Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Mysticism

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a form of human action, mystical exposition constitutes an aspect of the subject matter of behavior science. Presented for analysis, therefore, is a mystical conceptualization of human experience in which vexing problems of language, logic, truth, reality, time, and utility are confronted. Commonalities among the solutions achieved by mystics and contemporary physicists to these problems are discussed, culminating in the insurmountable problem for both of the unity of opposites. The value of this exposition for behavior analysts is demonstrated in indications that behavior science is headed down this same path and may thereby expect to ponder the same questions as are occupying mystics and physicists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BOHM, D., & HILEY, B. (1975). On the intuitive understanding of non-locality as implied bv quantum theory. Birkbeck College: University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • BORN, M. (1957). Atomic physics. New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAPRA, F. (1976). The Tao of physics. New York, London and Toronto: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DE BROGLIE, L. (1949). A general survey of the work of Albert Einstein. In P. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher, Scientist (Vol. I). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • DELEUZE, G. (1983). Nietzsche and philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAMMOND, M., HOWARTH, J. & RUSSELL, K. (1991). Understanding phenomenology. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARDING, D. E. (1986). On having no head: Zen and the rediscovery of the obvious. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (1992). The psychological present. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 139–146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (1993). Reality and truth. Varieties of scientific contextualism. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (1997). Scientific knowing in psychological perspective. In L. J. Hayes & P. M. Ghezzi (Eds.), Investigations in behavioral epistemology. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., HAYES, L. J., & REESE, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s World Hypotheses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAWKING, S. W. (1988). A brief history of time from the big bang to black holes. New York, Toronto, London, Sydney & Auckland: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEIDEGGER, M. (1972). On time and being. (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row

  • HEISENBERG, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1950). Psychology and logic. Bloomington, IN: The Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1963). The scientific evolution of psychology (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: The Principia Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1981). Interbehavioral philosophy. Chicago, IL: The Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (1981). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published in 1962)

  • MURTI, T. R. V. (1955). The central phtlosophy of Buddhism. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARROTT, L. J. (1984). Listening and understanding. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 29–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PARROD, L. J. (1986). On the difference between verbal and social behaviors. In P. N. Chase & L. J. Parrott (Eds.), Psychological aspects of language. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEPPER, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RYLE, G. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes & Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • SACHS, M. (1969). Space-time and elementary interactions in relativity. Physics Today, 22, 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SARTRE, J. P. (1947). The age of reason. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHNAITTER, R. (1987). Behaviorism is not cognitive and cognitivism is not behavioral. Behaviorism, 15, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • SUZUKI, D. T. (1964). An introduction to Zen Buddhism. New York: Grove Weindenfeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • WADS, A. (1983). The way of liberation. New York & Tokyo: Weatherhill.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHEATLEY, M. J. (1992). Leadership and the new science. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • WIDGENSTEIN, L. (1969). On certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZUVAK, G. (1979). The dancing Wu Li masters. New York, Toronto, London, Sydney & Auckland: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda J. Hayes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayes, L.J. Understanding Mysticism. Psychol Rec 47, 573–596 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395247

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395247

Navigation