Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Behaviors as Determined by Different Arrangements of Social Consequences: Social Loafing, Social Facilitation, Deindividuation, and A Modified Social Loafing

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A synthesis is proposed such that social loafing, social facilitation, and deindividuation are viewed as different ways of arranging social consequences. The effects of such arrangements have been measured in past research through productive output (social loafing and social facilitation) or through anti normative behaviors (deindividuation). All three effects are manipulable by changing individual identifiability, evaluation, social identity, task difficulty, and presence in a group. In general, when people are in groups then there is less individual visibility and therefore fewer negative social consequences individually for reducing output or for increasing socially unacceptable behaviors, even if outputs are not explicitly pooled (traditional social loafing). Whereas social loafing and social facilitation have been empirically linked in past experiments, social loafing and deindividuation have not. An experiment was therefore conducted in which participants worked on a brainstorming task alone or in a group, and with or without individual identifiability. Effects of both a modified social loafing paradigm (reduced output in groups) and a deindividuation paradigm (more socially unacceptable responses in groups) were found simultaneously for the first time. Combined with other good evidence linking social loafing and social facilitation, this supports the idea that the three topics are not separate phenomena but different arrangements of social consequence variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Selfcategorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.

  • BREWER, N. (1995). The effects of monitoring individual and group performance on the distribution of effort across tasks. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 760–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BURNHAM, W. H. (1910). The group as a stimulus to mental activity. Science, 31, 761–766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COTTRELL, N. B. (1972). Social facilitation. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 185–236). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIENER, E. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and selfregulation in group members. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 209–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • FELDMAN, R. S. (1995). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • FESTINGER, L., PEPITONE, A., & NEWCOMB, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GEEN, R. G. (1989). Alternative conceptions of social facilitation. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 15–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRIFFITH, T. L., FINCHAM, M., & MORELAND, R. L. (1989). Social loafing and social facilitation: An empirical test of the cognitive-motivational model of performance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B. (1983). Social facilitation and social monitoring: A test of three models. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B. (1991). AntiCipating the consequences of social behavior. Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 10, 131–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B. (1993). Social facilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B. (1994). Analyzing social behavior: Behavior analysis and the social sciences. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B. (1995a). Generalized social consequences, ritually reinforced behaviors, and the difficulties of analysing social contingencies in the real world. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 13, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B. (1995b). Social influence in one-to-one and group situations: Predicting influence tactics from basic group processes. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B., & Sejima, J. (1997). Verbal community reinforcement, with an illustration using the Esoteric Buddhist concepts of Fuse and Muzai No Nanase. The Psychological Record, 47, 233–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARKINS, S. G. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HARKINS, S. G., & PETTY, R. E. (1982). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1214–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HARKINS, S. G., & PETTY, R. E. (1983). Social context effects in persuasion: The effects of multiple sources and multiple targets. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 149–175). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • HARKINS, S. G., & SZYMANSKI, K. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation: New wine in old bottles. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 167–188). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARKINS, S. G., & SZYMANSKI, K. (1988). Social loafing and self-evaluation with an objective standard. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HARKINS, S. G., & SZYMANSKI, K. (1989). Social loafing and group evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 934–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (Ed.). (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., ROSENFARB, I., WULFERT, E., MUNT, E. D., KORN, Z., & ZETTLE, R. D. (1985). Self-reinforcement effects: An artifact of social standard setting? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 201–214.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HOGG, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOGG, M. A., & ABRAMS, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and social processes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • JACKSON, J. M., & WILLIAMS, K. D. (1985). Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 937–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1982). Cultural psychology. Chicago, IL: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KARAU, S. J., & WILLIAMS, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LATANE, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LATANE, B., WILLIAMS, K., & HARKINS, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 823–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILES, J. A., & GREENBERG, J. (1993). Using punishment threats to attenuate social loafing effects amongst swimmers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 246–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MYERS, D. G. (1994). Exploring social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • PAULUS, P. B. (1983). Group influences on individual task performance. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 97–120). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • POSTMES, T., & SPEARS, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRENTICE-DUNN, S., & ROGERS, R. W. (1980). Effects of deindividuating situational cues and aggressive models on subjective deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 104–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PRENTICE-DUNN, S., & ROGERS, R. W. (1982). Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 503–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRENTICE-DUNN, S., & ROGERS, R. W. (1989). Deindividuation and the selfregulation of behavior. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 87–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • REICHER, S. D. (1984). Social influence in the crowd: Attitudinal and behavioral effects of deindividuation in conditions of high and low group salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REICHER, S. D., & LEVINE, M. (1994a). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the outgroup. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REICHER, S. D., & LEVINE, M. (1994b). On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REICHER, S. D., LEVINE, M., & GORDIJN, E. (1998). More on deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: Three studies on the effects of visibility to the in-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 15–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RINGELMANN, M. (1913). Recherches sur les moteurs animes: Travail de I’homme. Annales de I’lnstitut National Agronomique, 2e serie, 12, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTS, R. N., NELSON, R. O., & OLSON, T. W. (1987). Self-instructions: An analysis of the differential effects of instructions and reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 235–242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ROSENFARB, I., & HAYES, S. C. (1984). Social standard setting: The Achilles heel of informational accounts of therapeutic change. Behavior Therapy, 15, 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SANDERS, G. S. (1981). Driven by distraction: An integrative review of social facilitation theory and research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SANNA, L. J. (1992). Self-efficacy theory: Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 774–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SZYMANSKI, K., & HARKINS, S. G. (1993). The effect of experimenter evaluation on self-evaluation within the social loafing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 268–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TRIPLETT, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHITE, G. L. (1977). Counternormative behavior as influenced by deindividuating conditions and reference group salience. Journal of Social Psychology, 103, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, K., HARKINS, S., & LATANÉ, B. (1981). Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, K. D., & KARAU, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570–581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WORCHEL, S., HART, D., & BUTEMEYER, J. (1991). Is social loafing a group phenomenon? The effects of membership interdependence on work output. Unpublished paper, Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • YAMAGISHI, T., & COOK, K. S. (1993). Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZAJONC, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ZIMBARDO, P. G. (1970). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1969 (pp. 237–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of Waikato, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Bernard Guerin

Authors
  1. Bernard Guerin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Guerin.

Additional information

This research was supported by a SSSRC Grant. I thank Lisa Parker, Leonie Doran, Fleur Marillier, and Joanne Smith for running the study so carefully and conscientiously.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guerin, B. Social Behaviors as Determined by Different Arrangements of Social Consequences: Social Loafing, Social Facilitation, Deindividuation, and A Modified Social Loafing. Psychol Rec 49, 565–577 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395327

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395327

Search

Navigation