Skip to main content
Log in

Selectionist Thought and Methodological Orthodoxy in Psychological Science

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selectionist theory in psychology conceptualizes behavior as a dynamic phenomenon subject to a variation and selection process similar to that characterizing biological evolution. Though not formally recognized as a dominant psychological metatheory, selectionist thought can be identified in the writings of many of the discipline’s eminent scholars. Although selectionism may possess considerable promise as a unifying theory, its widespread acceptance has likely been impeded by the large sample, null hypothesis testing research deSigns associated with the Fisherian tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BARASH, D. (1982). Sociobiology and behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • BORING, E. G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York: D. Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWER, G. H., & HILGARD, E. R. (1981). Theories of learning (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAMPBELL, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CALVIN, W. (1987). The brain as a Darwin machine. Nature, 330, 33–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, J. (1990). Some things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist. 45, 1304–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, J. (1994). The earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COSMIDES, L., & TOOBY, J. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, Part II: Case study: A computational theory of social exchange. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 51–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRAWFORD, C. B. (1989). The theory of evolution: Of what value to psychology? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRAWFORD, C. B., & ANDERSON, J. L. (1989). Sociobiology: An environmentalist discipline? American Psychologist, 44, 1449–1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da PRATO, R. A. (1992). Large group fantasies and single-subject science. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EBBINGHAUS, H. (1885). Memory. (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.) New York: Teachers College, 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • EDELMAN, G. (1987). Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELDREDGE, N., & GOULD, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, C. D. (1992). Is unified positivism the answer to psychology’s disunity? American Psychologist, 47, 1057–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAASE, R. F., ELLIS, M. V., & LADANY, N. (1989). Multiple criteria for evaluating the magnitude of experimental effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 511–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HARCUM, E. R. (1990). Methodological versus empirical literature: Two views on casual acceptance of the null hypothesis. American Psychologist, 45, 404–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HUITEMA, B. E. (1986). Statistical analysis and single-subject designs: Some misunderstandings. In A. Poling & R. W. Fuqua (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavior analysis: Issues and advances. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSTON, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1980). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • KUHN, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KUKLA, A. (1992). Unification as a goal for psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1054–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KUNKEL, J. H. (1992). The units of unification: Theories or propositions? American Psychologist, 47, 1058–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEWONTIN, R. C. (1990). The evolution of cognition. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Thinking (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVINE, M. (1966). Hypothesis behavior by humans during discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 331–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LEVINE, M. (1970). Human discrimination learning: The subset sampling assumption. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 397–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MAYR, E. (1970). Populations, species. and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McgARTLAND, M., & POLGAR, S. (1994). Paradigm collapse in psychology: The necessity for a “two-methods” approach. Australian Psychologist, 29, 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McnALLY, R. J. (1992). Disunity in psychology: Chaos or speciation? American Psychologist, 47, 1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEISSER, U. (1985). Toward an ecologically oriented cognitive science. In T. M. Shlechter & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), New directions in cognitive science. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEWELL, A., & SIMON, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • PAVLOV, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PIAGET, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. (M. Percy & D. E. Berlyne, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • PIAGET, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (Margaret Cook, Trans.). New York: International Universities Press.

  • RICHELLE, M. (1987). Variation and selection: The evolutionary analogy in Skinner’s theory. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F Skinner: Consensus and controversy. New York: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHNEIDER, S. M. (1992). Can this marriage be saved? American Psychologist, 47, 1055–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHULTZ, D. P., & SCHULTZ, S. E. (1992). A history of modern psychology (5th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHLECHTER, T. M., & TOGLLA, M. P. (1985). Ecological directions in the study of cognition. In T. M. Shlechter & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), New directions in cognitive science. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1966). The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. Science, 153, 1205–1213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SOHN, D. (1993). Psychology of the scientist: LXVI. The idiot savants have taken over the psychology labs or Why in science using the rejection of the null hypothesis as the basis for affirming the research hypothesis is unwarranted. Psychological Reports, 73, 1167–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STAATS, A. W. (1981). Paradigmatic behaviorism, unified theory, unified theory construction, and the zeitgeist of separatism. American Psychologist, 36, 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STAATS, A. W. (1991). Unified positivism and unification psychology. American Psychologist, 46, 899–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STAATS, A. W., & MOS, L. P. (Eds.) (1987). Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 5). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILSON, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZEILER, M. D. (1977). Editorial. Journal of the Exerimental Analysis of Behavior. 27, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morgan, D.L. Selectionist Thought and Methodological Orthodoxy in Psychological Science. Psychol Rec 48, 439–456 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395283

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395283

Navigation