Abstract
Previous studies have shown that conditional discrimination training procedures involving identity matching to complex samples can produce emergent arbitrary relations. Identity-based training with complex stimuli therefore may be a valuable procedure for efficiently generating large networks of stimulus relations. The present study was an attempt to increase the yield of emergent relations from identity-based procedures by (a) including an extra (cross-modal) stimulus among the elements of the complex sample that was not implicated directly in the experimental contingencies and (b) including this extra stimulus in overlapping stimulus sets to promote the merger of separately trained classes. Identity-based relations were taught in the format of ABCD-X, in which Stimuli A, B, and C were visual symbols presented as a compound, D was an auditory stimulus presented simultaneously with the ABC compound, and X was a correct comparison stimulus identical to A, B, or C. Four 4-member stimulus classes emerged from this training, and pairs of classes sharing an auditory stimulus (D) subsequently merged to form two 7-member classes. The training of 12 identity-based relations produced 72 untrained arbitrary relations. This yield rivals that expected from stimulus equivalence procedures involving arbitrary-matching training and thus provides encouragement for the extension of identity-based procedures in the field of stimulus equivalence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BARON, A., & MENICH, S. R. (1985). Reaction times of older and younger men: Effects of compound samples and a prechoice signal on delayed matching-to-sample performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 1–14.
BURKE, J. C., & CERNIGLIA, L. (1990). Stimulus complexity and autistic childrens’ responsivity: Assessing and training a pivotal behavior. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 20, 233–253.
CARRIGAN, P. F., & SIDMAN, M. (1992). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: A theoretical analysis of control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 183–204.
CRITCHFIELD, T. S., TUCKER, J. A., & VUCHINICH, R. E. (in press). Selfreport methods. In K. A. Latta I & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior. New York: Plenum.
DUBE, W. V., GREEN, G., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Auditory successive conditional discrimination and auditory stimulus classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 103–114.
ERICSSON, K. A., & SIMON, H. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332.
GARNER, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
HARRISON, R. J., & GREEN, G. (1990). Development of conditional and equivalence relations without differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 225–237.
HAYES, S. C. (1986). The case of the silent dog–Verbal reports and the analysis of rules: A review of Ericsson and Simon’s Protocol Analysis: Verbal reports as data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351–363.
INNIS, A., LANE, S. D., MILLER, E. R., & CRITCHFIELD, T. S. (in press). Stimulus equivalence: Effects on emergent relations of a “none of the above” response option. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.
JOHNSON, C., & SIDMAN, M. (1993). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: Control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 333–347.
LANE, S. D., & CRITCHFIELD, T. S. (1996). Verbal self-reports of emergent relations in a stimulus equivalence procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 355–374.
LANE, S. D., & CRITCHFIELD, T. S. (1998). Classification of vowels and consonants by individuals with moderate mental retardation: Development of arbitrary relations via match-to-sample training with compound stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 21–41.
LOVAAS, I. O., & SCHREIBMAN, L. (1971). Stimulus overselectivity of autistic children in a two-stimulus situation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 9, 305–310.
REYNOLDS, G. S. (1961). Attention in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 4, 203–208.
RILEY, D. A. (1984). Do pigeons decompose stimulus compounds? In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 333–350). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
SAUNDERS, R. R., & GREEN, G. (1992). The nonequivalence of behavioral and mathematical equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 227–241.
SAUNDERS, R. R., SAUNDERS, K. J., KIRBY, K. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145–162.
SAUNDERS, R. R., SAUNDERS, K. J., WILLIAMS, D. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 41, 725–744.
SAUNDERS, R. R., WACHTER, J. A., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95–115.
SCHENK, J. J. (1993). Emergent conditional discrimination in children: Matching to compound stimuli. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B(4), 345–365.
SCHENK, J. J. (1995). Complex stimuli in nonreinforced simple and conditional discriminations. The Psychological Record, 45, 477–494.
SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.
SIDMAN, M., KIRK, B., & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21–42.
SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.
SMEETS, P. M., SCHENK, J. J., & BARNES, D. (1994). Establishing transfer from identity to arbitrary matching tasks via complex stimuli under testing conditions: A follow-up study. The Psychological Record, 44, 521–536.
STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1992). Spelling and emergent picture-printed word relations established with delayed identity matching to complex samples. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 893–904.
STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Delayed identity matching to complex samples: Teaching students with mental retardation spelling and the prerequisites for equivalence classes. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 19–38.
STROMER, R., MciLVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 83–102.
STROMER, R. MciLVANE, W. J., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585–598.
STROMER, R., & STROMER, J. B. (1990). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40, 51–66.
WULFERT, E., DOUGHER, M. J., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489–504.
ZYGMONT, D., LAZAR, R., DUBE, W. V., & MciLVANE, W. J. (1992). Teaching arbitrary matching via sample stimulus-control shaping to young children and mentally retarded individuals. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 57, 109–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was part of a doctoral dissertation conducted by Scott D. Lane at Auburn University. Portions of the data were presented at the 1996 Association for Behavior Analysis Conference in San Francisco. Preparation of the manuscript was supported in part by a National Service Research Award to Scott Lane from the National Institutes of Health (DA05774), and by the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. The authors thank Robert Stromer, William Dube, and William Mcllvane for helpful comments that aided the construction of the procedures and earlier versions of this manuscript
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lane, S.D., Critchfield, T.S. Increasing the Generativity of Identity-Based Procedures for Establishing Arbitrary Conditional Relations. Psychol Rec 48, 457–479 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395284
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395284