Skip to main content
Log in

Errors and Response Latencies as a Function of Nodal Distance in 5-Member Equivalence Classes

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the relationship between nodal distance, response accuracy, and response latency during testing for emergent relations. In both experiments, undergraduate subjects first learned A-B, B-C, C-D, and D-E constituent relations of six 5-member equivalence classes. In Experiment 1, only selected tests of trained and of 0-, 1-, and 2-node tests of emergent relations were carried out in order to avoid testing of 0- or 1-node relations that might form constituents of the 2-node relations which were tested. In Experiment 2, all possible trained and derived relations were tested in random order. Although considerable individual variability was observed in both response times and accuracy for the 14 subjects completing Experiment 1, latencies for correct responses generally increased and response accuracy decreased as a function of nodal distance. There was no nodal distance effect for latencies of incorrect responses. In Experiment 2, these relationships between response times, response accuracy, and nodal distance were observed for 3-node relations in 5 out of 6 subjects. Analysis of error response latencies for 2 subjects who made sufficient errors revealed a nodal distance effect for 1 subject but not for the other. In both experiments, response times decreased as testing progressed, but response accuracy increased during testing only in the second experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANDERSON, J. R. (1985). The architecture of cognition. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • BENTALL, R. P., & DICKINS, D. W. (1994). Differences between animal and human learning: Implicit and explicit processes. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BENTALL, R. P., DICKINS, D. W., & FOX, S. R. A. (1993). Naming and equivalence: Response latencies for emergent relations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B, 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • CERUTTI, D. T., & RUMBAUGH, D. M. (1993). Stimulus relations in comparative primate perspective. The Psychological Record, 43, 811–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLLINS, A. M., & QUILLIAN, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C., & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DICKINS, D. W., BENTALL, R. P., & SMITH, A. B. (1993). The role of individual stimulus names in the emergence of equivalence relations: The effects of paired-associates training between names. The Psychological Record, 43, 713–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DUGDALE, N., & LOWE, C. F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice (pp. 115–138). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., NEWMAN, S., & VERHAVE, T. (1992). Interactions among emergent relations during equivalence class formation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45B, 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., VERHAVE, T., & NEWMAN, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence sets. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 345–358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., & NEVIN, J. A. (1993). Stimulus equivalence: A special issue of The Psychological Record, 43(4), 541–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385–392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HORNE, P. J., & LOWE, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KENNEDY, C. L. (1991). Equivalence class formation influenced by the number of nodes separating stimuli. Behavior Processes, 24, 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LAZAR, R. M., DAVIS-LANG, D., & SANCHEZ, L. (1984). The formulation of visual stimulus equivalences in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 251–266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SAUNDERS, K. J. (1989). Naming in conditional discrimination and stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 379–384.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SAUNDERS, R. R., WACHTER, J. A., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95–115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SCHUSTERMAN, R. J., & KASTAK, D. (1993). A california sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. LeJeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice (pp. 93–114). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors’ Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., KIRK, B., & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. W. Dickins.

Additional information

We acknowledge the help of R. J. Bowles, M. Brown, D. Chadwick, D. Hughes, A. Garside, B. Rogers, and S. Turner who contributed to the collection of data for Experiment 1. We also thank Tom Critchfield and William Dube for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bentall, R.P., Jones, R.M. & Dickins, D.W. Errors and Response Latencies as a Function of Nodal Distance in 5-Member Equivalence Classes. Psychol Rec 49, 93–115 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395309

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395309

Navigation