Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine the participation of a variety of variables in gambling behavior. Forty-five subjects were exposed to an experimental roulette game played for course extra-credit points. In Phase 1, subjects played a fair game (i.e., completely random outcomes) without any instructions regarding the programmed contingencies for 75 trials. During Phase 2, subjects were exposed to an adjusted game with payback percentages of either p =.2, p =.8, or continued at p = fair and instructions related to play. Lastly, during Phase 3 all subjects were exposed to an adjusted game with a payback percentage of.2 and an option for escape. Results show that subjects exposed to inaccurate rules regarding play took higher levels of risk, made larger bets, and chose the escape option later than subjects exposed to accurate or no rules related to play. Although reinforcement density varied across subjects exposed to the same rule condition, there was no significant effect of that manipulation on subsequent gambles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AGRESTI, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
CALDWELL, G. T. (1974). The gambling Australian. In D. E. Edgar (Ed.), Social change in Australia (pp. 13–23). Melbourne, Australia: Cheshire.
CATANIA, A. C. (1992). Learning (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
CATANIA, A. C., MATTHEWS, B. A., & SHIMOFF, E. (1982). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 233–248.
COLLINS, A. F. (1996). The pathological gambler and the government of gambling. History of the Human Sciences, 9, 69–100.
DICKERSON, M. G. FABRE, J., & BAYLISS, D. (1986). A comparison of Tab customers and poker machine players. In J. McMillen (Ed.), Gambling in the 80’s. Griffith University, Queensland: National Association for Gambling Studies.
DIXON, M. R., & HAYES, L. J. (1998). Effects of different instructional histories on the resurgence of rule-following. The Psychological Record, 48, 275–292.
DIXON, M. R., HAYES, L. J., & EBBS, R. E. (1998). Engaging in illusionary control during repeated risk-taking. Psychological Reports, 83, 959–962.
DIXON, M. R., HAYES, L J., REHFELDT, R. A., & EBBS, R. E. (1998). An adjusting procedure for studying outcomes of risk-taking. Psychological Reports, 82, 1047–1050.
FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
GHEZZI, P., LYONS, C., & DIXON, M. R. (2000). Gambling from a socioeconomic perspective. In W. K. Bickel & R. E. Vuchinich (Eds.), Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics (pp. 313–338). New York: Erlbaum.
HAYES, S. C (1986). The case of the silent dog — Verbal reports and the analysis of rules: A review of Ericsson and Simon’s Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351–363.
HAYES, S. C., BROWNSTEIN, A. J., HAAS, J. R., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1986). Instructions, multiple schedules, and extinction: Distinguishing rule- governed behavior from schedule-controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 137–147.
HAYES, S. C., BROWNSTEIN, A. J., ZETTLE, R. D., ROSENFARB, I., & KORN, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237–256.
HAYES, S. C., ZETTLE, R. D, & ROSENFARB, I. (1987). Rule-following. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum Press.
KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
KNAPP, T. J. (1976). The Premack Principle in human experimental and applied settings. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14(2), 133–147.
KNOWLES, E. (1976). Searching for motivations in risk-taking and gambling. In W. Eadington (Ed.), Gambling and society: Interdisciplinary studies on the subject of gambling (pp. 295–307). Springfield, II: Charles C. Thomas.
LADOUCEUR, R., BOISVERT, J. M., & DUMONT, J. (1994). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for adolescent pathological gamblers. Behavior Modification, 18, 230–242.
LADOUCEUR, R., GABOURY, A., DUMONT, M., & ROCHETTE, P. (1988). Gambling: Relationship between the frequency of wins and irrational thinking. Journal of Psychology, 122(4), 409–414.
LADOUCEUR, R., MAYRAND, M., & TOURIGNY, Y. (1987) Risk-taking behavior in gamblers and non-gamblers during prolonged exposure. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 3(2), 115–122.
LEFRANCOIS, J. R., CHASE, P. N., & JOYCE, J. H. (1988). The effects of a variety of instructions on human fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 383–393.
MARTIN, G., & PEAR, J. (1992). Behavior modification: What it is and how to do it. New York: Prentice Hall.
MAZUR, J. E. (1994). Learning and behavior. New York: Prentice Hail.
RACHLIN, H., RAINERI, A., & CROSS, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233–244.
ROTTER, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1, Whole No. 609).
SCHWARTZ, B. (1992). Psychology of learning and behavior. New York: Norton.
SHIMOFF, E., MATTHEWS, B. A., & CATANIA, A. C. (1986). Human operant performance: Sensitivity and pseudosensitivity to contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 149–157.
VAUGHAN, M. E. (1985). Repeated acquisition in the analysis of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 175–184.
WULFERT, E., GREENWAY, D. E., FARKAS, P., HAYES, S. C., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1994). Correlation between self-reported rigidity and rule-governed insensitivity to operant contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 659–671.
YAMAGUCHI, K. (1991). Event history analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The present study was completed by Mark Dixon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctoral Degree in Psychology at the University of Nevada. We thank the additional members of that dissertation committee, Drs. Patrick M. Ghezzi, Steven C. Hayes, and Catherine Fowler. Additional thanks are given to Melissa Hernandez and Ralph E. Ebbs for assistance in the data collection.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dixon, M.R., Hayes, L.J. & Aban, I.B. Examining the Roles of Rule Following, Reinforcement, and Preexperimental Histories on Risk-Taking Behavior. Psychol Rec 50, 687–704 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395378
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395378