human category formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 267–280.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LANE, S. D., INNIS, A., CLOW, J. K., & CRITCHFIELD, T. S. (1998). Preliminary evidence for cross-modal generalized equivalence classes. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 24, 311–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEA, S. E. G. (1984). In what sense do pigeons learn concepts? In H. L. Roitblatt, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 263–276). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEA, S. E. G., & HARRISON, S. N. (1978). Discrimination of polymorphous stimulus sets in pigeons. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 521–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEWKOWICZ, D. J. (1994). Development of intersensory perception in human infants. In D. J. Lewkowicz & R. Likliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives. Englewood, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., GREEN, G., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Programming conceptual and communication skill development. In A. P. Kaiser & D. B. Gray (Eds.), Enhancing children’s communication: Research foundations for intervention (Volume 2). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCDONAGH, E. C., MCILVANE, W. C., & STODDARD, L. T. (1984). Teaching coin equivalences via matching to sample. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 5, 177–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MEDIN, D. L., & SMITH, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 35, 113–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEEHAN, E. E, & FIELDS, L. (1995). Contextual control of new equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 45, 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REHFELDT, R. A, HAYES, L. J., & STEELE, A. (1998). Assessing the primary generalization of equivalence along the dimension of stimulus hue. Experimental Anaysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 16, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSCH, E. H., & MERVIS, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAUNDERS, K. J., SAUNDERS, R. R., WILLIAMS, D. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAUNDERS, R. R., DRAKE, K. M., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAUNDERS, R. R., & GREEN, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 117–138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SAUNDERS, R. R., WACHTER, J. A, & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member stimulus class via conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95–115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 15–27). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., KIRK, S., & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SPENCER, T. J., & CHASE, P. N. (1996). Speed analysis of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 643–659.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • STROMER, R., MACKAY, H. A., HOWELL, S. R., & MCVAY, A. A. (1996). Teaching computer-based spelling to individuals with developmental and hearing disabilities: transfer of stimulus control to writing tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 25–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • VARELAS, A., FIELDS, L., WADHWA, P., DEROSSE, P., & BELANICH, J. (May, 1999). Using variant-to-base and base-to-variant tests to assess the emergence of generalized equivalence classes. Paper presented in the symposium, Measuring and characterizing generalized equivalence classes, at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis. Chicago, II.

    Google Scholar 

  • WADHWA, P., FIELDS, L., DEROSSE, P., VARELAS, A., & BELANICH, J. (May, 1999). The effect of testing format on membership in a dimensional stimulus class. A paper presented in the symposium, Measuring and characterizing generalized equivalence classes, presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis. Chicago, II.

    Google Scholar 

  • WASSERMAN, E. A., & DEVOLDER, C. L. (1993). Similarity and nonsimilaritybased conceptualization in children and pigeons. The Psychological Record, 43, 779–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WASSERMAN, E. A., KIEDINGER, R. E., & BHATT, R. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRIGHT, A. A., COOK, R. G., RIVERA, J. J., SANDS, S. F., & DELIUS, J. D. (1988). Concept learning by pigeons: Matching-to-sample with trial-unique video picture stimuli. Animal Learning and Behavior, 16, 436–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

James Belanich, Pamela DeRosse, Priya Wadhwa, and Antonios Varelas provided valuable suggestions during the preparation of this manuscript. This research was conducted with support from Contract DASW01-96-K-0009 from the U. S. Army Research Institute, and by PSC-CUNY Research Awards 68547, 69567, and 61617.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fields, L., Reeve, K.F. A Methodological Integration of Generalized Equivalence Classes, Natural Categories, and Cross-Modal Perception. Psychol Rec 51, 67–87 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395387

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395387

Navigation