Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Manipulating the Illusion of Control: Variations in Gambling as a Function of Perceived Control Over Chance Outcomes

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined the ability to experimentally manipulate the cognitive heuristic entitled the “illusion of control.” Five adult human females gambled at roulette for the opportunity to earn course extra-credit points. An alternating treatments design was utilized whereby in one condition subjects were allowed to select the location on the roulette board they placed their bets, and in the other condition subjects had to give their chips to the experimenter to select the location. In addition, after subjects had played the game for a number of trials, inaccurate rules related to this “illusion of control” were introduced in a multiple baseline fashion across subjects, later followed by accurate rules. Results show that the control heuristic may exist for subjects, yet that it can be brought under experimental control through the use of experimenter delivered instructions. Implications for a behavioral treatment of gambling and for a within-subject approach to the study of rule-governed behavior are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BARON, A., & GALIZIO, M. (1983). Instructional control of human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 33, 495–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • CALDWELL, G. T. (1974). The gambling Australian. In D. E. Edgar (Ed.), Social change in Australia (pp. 13–23). Melbourne, Australia: Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C., MATTHEWS, B. A., & SHIMOFF, E. (1982). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 233–248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CRITCHFIELD, T. S., & PERONE, M. (1990). Verbal self-reports as a function of speed, accuracy, and reinforcement of the reported performance. The Psychological Record, 40, 541–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • DICKERSON, M. G., FABRE, J., & BAYLISS, D. (1986). A comparison of Tab customers and poker machine players. In J. McMillen (Ed.), Gambling in the 80’s. Griffith University, Queensland: National Association for Gambling Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIXON, M. R., HAYES, L. J., & ABAN, I. (2000). Accurate rules, inaccurate rules, and self-rules: Gambling as a verbally maintained behavior. The Psychological Record, 50, 687–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIXON, M. R., HAYES, L. J., & EBBS, R. E. (1998). Engaging in illusionary control during repeated risk-taking. Psychological Reports, 83, 959–962.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DIXON, M. R., HAYES, L. J., REHFELDT, R. A., & EBBS, R. E. (1998). An adjusting procedure for studying outcomes of risk-taking. Psychological Reports, 82, 1047–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIXON, M. R., MACLIN, O. H., & HAYES, L. J. (1999). Towards a molecular analysis of video poker playing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 185–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C (1987). Rule-governed behavior: Cognitions, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., BROWNSTEIN, A. J., HAAS, J. Ft., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1986). Instructions, multiple schedules, and extinction: Distinguishing rule- governed behavior from schedule-controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 137–147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., BROWNSTEIN, A. J., ZETTLE, R. D., ROSENFARB, L., & KORN, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237–256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KNAPP, T. J. (1998). Behaviorism and public policy: B. R Skinner’s views on gambling. Behavior and Social issues, 7, 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • LADOUCEUR, Ft., GABOURY, A., DUMONT, M., & ROCHETTE, R (1988). Gambling: the relation between the frequency of wins and irrational thinking. Journal of Psychology, 122, 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LANGER, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32, 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEFRANCOIS, J. R., CHASE, F. N., & JOYCE, J. H. (1988). The effects of a variety of instructions on human fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 383–393.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PRESSON, P. K., & DENASSI, V. A. (1996). Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 493–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIMOFF, E., MATTHEWS, B. A., & CATANIA, A. C. (1986). Human operant performance: Sensitivity and pseudosensitivity to contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 149–157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • VAUGHAN, M. E. (1985). Repeated acquisition in the analysis of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 175–184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Behavior Analysis and Therapy Program, Rehabilitation Institute, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, 62901, USA

    Mark R. Dixon

Authors
  1. Mark R. Dixon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R. Dixon.

Additional information

Data collection for this study occurred while the author was affiliated with Trinity Services, Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dixon, M.R. Manipulating the Illusion of Control: Variations in Gambling as a Function of Perceived Control Over Chance Outcomes. Psychol Rec 50, 705–719 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395379

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395379

Search

Navigation